Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions

The performance of different indicators of plant water status as a tool for irrigation management was evaluated in mature field grown 'Golden Delicious' apple trees during the late summer of 1998. Control (C) and stress (S) treatments were studied. In the C treatment trees were irrigated dai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doltra, Jordi, Oncins, Jose Antonio, Bonany, Joan, Cohen, Moshe
Format: Artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5139
_version_ 1855491873789968384
author Doltra, Jordi
Oncins, Jose Antonio
Bonany, Joan
Cohen, Moshe
author_browse Bonany, Joan
Cohen, Moshe
Doltra, Jordi
Oncins, Jose Antonio
author_facet Doltra, Jordi
Oncins, Jose Antonio
Bonany, Joan
Cohen, Moshe
author_sort Doltra, Jordi
collection ReDivia
description The performance of different indicators of plant water status as a tool for irrigation management was evaluated in mature field grown 'Golden Delicious' apple trees during the late summer of 1998. Control (C) and stress (S) treatments were studied. In the C treatment trees were irrigated daily at 100% ETc whereas in the S treatment water was withheld during 31 days (DOY's 236-266). Predawn water potential (Psi(pd)) and midday stem water potential (Psi(stem)) were measured several times a week during the experimental period. Three daily measurements of stomatal conductance (g(s)) and stem water potential were made during five consecutive days in mid-September. Trunk diameter changes (TDC) were recorded by LVDT sensors, and from these measurements, maximum daily shrinkage (MDS), daily growth (DG), and cumulative growth (CG) were calculated. Midday Psi(stem) showed the best ratio between the response to moderate water stress and tree variability ("signal/noise" ratio) among the indicators studied here, followed closely by Psi(pd). On the other hand, the poorest water status indicator was g(s). Due to the low trunk growth rate of the trees, and its high variability, DG and CG were not adequate indicators. MDS showed a lower sensitivity to water stress and a higher variability (CV = 0.19) than midday Psi(stem) (CV = 0.08) and Psi(pd) (CV = 0.10). However, MDS correlated well with ET0 and with midday Psi(stem) (R 2= 0.79) thus, making this parameter an interesting and promising tool for irrigation management in apple orchards. More research needs to be done in order to define reference values for MDS and plant water potential indicators, in relation to evaporative conditions and in different phenological periods, and to quantify the relationship between water status indicators values and apple tree yield and fruit quality.
format Artículo
id ReDivia5139
institution Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
record_format dspace
spelling ReDivia51392025-04-25T14:45:29Z Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions Doltra, Jordi Oncins, Jose Antonio Bonany, Joan Cohen, Moshe The performance of different indicators of plant water status as a tool for irrigation management was evaluated in mature field grown 'Golden Delicious' apple trees during the late summer of 1998. Control (C) and stress (S) treatments were studied. In the C treatment trees were irrigated daily at 100% ETc whereas in the S treatment water was withheld during 31 days (DOY's 236-266). Predawn water potential (Psi(pd)) and midday stem water potential (Psi(stem)) were measured several times a week during the experimental period. Three daily measurements of stomatal conductance (g(s)) and stem water potential were made during five consecutive days in mid-September. Trunk diameter changes (TDC) were recorded by LVDT sensors, and from these measurements, maximum daily shrinkage (MDS), daily growth (DG), and cumulative growth (CG) were calculated. Midday Psi(stem) showed the best ratio between the response to moderate water stress and tree variability ("signal/noise" ratio) among the indicators studied here, followed closely by Psi(pd). On the other hand, the poorest water status indicator was g(s). Due to the low trunk growth rate of the trees, and its high variability, DG and CG were not adequate indicators. MDS showed a lower sensitivity to water stress and a higher variability (CV = 0.19) than midday Psi(stem) (CV = 0.08) and Psi(pd) (CV = 0.10). However, MDS correlated well with ET0 and with midday Psi(stem) (R 2= 0.79) thus, making this parameter an interesting and promising tool for irrigation management in apple orchards. More research needs to be done in order to define reference values for MDS and plant water potential indicators, in relation to evaporative conditions and in different phenological periods, and to quantify the relationship between water status indicators values and apple tree yield and fruit quality. 2017-06-01T10:11:46Z 2017-06-01T10:11:46Z 2007 JUL 2007 article Doltra, Jordi, Oncins, J.A., Bonany, Joan, Cohen, Moshe (2007). Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions. Irrigation Science, 25(4), 351-359. 0342-7188 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5139 10.1007/s00271-006-0051-y en openAccess Impreso
spellingShingle Doltra, Jordi
Oncins, Jose Antonio
Bonany, Joan
Cohen, Moshe
Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
title Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
title_full Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
title_fullStr Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
title_short Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
title_sort evaluation of plant based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/5139
work_keys_str_mv AT doltrajordi evaluationofplantbasedwaterstatusindicatorsinmatureappletreesunderfieldconditions
AT oncinsjoseantonio evaluationofplantbasedwaterstatusindicatorsinmatureappletreesunderfieldconditions
AT bonanyjoan evaluationofplantbasedwaterstatusindicatorsinmatureappletreesunderfieldconditions
AT cohenmoshe evaluationofplantbasedwaterstatusindicatorsinmatureappletreesunderfieldconditions