Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability
Nutrient enrichment is associated with plant invasions and biodiversity loss. Functional trait advantages may predict the ascendancy of invasive plants following nutrient enrichment but this is rarely tested. Here, we investigate (a) whether dominant native and non‐native plants differ in important...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7036 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13092 https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13092 |
Ejemplares similares: Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability
- Leaf nutrients, not specific leaf area, are consistent indicators of elevated nutrient inputs
- Local nutrient addition drives plant biodiversity losses but not biotic homogenization in global grasslands
- Microbial processing of plant remains is co‐limited by multiple nutrients in global grasslands
- Sensitivity of global soil carbon stocks to combined nutrient enrichment
- Aridity modulates grassland biomass responses to combined drought and nutrient addition
- Expresión Elemental de Nutrientes