Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina

Payment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selectio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M., Hiller, Josh, Branch, Lyn C., Núñez Godoy, Cristina, Siddiqui, Sharmin, Volante, Jose Norberto, Soto, José R.
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7468
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837719306337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596
_version_ 1855035864284921856
author Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Hiller, Josh
Branch, Lyn C.
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Volante, Jose Norberto
Soto, José R.
author_browse Branch, Lyn C.
Hiller, Josh
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Soto, José R.
Volante, Jose Norberto
author_facet Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Hiller, Josh
Branch, Lyn C.
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Volante, Jose Norberto
Soto, José R.
author_sort Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
collection INTA Digital
description Payment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selection. Spatial adverse selection occurs when landowners are more likely to enroll parcels with low deforestation pressure than parcels with high deforestation pressure. Temporal adverse selection arises when parcels are enrolled for short time periods. In both cases, financial resources are allocated without having a sizeable impact on long-term land use change. Improving program performance to overcome these shortcomings requires understanding attributes of landowners and their parcels across large scales to identify spatial and temporal enrollment patterns that drive adverse selection. In this paper, we examine these patterns in Argentina’s PES program in Chaco forest, a global deforestation hotspot. Our study area covers 252,319 km2. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that large parcels of enrolled land and parcels owned by absentee landowners exhibit greater evidence of spatiotemporal adverse selection than smaller parcels or parcels owned by local landowners. Furthermore, parcels managed under land use plans for conservation and restoration are more likely to be associated with adverse selection than parcels managed for financial returns such as harvest of non-timber forest products, silviculture, and silvopasture. However, prior to recommending that PES programs focus on land uses with higher potential earnings, a greater understanding is needed of the degree to which these land uses meet ecological and biodiversity goals of PES programs. We suggest that increased spatial targeting of enrollment, along with enrollment of local landowners and further incentives for land uses that support conservation and restoration, could promote long-term conservation of forest lands.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA7468
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling INTA74682020-06-24T18:11:29Z Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M. Hiller, Josh Branch, Lyn C. Núñez Godoy, Cristina Siddiqui, Sharmin Volante, Jose Norberto Soto, José R. Servicios de los Ecosistemas Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos Políticas Ecosystem Services Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies Argentina Payment for ecosystem services schemes (PES) are lauded as a market-based solution to curtail deforestation and restore degraded ecosystems. However, PES programs often fail to conserve sites under strong long-term deforestation pressures. Underperformance, in part, is likely due to adverse selection. Spatial adverse selection occurs when landowners are more likely to enroll parcels with low deforestation pressure than parcels with high deforestation pressure. Temporal adverse selection arises when parcels are enrolled for short time periods. In both cases, financial resources are allocated without having a sizeable impact on long-term land use change. Improving program performance to overcome these shortcomings requires understanding attributes of landowners and their parcels across large scales to identify spatial and temporal enrollment patterns that drive adverse selection. In this paper, we examine these patterns in Argentina’s PES program in Chaco forest, a global deforestation hotspot. Our study area covers 252,319 km2. Results from multinomial logistic regression models showed that large parcels of enrolled land and parcels owned by absentee landowners exhibit greater evidence of spatiotemporal adverse selection than smaller parcels or parcels owned by local landowners. Furthermore, parcels managed under land use plans for conservation and restoration are more likely to be associated with adverse selection than parcels managed for financial returns such as harvest of non-timber forest products, silviculture, and silvopasture. However, prior to recommending that PES programs focus on land uses with higher potential earnings, a greater understanding is needed of the degree to which these land uses meet ecological and biodiversity goals of PES programs. We suggest that increased spatial targeting of enrollment, along with enrollment of local landowners and further incentives for land uses that support conservation and restoration, could promote long-term conservation of forest lands. EEA Salta Fil: Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio M. University of Arizona. Institute of the Environment and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy. Bridging Biodiversity and Conservation Science; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA; Argentina. Universidad Católica de Salta; Argentina Fil: Hiller, Josh. Adelphi University. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science; Estados Unidos Fil: Branch, Lyn C. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos Fil: Núñez Godoy, Cristina. University of Florida. School of Natural Resources and Environment; Estados Undos. University of Florida. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Estados Unidos Fil: Siddiqui, Sharmin. University of Florida. Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment. Environmental Engineering Sciences Department; Estados Unidos Fil: Volante, Jose Norberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina Fil: Soto, José R. University of Arizona. School of Natural Resources & The Environment; Estados Unidos 2020-06-24T18:04:49Z 2020-06-24T18:04:49Z 2020-06 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7468 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837719306337 0264-8377 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Elsevier Land Use Policy 95 : 104596 (June 2020)
spellingShingle Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos
Políticas
Ecosystem Services
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Policies
Argentina
Núñez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Hiller, Josh
Branch, Lyn C.
Núñez Godoy, Cristina
Siddiqui, Sharmin
Volante, Jose Norberto
Soto, José R.
Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_full Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_fullStr Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_short Policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in Argentina
title_sort policy lessons from spatiotemporal enrollment patterns of payment for ecosystem service programs in argentina
topic Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Pago por Servicios Ecosistémicos
Políticas
Ecosystem Services
Payments for Ecosystem Services
Policies
Argentina
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7468
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837719306337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104596
work_keys_str_mv AT nunezregueiromauriciom policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina
AT hillerjosh policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina
AT branchlync policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina
AT nunezgodoycristina policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina
AT siddiquisharmin policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina
AT volantejosenorberto policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina
AT sotojoser policylessonsfromspatiotemporalenrollmentpatternsofpaymentforecosystemserviceprogramsinargentina