Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina

The dry forests of South America are a key player of the global carbon cycle and the regional water cycle, but they are being intensively deforested. We used eddy covariance measurements to compare the temporal patterns of CO2 and water vapour fluxes and their relationships with environmental variab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel, Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago, Magliano, Patricio Nicolás, Figuerola, Patricia, Blanco, Lisandro Javier, Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Formato: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8003
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eco.2244
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2244
_version_ 1855035958638936064
author Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel
Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago
Magliano, Patricio Nicolás
Figuerola, Patricia
Blanco, Lisandro Javier
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
author_browse Blanco, Lisandro Javier
Figuerola, Patricia
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago
Magliano, Patricio Nicolás
Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel
author_facet Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel
Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago
Magliano, Patricio Nicolás
Figuerola, Patricia
Blanco, Lisandro Javier
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
author_sort Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel
collection INTA Digital
description The dry forests of South America are a key player of the global carbon cycle and the regional water cycle, but they are being intensively deforested. We used eddy covariance measurements to compare the temporal patterns of CO2 and water vapour fluxes and their relationships with environmental variables in dry forest and pastures sites of central Argentina. Ecosystem fluxes showed clear contrasts in magnitude, timing and response to environmental controls between ecosystems. The dry forest displayed higher daily gross primary productivity (GPP, 10.6 vs. 7.8 g CO2 m−2 d−1) and ecosystem respiration (Reco, 9.1 vs. 7.0 g CO2 m−2 d−1) and lower net ecosystem exchange (NEE, −1.5 vs. −0.7 g CO2 m−2 d−1) than the pasture. These differences were explained by a lower tolerance of the pasture to cool temperatures and drought. The lowest NEE rates were observed between 26°C and 34°C in the pasture, but below this range, NEE increased sharply, switching to a carbon source with temperatures <20°C. By contrast, the dry forest remained as a strong carbon sink down to 18°C. The pasture also showed a stronger drop of GPP with drought compared with the dry forest, becoming a carbon source with soil wetness <25% of soil available water. Rainfall was strongly coupled with GPP in both ecosystems, but the dry forest responded to longer rainfall integration periods. This study helps to understand how ecosystems can respond to climate change, improve global scale modelling and increase the productivity and resilience of rangelands.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA8003
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling INTA80032023-04-26T19:44:41Z Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago Magliano, Patricio Nicolás Figuerola, Patricia Blanco, Lisandro Javier Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel Bosques Balance Hídrico Dióxido de Carbono Pastizales Lluvia Forests Water Balance Carbon Dioxide Pastures Rain CO2 The dry forests of South America are a key player of the global carbon cycle and the regional water cycle, but they are being intensively deforested. We used eddy covariance measurements to compare the temporal patterns of CO2 and water vapour fluxes and their relationships with environmental variables in dry forest and pastures sites of central Argentina. Ecosystem fluxes showed clear contrasts in magnitude, timing and response to environmental controls between ecosystems. The dry forest displayed higher daily gross primary productivity (GPP, 10.6 vs. 7.8 g CO2 m−2 d−1) and ecosystem respiration (Reco, 9.1 vs. 7.0 g CO2 m−2 d−1) and lower net ecosystem exchange (NEE, −1.5 vs. −0.7 g CO2 m−2 d−1) than the pasture. These differences were explained by a lower tolerance of the pasture to cool temperatures and drought. The lowest NEE rates were observed between 26°C and 34°C in the pasture, but below this range, NEE increased sharply, switching to a carbon source with temperatures <20°C. By contrast, the dry forest remained as a strong carbon sink down to 18°C. The pasture also showed a stronger drop of GPP with drought compared with the dry forest, becoming a carbon source with soil wetness <25% of soil available water. Rainfall was strongly coupled with GPP in both ecosystems, but the dry forest responded to longer rainfall integration periods. This study helps to understand how ecosystems can respond to climate change, improve global scale modelling and increase the productivity and resilience of rangelands. EEA La Rioja Fil: Nosetto, Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Cátedra de Climatología Agrícola; Argentina Fil: Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Chilecito. Instituto de Ambiente de Montaña y Regiones Áridas; Argentina Fil: Magliano, Patricio Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. Departamento de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas; Argentina Fil: Figuerola, Patricia. Universidad Nacional de Chilecito. Instituto de Ambiente de Montaña y Regiones Áridas; Argentina Fil: Blanco, Lisandro Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria La Rioja; Argentina Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis. Grupo de Estudios Ambientales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Luis; Argentina 2020-10-02T20:09:18Z 2020-10-02T20:09:18Z 2020-08 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8003 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eco.2244 1936-0592 https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2244 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Wiley Ecohydrology (First published: 24 August 2020)
spellingShingle Bosques
Balance Hídrico
Dióxido de Carbono
Pastizales
Lluvia
Forests
Water Balance
Carbon Dioxide
Pastures
Rain
CO2
Nosetto, Marcelo Daniel
Luna Toledo, Emanuel Santiago
Magliano, Patricio Nicolás
Figuerola, Patricia
Blanco, Lisandro Javier
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina
title Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina
title_full Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina
title_fullStr Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina
title_short Contrasting CO2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central Argentina
title_sort contrasting co2 and water vapour fluxes in dry forest and pasture sites of central argentina
topic Bosques
Balance Hídrico
Dióxido de Carbono
Pastizales
Lluvia
Forests
Water Balance
Carbon Dioxide
Pastures
Rain
CO2
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8003
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eco.2244
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2244
work_keys_str_mv AT nosettomarcelodaniel contrastingco2andwatervapourfluxesindryforestandpasturesitesofcentralargentina
AT lunatoledoemanuelsantiago contrastingco2andwatervapourfluxesindryforestandpasturesitesofcentralargentina
AT maglianopatricionicolas contrastingco2andwatervapourfluxesindryforestandpasturesitesofcentralargentina
AT figuerolapatricia contrastingco2andwatervapourfluxesindryforestandpasturesitesofcentralargentina
AT blancolisandrojavier contrastingco2andwatervapourfluxesindryforestandpasturesitesofcentralargentina
AT jobbagygampelestebangabriel contrastingco2andwatervapourfluxesindryforestandpasturesitesofcentralargentina