Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership
The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the e...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8810 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2100056X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391 |
| _version_ | 1855484271717777408 |
|---|---|
| author | Boulay, Anne-Marie Drastig, Katrin Amanullah Chapagain, Ashok Charlon, Veronica Civit, Bárbara María DeCamillis, Camillo Souza, Marlos De Hess, Tim Hoekstra, Arjen Y. Ibidhi, Ridha Lathuillière, Michael J. Manzardo, Alessandro McAllister, Tim Morales, Ricardo A. Motoshita, Masaharu Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Pirlo, Giacomo Ridoutt, Brad Russo, Valentina Salmoral, Gloria Singh, Ranvir Vanham, Davy Wiedemann, Stephen Weichao, Zheng Pfister, Stephan |
| author_browse | Amanullah Boulay, Anne-Marie Chapagain, Ashok Charlon, Veronica Civit, Bárbara María DeCamillis, Camillo Drastig, Katrin Hess, Tim Hoekstra, Arjen Y. Ibidhi, Ridha Lathuillière, Michael J. Manzardo, Alessandro McAllister, Tim Morales, Ricardo A. Motoshita, Masaharu Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Pfister, Stephan Pirlo, Giacomo Ridoutt, Brad Russo, Valentina Salmoral, Gloria Singh, Ranvir Souza, Marlos De Vanham, Davy Weichao, Zheng Wiedemann, Stephen |
| author_facet | Boulay, Anne-Marie Drastig, Katrin Amanullah Chapagain, Ashok Charlon, Veronica Civit, Bárbara María DeCamillis, Camillo Souza, Marlos De Hess, Tim Hoekstra, Arjen Y. Ibidhi, Ridha Lathuillière, Michael J. Manzardo, Alessandro McAllister, Tim Morales, Ricardo A. Motoshita, Masaharu Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Pirlo, Giacomo Ridoutt, Brad Russo, Valentina Salmoral, Gloria Singh, Ranvir Vanham, Davy Wiedemann, Stephen Weichao, Zheng Pfister, Stephan |
| author_sort | Boulay, Anne-Marie |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only “blue water”); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including “green” and “blue water” consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA8810 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| publisherStr | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA88102022-09-01T12:48:17Z Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership Boulay, Anne-Marie Drastig, Katrin Amanullah Chapagain, Ashok Charlon, Veronica Civit, Bárbara María DeCamillis, Camillo Souza, Marlos De Hess, Tim Hoekstra, Arjen Y. Ibidhi, Ridha Lathuillière, Michael J. Manzardo, Alessandro McAllister, Tim Morales, Ricardo A. Motoshita, Masaharu Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Pirlo, Giacomo Ridoutt, Brad Russo, Valentina Salmoral, Gloria Singh, Ranvir Vanham, Davy Wiedemann, Stephen Weichao, Zheng Pfister, Stephan Uso del Agua Ganadería Producción Pecuaria Sistemas de Producción Water Use Animal Production Livestock Production Production Systems The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only “blue water”); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including “green” and “blue water” consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. EEA Rafaela Fil: Boulay, Anne-Marie. Sherbrooke University. LIRIDE; Canadá. Fil: Boulay, Anne-Marie. Polytechnique Montreal. CIRAIG; Canadá Fil: Drastig, Katrin. Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy; Alemania Fil: Amanullah. University of Agriculture Peshawar. Faculty of Crop Production Sciences. Department of Agronomy; Paquistán Fil: Chapagain, Ashok. Pacific Institute; Estados Unidos Fil: Charlon, Veronica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Civit, Bárbara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ambiente, Hábitat y Energía; Argentina Fil: DeCamillis, Camillo. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Italia Fil: Souza, Marlos De. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Italia Fil: Hess, Tim. Cranfield University. Cranfield Water Science Institute; Reino Unido Fil: Hoekstra, Arjen Y. University of Twente. Twente Water Centre; Holanda Fil: Hoekstra, Arjen Y. National University of Singapore. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Institute of Water Policy; Singapur Fil: Ibidhi, Ridha. National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia. Department of Animal and Forage Production; Túnez Fil: Lathuillière, Michael J. Stockholm Environment Institute; Suecia Fil: Lathuillière, Michael J. University of British Columbia. Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability; Canadá Fil: Manzardo, Alessandro. University of Padova. Department of Industrial Engineering. CESQA; Italia Fil: McAllister, Tim. Lethbridge Research and Development Centre. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Canadá Fil: Morales, Ricardo A. AgroDer SC; México Fil: Motoshita, Masaharu. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability; Japón Fil: Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale. Embrapa Southeast Livestock; Brasil Fil: Pirlo, Giacomo. Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture. Council for Agricultural Research and Economics; Italia Fil: Ridoutt, Brad. University of the Free State. Department Agricultural Economics; Sudáfrica Fil: Ridoutt, Brad. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). Agriculture and Food; Australia Fil: Russo, Valentina. University of Cape Town. Department of Chemical Engineering. Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group; Sudáfrica Fil: Salmoral, Gloria. Cranfield University. Cranfield Water Science Institute; Reino Unido Fil: Salmoral, Gloria. University of Exeter. Environment and Sustainability Institute; Reino Unido Fil: Salmoral, Gloria. University of Exeter. College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences; Reino Unido Fil: Singh, Ranvir. Massey University. School of Agriculture and Environment; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Vanham, Davy. Joint Research Centre. European Commission; Italia Fil: Wiedemann, Stephen. Integrity Ag and Environment; Australia Fil: Weichao, Zheng. China Agricultural University; China Fil: Pfister, Stephan. ETH-Zürich. Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering; Suiza 2021-03-04T13:17:03Z 2021-03-04T13:17:03Z 2021-05 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8810 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2100056X 1470-160X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Elsevier Ecological Indicators 124 : 107391 (May 2021) |
| spellingShingle | Uso del Agua Ganadería Producción Pecuaria Sistemas de Producción Water Use Animal Production Livestock Production Production Systems Boulay, Anne-Marie Drastig, Katrin Amanullah Chapagain, Ashok Charlon, Veronica Civit, Bárbara María DeCamillis, Camillo Souza, Marlos De Hess, Tim Hoekstra, Arjen Y. Ibidhi, Ridha Lathuillière, Michael J. Manzardo, Alessandro McAllister, Tim Morales, Ricardo A. Motoshita, Masaharu Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale Pirlo, Giacomo Ridoutt, Brad Russo, Valentina Salmoral, Gloria Singh, Ranvir Vanham, Davy Wiedemann, Stephen Weichao, Zheng Pfister, Stephan Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership |
| title | Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership |
| title_full | Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership |
| title_fullStr | Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership |
| title_full_unstemmed | Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership |
| title_short | Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership |
| title_sort | building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains outcome and recommendations from the fao leap partnership |
| topic | Uso del Agua Ganadería Producción Pecuaria Sistemas de Producción Water Use Animal Production Livestock Production Production Systems |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8810 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2100056X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT boulayannemarie buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT drastigkatrin buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT amanullah buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT chapagainashok buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT charlonveronica buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT civitbarbaramaria buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT decamilliscamillo buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT souzamarlosde buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT hesstim buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT hoekstraarjeny buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT ibidhiridha buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT lathuillieremichaelj buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT manzardoalessandro buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT mcallistertim buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT moralesricardoa buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT motoshitamasaharu buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT palharesjuliocesarpascale buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT pirlogiacomo buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT ridouttbrad buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT russovalentina buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT salmoralgloria buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT singhranvir buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT vanhamdavy buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT wiedemannstephen buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT weichaozheng buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership AT pfisterstephan buildingconsensusonwateruseassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemsandsupplychainsoutcomeandrecommendationsfromthefaoleappartnership |