Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes

This study quantified maize (Zea mays L.) water use efficiency for grain yield (WUEg) in response to plant density under contrasting water regimes; and focused on relevant eco-physiologial processes underlying the responses of maize WUEg to plant density (i.e., the proportion of transpiration in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hernandez, Mariano Daniel, Alfonso, Carla Susana, Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro, Cambareri, Matias, Della Maggiora, Aida, Barbieri, Pablo, Echarte, María Mercedes, Echarte, Laura
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7697
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429020302264
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107844
_version_ 1855035904375128064
author Hernandez, Mariano Daniel
Alfonso, Carla Susana
Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro
Cambareri, Matias
Della Maggiora, Aida
Barbieri, Pablo
Echarte, María Mercedes
Echarte, Laura
author_browse Alfonso, Carla Susana
Barbieri, Pablo
Cambareri, Matias
Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro
Della Maggiora, Aida
Echarte, Laura
Echarte, María Mercedes
Hernandez, Mariano Daniel
author_facet Hernandez, Mariano Daniel
Alfonso, Carla Susana
Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro
Cambareri, Matias
Della Maggiora, Aida
Barbieri, Pablo
Echarte, María Mercedes
Echarte, Laura
author_sort Hernandez, Mariano Daniel
collection INTA Digital
description This study quantified maize (Zea mays L.) water use efficiency for grain yield (WUEg) in response to plant density under contrasting water regimes; and focused on relevant eco-physiologial processes underlying the responses of maize WUEg to plant density (i.e., the proportion of transpiration in the total water used, T/ET; and the crop growth rate during the critical period for kernel set, CGRcp). Maize crops were grown at Balcarce, Argentina during two seasons. Treatments included two water regimes (i.e., rainfed and irrigated) and three plant densities (4, 8 and 12 plants m−2). Measurements comprised (i) soil water content and iPAR during the whole growing season, (ii) shoot biomass around silking and (iii) grain yield and shoot biomass at physiological maturity. Crop ET was calculated by means of water balance and soil evaporation was measured with micro-lysimeters. The response of WUEg to increasing plant density from 4 to 8 or from 4 to 12 plants m−2 was influenced by seasonal water supply. Both seasonal ET and T/ET consistently increased with plant densities across contrasting water regimes. Although increments in T/ET partition were in accordance with increasing iPAR, they did not promote higher WUEg at low water supply. Grain yield increased with plant density, except in the driest environment where no response of either grain yield nor WUEg to plant density was detected. Our results showed that the response of CGRcp to plant density increments (i) depended on the water supply, and (ii) contributed to explain WUEg response to plant density under contrasting water supplies.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA7697
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling INTA76972020-08-10T19:22:36Z Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes Hernandez, Mariano Daniel Alfonso, Carla Susana Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro Cambareri, Matias Della Maggiora, Aida Barbieri, Pablo Echarte, María Mercedes Echarte, Laura Maíz Evaporación Transpiración Relaciones Planta Agua Radiación Espaciamiento Rendimiento de Cultivos Maize Evaporation Traspiration Plant Water Relations Radiation Spacing Crop Yield Densidad de Plantación This study quantified maize (Zea mays L.) water use efficiency for grain yield (WUEg) in response to plant density under contrasting water regimes; and focused on relevant eco-physiologial processes underlying the responses of maize WUEg to plant density (i.e., the proportion of transpiration in the total water used, T/ET; and the crop growth rate during the critical period for kernel set, CGRcp). Maize crops were grown at Balcarce, Argentina during two seasons. Treatments included two water regimes (i.e., rainfed and irrigated) and three plant densities (4, 8 and 12 plants m−2). Measurements comprised (i) soil water content and iPAR during the whole growing season, (ii) shoot biomass around silking and (iii) grain yield and shoot biomass at physiological maturity. Crop ET was calculated by means of water balance and soil evaporation was measured with micro-lysimeters. The response of WUEg to increasing plant density from 4 to 8 or from 4 to 12 plants m−2 was influenced by seasonal water supply. Both seasonal ET and T/ET consistently increased with plant densities across contrasting water regimes. Although increments in T/ET partition were in accordance with increasing iPAR, they did not promote higher WUEg at low water supply. Grain yield increased with plant density, except in the driest environment where no response of either grain yield nor WUEg to plant density was detected. Our results showed that the response of CGRcp to plant density increments (i) depended on the water supply, and (ii) contributed to explain WUEg response to plant density under contrasting water supplies. EEA Balcarce Fil: Hernández, Mariano D. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Alfonso, Carla S. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Cambareri, Matías. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Della Maggiora, Aída. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Barbieri, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Echarte, María Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Echarte, Laura. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. 2020-08-10T19:14:32Z 2020-08-10T19:14:32Z 2020-09 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7697 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429020302264 0378-4290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107844 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Elsevier Field Crops Research 254 : 107844 (September 2020)
spellingShingle Maíz
Evaporación
Transpiración
Relaciones Planta Agua
Radiación
Espaciamiento
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Maize
Evaporation
Traspiration
Plant Water Relations
Radiation
Spacing
Crop Yield
Densidad de Plantación
Hernandez, Mariano Daniel
Alfonso, Carla Susana
Cerrudo, Aníbal Alejandro
Cambareri, Matias
Della Maggiora, Aida
Barbieri, Pablo
Echarte, María Mercedes
Echarte, Laura
Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
title Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
title_full Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
title_fullStr Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
title_full_unstemmed Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
title_short Eco-physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
title_sort eco physiological processes underlying maize water use efficiency response to plant density under contrasting water regimes
topic Maíz
Evaporación
Transpiración
Relaciones Planta Agua
Radiación
Espaciamiento
Rendimiento de Cultivos
Maize
Evaporation
Traspiration
Plant Water Relations
Radiation
Spacing
Crop Yield
Densidad de Plantación
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7697
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429020302264
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107844
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezmarianodaniel ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT alfonsocarlasusana ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT cerrudoanibalalejandro ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT cambarerimatias ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT dellamaggioraaida ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT barbieripablo ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT echartemariamercedes ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes
AT echartelaura ecophysiologicalprocessesunderlyingmaizewateruseefficiencyresponsetoplantdensityundercontrastingwaterregimes