Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability
Nutrient enrichment is associated with plant invasions and biodiversity loss. Functional trait advantages may predict the ascendancy of invasive plants following nutrient enrichment but this is rarely tested. Here, we investigate (a) whether dominant native and non‐native plants differ in important...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7036 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13092 https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13092 |
Ejemplares similares: Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability
- Leaf nutrients, not specific leaf area, are consistent indicators of elevated nutrient inputs
- Local nutrient addition drives plant biodiversity losses but not biotic homogenization in global grasslands
- Aridity modulates grassland biomass responses to combined drought and nutrient addition
- Microbial processing of plant remains is co‐limited by multiple nutrients in global grasslands
- Determination of abundance and symbiotic effectiveness of native rhizobia nodulating soybean and other legumes in Rwanda
- Photosynthetic adaptation to nutrient stress