Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps

Five genetic linkage maps were constructed for the parents of three progenies: Citrus aurantium (A) x Poncirus trifoliata var. Flying Dragon (Pa), C. volka-meriana (V) x R trifoliata var. Rubidoux (Pv) and a self-pollination of P. trifoliata var. Flying Dragon (Pp). The number of polymorphic markers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruiz, C., Asins, María J.
Format: Artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/4449
_version_ 1855491756026494976
author Ruiz, C.
Asins, María J.
author_browse Asins, María J.
Ruiz, C.
author_facet Ruiz, C.
Asins, María J.
author_sort Ruiz, C.
collection ReDivia
description Five genetic linkage maps were constructed for the parents of three progenies: Citrus aurantium (A) x Poncirus trifoliata var. Flying Dragon (Pa), C. volka-meriana (V) x R trifoliata var. Rubidoux (Pv) and a self-pollination of P. trifoliata var. Flying Dragon (Pp). The number of polymorphic markers assayed ranged from 48 for Pa to 120 for A according to the heterozygosity of each parental. As our focus was on genome comparison, most of the markers were newly generated simple sequence repeats. Inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphisms based on four retrotransposon sequences isolated from Citrus spp were also used to saturate the maps. These polymorphisms were much more frequent in A (53) than in Pa (15) and randomly distributed throughout both genomes. Since comparative genomics and quantitative trait locus analysis applicability depends on the reliability of marker ordering, the causes of variation in marker order were investigated. Around 25% of the markers showed gametal segregation distortions. Segregation distortions were also observed at the zygotic level towards a reduction in the observed frequency of homozygotes from that expected in linkage groups 5 and 7. The presence of balanced lethal factors or gametal incompatibility genes in those genomic regions would explain a zygotic advantage of heterozygotes at these specific regions. Four differences in genomic organization were observed; three are putative translocations and affect homeologous linkage groups 3, 7 and 11, where highly distorted markers are found. Other causes of variation in marker order are also discussed: the introduction of new markers in the map, lowering the LOD score and the mapping software. These results represent the first comparative mapping analysis among Citrus and Poncirus species.
format Artículo
id ReDivia4449
institution Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
record_format dspace
spelling ReDivia44492025-04-25T14:43:34Z Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps Ruiz, C. Asins, María J. Five genetic linkage maps were constructed for the parents of three progenies: Citrus aurantium (A) x Poncirus trifoliata var. Flying Dragon (Pa), C. volka-meriana (V) x R trifoliata var. Rubidoux (Pv) and a self-pollination of P. trifoliata var. Flying Dragon (Pp). The number of polymorphic markers assayed ranged from 48 for Pa to 120 for A according to the heterozygosity of each parental. As our focus was on genome comparison, most of the markers were newly generated simple sequence repeats. Inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphisms based on four retrotransposon sequences isolated from Citrus spp were also used to saturate the maps. These polymorphisms were much more frequent in A (53) than in Pa (15) and randomly distributed throughout both genomes. Since comparative genomics and quantitative trait locus analysis applicability depends on the reliability of marker ordering, the causes of variation in marker order were investigated. Around 25% of the markers showed gametal segregation distortions. Segregation distortions were also observed at the zygotic level towards a reduction in the observed frequency of homozygotes from that expected in linkage groups 5 and 7. The presence of balanced lethal factors or gametal incompatibility genes in those genomic regions would explain a zygotic advantage of heterozygotes at these specific regions. Four differences in genomic organization were observed; three are putative translocations and affect homeologous linkage groups 3, 7 and 11, where highly distorted markers are found. Other causes of variation in marker order are also discussed: the introduction of new markers in the map, lowering the LOD score and the mapping software. These results represent the first comparative mapping analysis among Citrus and Poncirus species. 2017-06-01T10:10:09Z 2017-06-01T10:10:09Z 2003 MAR 2003 article Ruiz, C., Asins, M.J. (2003). Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106(5), 826-836. 0040-5752 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/4449 10.1007/s00122-002-1095-x en openAccess Impreso
spellingShingle Ruiz, C.
Asins, María J.
Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps
title Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps
title_full Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps
title_fullStr Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps
title_short Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps
title_sort comparison between poncirus and citrus genetic linkage maps
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11939/4449
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizc comparisonbetweenponcirusandcitrusgeneticlinkagemaps
AT asinsmariaj comparisonbetweenponcirusandcitrusgeneticlinkagemaps