Reply to: Data do not support large-scale oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems.
Hiltbrunner et al. apply a reductionist approach to argue that the evidence for widespread terrestrial oligotrophication2 should be replaced with a two-factor explanation (growth dilution and depositional signatures) that does not invoke reductions in N availability, that is, the supply of N relativ...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9044 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-019-0949-4 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0949-4 |
Similar Items: Reply to: Data do not support large-scale oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems.
- Carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotope composition in plant and soil in Southern Patagonia’s native forests.
- Isotopic evidence for oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems
- Convergence of soil nitrogen isotopes across global climate gradients
- ¿Los isótopos de C y N son útiles para seleccionar por tolerancia al estrés abiótico en agropiro alargado?
- 15N uptake and distribution in grasses growing under Nothofagus antarctica vs. grasses in an open site
- El uso de isótopos radioactivos y de radiaciones en la agricultura tropical