Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature

1. The avoidance of parasitized or infested hosts, which is a common phenomenon in parasitic wasps and phytophagous insects, may act both intra- and interspecifically. Most studies on chemically-mediated avoidance of interspecific competition in insects have been conducted at the individual level. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devescovi, Francisco, Liendo, María Clara, Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique, Bouvet, Juan Pedro, Milla, Fabian Horacio, Vera, María Teresa, Cladera, Jorge Luis, Segura, Diego Fernando
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8720
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/afe.12111
https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12111
_version_ 1855484254701486080
author Devescovi, Francisco
Liendo, María Clara
Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Bouvet, Juan Pedro
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Vera, María Teresa
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Segura, Diego Fernando
author_browse Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Bouvet, Juan Pedro
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Devescovi, Francisco
Liendo, María Clara
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Segura, Diego Fernando
Vera, María Teresa
author_facet Devescovi, Francisco
Liendo, María Clara
Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Bouvet, Juan Pedro
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Vera, María Teresa
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Segura, Diego Fernando
author_sort Devescovi, Francisco
collection INTA Digital
description 1. The avoidance of parasitized or infested hosts, which is a common phenomenon in parasitic wasps and phytophagous insects, may act both intra- and interspecifically. Most studies on chemically-mediated avoidance of interspecific competition in insects have been conducted at the individual level. The role of this behaviour on the spatial distribution of offspring of sympatric species with overlapping host ranges has been overlooked. 2. In the present study, two analytical approaches were used to investigate the co-infestation patterns of the fruit flies Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), aiming to unravel the importance of cross-species infestation recognition in nature. 3. Guava fruit were sampled in an area of coexistence of these two fruit flies and individually categorized as non-infested, infested by one of the species or infested by both species. The frequency of each type of fruit was compared with the frequency distributions expected under two models: an independent oviposition model and a competition avoidance model. As an alternative approach, co-occurrence patterns were evaluated using null models. 4. The results showed that avoidance of competition could be occurring in nature, although only in a few cases in which infestation levels are moderate. The two approaches revealed that the spatial scale has significant impact on the resulting co-occurrence patterns, such that opposite behaviours towards infested fruit are inferred at the largest (mainly aggregated oviposition pattern) versus the smallest scale (mainly independent oviposition pattern). 5. For the system under investigation, our findings suggest that the avoidance of infested fruit does not contribute, or at least not strongly, to the coexistence of the two species.
format Artículo
id INTA8720
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling INTA87202021-02-23T12:04:20Z Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature Devescovi, Francisco Liendo, María Clara Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique Bouvet, Juan Pedro Milla, Fabian Horacio Vera, María Teresa Cladera, Jorge Luis Segura, Diego Fernando Females Behaviour Pheromones Oviposition Deterrents Hembra Comportamiento Feromonas Disuasores de Oviposición Anastrepha fraterculus Ceratitis capitata 1. The avoidance of parasitized or infested hosts, which is a common phenomenon in parasitic wasps and phytophagous insects, may act both intra- and interspecifically. Most studies on chemically-mediated avoidance of interspecific competition in insects have been conducted at the individual level. The role of this behaviour on the spatial distribution of offspring of sympatric species with overlapping host ranges has been overlooked. 2. In the present study, two analytical approaches were used to investigate the co-infestation patterns of the fruit flies Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), aiming to unravel the importance of cross-species infestation recognition in nature. 3. Guava fruit were sampled in an area of coexistence of these two fruit flies and individually categorized as non-infested, infested by one of the species or infested by both species. The frequency of each type of fruit was compared with the frequency distributions expected under two models: an independent oviposition model and a competition avoidance model. As an alternative approach, co-occurrence patterns were evaluated using null models. 4. The results showed that avoidance of competition could be occurring in nature, although only in a few cases in which infestation levels are moderate. The two approaches revealed that the spatial scale has significant impact on the resulting co-occurrence patterns, such that opposite behaviours towards infested fruit are inferred at the largest (mainly aggregated oviposition pattern) versus the smallest scale (mainly independent oviposition pattern). 5. For the system under investigation, our findings suggest that the avoidance of infested fruit does not contribute, or at least not strongly, to the coexistence of the two species. Instituto de Genética Fil: Devescovi, Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Liendo, Marí­a Clara. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Agronómica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Bouvet, Juan Pedro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concordia; Argentina Fil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina Fil: Vera, Maria Teresa. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina Fil: Segura, Diego Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina 2021-02-23T11:55:39Z 2021-02-23T11:55:39Z 2015-08 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8720 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/afe.12111 1461-9555 https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12111 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Wiley Agricultural and Forest Entomology 17 (3) : 325-335 (Agosto 2015)
spellingShingle Females
Behaviour
Pheromones
Oviposition Deterrents
Hembra
Comportamiento
Feromonas
Disuasores de Oviposición
Anastrepha fraterculus
Ceratitis capitata
Devescovi, Francisco
Liendo, María Clara
Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Bouvet, Juan Pedro
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Vera, María Teresa
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Segura, Diego Fernando
Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
title Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
title_full Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
title_fullStr Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
title_full_unstemmed Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
title_short Fruit infestation patterns by Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata reveal that cross-recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
title_sort fruit infestation patterns by anastrepha fraterculus and ceratitis capitata reveal that cross recognition does not lead to complete avoidance of interspecific competition in nature
topic Females
Behaviour
Pheromones
Oviposition Deterrents
Hembra
Comportamiento
Feromonas
Disuasores de Oviposición
Anastrepha fraterculus
Ceratitis capitata
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8720
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/afe.12111
https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12111
work_keys_str_mv AT devescovifrancisco fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT liendomariaclara fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT bachmannguillermoenrique fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT bouvetjuanpedro fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT millafabianhoracio fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT veramariateresa fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT claderajorgeluis fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature
AT seguradiegofernando fruitinfestationpatternsbyanastrephafraterculusandceratitiscapitatarevealthatcrossrecognitiondoesnotleadtocompleteavoidanceofinterspecificcompetitioninnature