Cover Image
QR Code

Comparing temperature data sources for use in species distribution models: From in‐situ logging to remote sensing

Although species distribution models (SDMs) traditionally link species occurrences to free‐air temperature data at coarse spatio‐temporal resolution, the distribution of organisms might instead be driven by temperatures more proximal to their habitats. Several solutions are currently available, such...

Full description

Main Authors: Lembrechts, Jonas Johan, Lenoir, Jonathan, Roth, Nina, Hattab, Tarek, Milbau, Ann, Haider, Sylvia, Pellissier, Loïc, Pauchard, Aníbal, Ratier Backes, Amanda, Dimarco, Romina Daniela, Núñez, Martín Andrés, Aalto, Juha, Nijs, Ivan
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Bioclimatología
Microclima
Factores Ambientales
Cambio Climático
Bioclimatology
Microclimate
Environmental Factors
Climate Change
Modelos de Distribución de Especies
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8222
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.12974
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12974
Summary:Although species distribution models (SDMs) traditionally link species occurrences to free‐air temperature data at coarse spatio‐temporal resolution, the distribution of organisms might instead be driven by temperatures more proximal to their habitats. Several solutions are currently available, such as downscaled or interpolated coarse‐grained free‐air temperatures, satellite‐measured land surface temperatures (LST) or in‐situ‐measured soil temperatures. A comprehensive comparison of temperature data sources and their performance in SDMs is, however, currently lacking.

Similar Items