Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina
This work analyzes possible obstacles to developing new products or old merchandise using an innovative method. It will look into stakeholders of fine fiber and meat products from three distinctive socioecological systems. Through three case studies, we explore how natural resources management is c...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Frontiers Media
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8788 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550821/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550821 |
| _version_ | 1855484267890475008 |
|---|---|
| author | Von Thungen, Julieta Martin, Elisa Lanari, Maria Rosa |
| author_browse | Lanari, Maria Rosa Martin, Elisa Von Thungen, Julieta |
| author_facet | Von Thungen, Julieta Martin, Elisa Lanari, Maria Rosa |
| author_sort | Von Thungen, Julieta |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | This work analyzes possible obstacles to developing new products or old merchandise using an innovative method. It will look into stakeholders of fine fiber and meat products from three distinctive socioecological systems. Through three case studies, we explore
how natural resources management is connected to interests, values, and knowledge by stakeholders, which include government, the scientific community, and people with rural livelihoods. The government vertex is the national and provincial authorities involved with decision-makers at the national and provincial level. The Scientific-Technological vertex includes researchers from INTA, CONICET, and Universities. Rural livelihoods include livestock keepers, farmers, and local people with traditional knowledge. We will address the goods and services provided by two species of wild camelids and domestic livestock. The three cases have both similarities and differences in their focus and common ground of controversial spaces. They create complex networks of relationships and bonds leading to diverse outcomes. Top-down or bottom-up experiences hold distinct epistemology and research consequences, they affect rural livelihoods in various ways. For the three rural livelihoods, meaningful regulations should be endogenous social constructions. However, there are no longitudinal studies on the trajectories of these case studies. Long-term multispecies grazing opportunities are available for the three case studies. It depends on how stakeholders identify flexibility in their common ground to enable resilience to catastrophic events. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA8788 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media |
| publisherStr | Frontiers Media |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA87882021-03-02T16:42:28Z Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina Von Thungen, Julieta Martin, Elisa Lanari, Maria Rosa Producción Animal Vicuña Caprinos Guanaco Pastoreo Trashumancia Resiliencia Animal Production Vicunas Goats Guanacos Grazing Transhumance Resilience Región Patagónica This work analyzes possible obstacles to developing new products or old merchandise using an innovative method. It will look into stakeholders of fine fiber and meat products from three distinctive socioecological systems. Through three case studies, we explore how natural resources management is connected to interests, values, and knowledge by stakeholders, which include government, the scientific community, and people with rural livelihoods. The government vertex is the national and provincial authorities involved with decision-makers at the national and provincial level. The Scientific-Technological vertex includes researchers from INTA, CONICET, and Universities. Rural livelihoods include livestock keepers, farmers, and local people with traditional knowledge. We will address the goods and services provided by two species of wild camelids and domestic livestock. The three cases have both similarities and differences in their focus and common ground of controversial spaces. They create complex networks of relationships and bonds leading to diverse outcomes. Top-down or bottom-up experiences hold distinct epistemology and research consequences, they affect rural livelihoods in various ways. For the three rural livelihoods, meaningful regulations should be endogenous social constructions. However, there are no longitudinal studies on the trajectories of these case studies. Long-term multispecies grazing opportunities are available for the three case studies. It depends on how stakeholders identify flexibility in their common ground to enable resilience to catastrophic events. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche Fil: Von Thungen, Julieta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Martin, Elisa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Lanari, Maria Rosa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Área de Recursos Naturales; Argentina 2021-03-02T16:34:44Z 2021-03-02T16:34:44Z 2021-03 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8788 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550821/full 2571-581X https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550821 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Frontiers Media Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5 : Art: 550821 (March 2021) |
| spellingShingle | Producción Animal Vicuña Caprinos Guanaco Pastoreo Trashumancia Resiliencia Animal Production Vicunas Goats Guanacos Grazing Transhumance Resilience Región Patagónica Von Thungen, Julieta Martin, Elisa Lanari, Maria Rosa Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina |
| title | Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina |
| title_full | Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina |
| title_fullStr | Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed | Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina |
| title_short | Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina |
| title_sort | controversies and common ground in wild and domestic fine fiber production in argentina |
| topic | Producción Animal Vicuña Caprinos Guanaco Pastoreo Trashumancia Resiliencia Animal Production Vicunas Goats Guanacos Grazing Transhumance Resilience Región Patagónica |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8788 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550821/full https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550821 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vonthungenjulieta controversiesandcommongroundinwildanddomesticfinefiberproductioninargentina AT martinelisa controversiesandcommongroundinwildanddomesticfinefiberproductioninargentina AT lanarimariarosa controversiesandcommongroundinwildanddomesticfinefiberproductioninargentina |