Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests

The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liang, Jingjing, Crowther, Thomas W., Picard, Nicolas, Wiser, Susan, Zhou, Mo, Alberti, Giorgio, Schulze, Ernst-Detlef, McGuire, A. David, Bozzato, Fabio, Pretzsch, Hans, Peri, Pablo Luis, Reich, Peter B.
Format: Artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9827
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6309/aaf8957
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8957
_version_ 1855484469349187584
author Liang, Jingjing
Crowther, Thomas W.
Picard, Nicolas
Wiser, Susan
Zhou, Mo
Alberti, Giorgio
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef
McGuire, A. David
Bozzato, Fabio
Pretzsch, Hans
Peri, Pablo Luis
Reich, Peter B.
author_browse Alberti, Giorgio
Bozzato, Fabio
Crowther, Thomas W.
Liang, Jingjing
McGuire, A. David
Peri, Pablo Luis
Picard, Nicolas
Pretzsch, Hans
Reich, Peter B.
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef
Wiser, Susan
Zhou, Mo
author_facet Liang, Jingjing
Crowther, Thomas W.
Picard, Nicolas
Wiser, Susan
Zhou, Mo
Alberti, Giorgio
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef
McGuire, A. David
Bozzato, Fabio
Pretzsch, Hans
Peri, Pablo Luis
Reich, Peter B.
author_sort Liang, Jingjing
collection INTA Digital
description The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126 permanent plots, spanning 44 countries and most terrestrial biomes, we reveal a globally consistent positive concave-down BPR, showing that continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone—US$166 billion to 490 billion per year according to our estimation—is more than twice what it would cost to implement effective global conservation. This highlights the need for a worldwide reassessment of biodiversity values, forest management strategies, and conservation priorities.
format Artículo
id INTA9827
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
publisherStr American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format dspace
spelling INTA98272021-07-16T12:31:51Z Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests Liang, Jingjing Crowther, Thomas W. Picard, Nicolas Wiser, Susan Zhou, Mo Alberti, Giorgio Schulze, Ernst-Detlef McGuire, A. David Bozzato, Fabio Pretzsch, Hans Peri, Pablo Luis Reich, Peter B. Biodiversity Production Ecology Forest Ecosystems Deforestation Climate Change Conservation Forest Management Forestry Operations Biodiversidad Producción Ecología Ecosistemas Forestales Deforestación Cambio Climático Conservación Manejo Forestal Operaciones Forestales Socioeconomic Development Global Scale Desarrollo Socioeconómico Escala Global The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126 permanent plots, spanning 44 countries and most terrestrial biomes, we reveal a globally consistent positive concave-down BPR, showing that continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone—US$166 billion to 490 billion per year according to our estimation—is more than twice what it would cost to implement effective global conservation. This highlights the need for a worldwide reassessment of biodiversity values, forest management strategies, and conservation priorities. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Liang, Jingjing. West Virginia University. School of Natural Resources; Estados Unidos Fil: Crowther, Thomas W. Netherlands Institute of Ecology; Países Bajos Fil: Crowther, Thomas W. Yale University. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies; Estados Unidos Fil: Picard, Nicolas. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Forestry Department; Italia Fil: Wiser, Susan. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Zhou, Mo. West Virginia University. School of Natural Resources; Estados Unido Fil: Alberti, Giorgio. University of Udine via delle Scienze. Department of Agri-Food, Animal and Environmental Sciences; Italia. Fil: Schulze, Ernst-Detlef. Max-Planck Institut für Biogeochemie; Alemania Fil: McGuire, A. David. University of Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; Estados Unidos Fil: Bozzato, Fabio. Architecture and Environment Department. Italcementi Group; Italia. Fil: Pretzsch, Hans. Technical University of Munich. Institute of Forest Growth and Yield Science, School of Life Sciences; Alemania Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Reich, Peter B. Western Sydney University. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment; Australia. Fil: Reich, Peter B. University of Minnesota. Department of Forest Resources; Estados Unidos 2021-07-16T12:14:07Z 2021-07-16T12:14:07Z 2016-10-14 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9827 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6309/aaf8957 0036-8075 (print) 1095-9203 (on line) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8957 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf American Association for the Advancement of Science Science 354 (6309) : aaf8957 (October 2016)
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Production
Ecology
Forest Ecosystems
Deforestation
Climate Change
Conservation
Forest Management
Forestry Operations
Biodiversidad
Producción
Ecología
Ecosistemas Forestales
Deforestación
Cambio Climático
Conservación
Manejo Forestal
Operaciones Forestales
Socioeconomic Development
Global Scale
Desarrollo Socioeconómico
Escala Global
Liang, Jingjing
Crowther, Thomas W.
Picard, Nicolas
Wiser, Susan
Zhou, Mo
Alberti, Giorgio
Schulze, Ernst-Detlef
McGuire, A. David
Bozzato, Fabio
Pretzsch, Hans
Peri, Pablo Luis
Reich, Peter B.
Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
title Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
title_full Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
title_fullStr Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
title_full_unstemmed Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
title_short Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
title_sort positive biodiversity productivity relationship predominant in global forests
topic Biodiversity
Production
Ecology
Forest Ecosystems
Deforestation
Climate Change
Conservation
Forest Management
Forestry Operations
Biodiversidad
Producción
Ecología
Ecosistemas Forestales
Deforestación
Cambio Climático
Conservación
Manejo Forestal
Operaciones Forestales
Socioeconomic Development
Global Scale
Desarrollo Socioeconómico
Escala Global
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9827
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6309/aaf8957
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8957
work_keys_str_mv AT liangjingjing positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT crowtherthomasw positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT picardnicolas positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT wisersusan positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT zhoumo positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT albertigiorgio positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT schulzeernstdetlef positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT mcguireadavid positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT bozzatofabio positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT pretzschhans positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT peripabloluis positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests
AT reichpeterb positivebiodiversityproductivityrelationshippredominantinglobalforests