Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest

The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel, Binkley, Dan, Bauerle, William
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: Elsevier 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112719323205
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891
_version_ 1855035736392204288
author Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
Binkley, Dan
Bauerle, William
author_browse Bauerle, William
Binkley, Dan
Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
author_facet Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
Binkley, Dan
Bauerle, William
author_sort Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
collection INTA Digital
description The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA6779
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling INTA67792020-02-17T14:23:32Z Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel Binkley, Dan Bauerle, William Bosques Pinus Pinares Pinus Ponderosa Crecimiento Ecología Forests Pine Forests Growth Ecology The growth of a stand is the sum of the growth of individual trees. Growth of individual trees can be explained by the amount of resources captured and how efficiently those resources are used (production ecology). The relationship between the contribution of a tree to stand growth relative to the contribution to stand biomass is expressed by the growth dominance. Patterns of growth dominance vary among tree species and stand age, suggesting that differences in production ecology underlie the observed patterns of growth dominance within stands. We explored the production ecology in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. Growth dominance was strongly negative (−0.22) and was the outcome of a less-than-proportional increase of tree growth as a function of tree size. Dominant trees were almost 5 times larger than suppressed trees (1024 vs. 211 kg tree−1) but grew only about 2 times more than suppressed trees (4.3 vs. 1.9 kg tree−1 year−1). Dominant trees captured a lessthan-proportional amount of light relative to their size (90.4 vs. 20.9 GJ year−1 tree−1) and light use efficiency declined with tree size. Suppressed trees were twice as efficient as dominant trees (0.11 vs. 0.05 kg[wood] GJ [PAR]−1). Our results highlight the link between growth dominance, competition for resources, and the pattern of light use efficiency among large versus small trees. EEA Delta del Paraná Fil: Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná; Argentina. Colorado State University. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability. Graduate Degree Program in Ecology; Estados Unidos Fil: Binkley, Dan. Northern Arizona University. School of Forestry; Estados Unidos Fil: Bauerle, William. Colorado State University. Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; Estados Unidos 2020-02-17T14:21:27Z 2020-02-17T14:21:27Z 2020-01 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112719323205 0378-1127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Elsevier Forest Ecology and Management 460 : 117891 (2020)
spellingShingle Bosques
Pinus
Pinares
Pinus Ponderosa
Crecimiento
Ecología
Forests
Pine Forests
Growth
Ecology
Fernandez Tschieder, Ezequiel
Binkley, Dan
Bauerle, William
Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_full Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_fullStr Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_full_unstemmed Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_short Production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
title_sort production ecology and reverse growth dominance in an old growth ponderosa pine forest
topic Bosques
Pinus
Pinares
Pinus Ponderosa
Crecimiento
Ecología
Forests
Pine Forests
Growth
Ecology
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6779
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112719323205
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117891
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandeztschiederezequiel productionecologyandreversegrowthdominanceinanoldgrowthponderosapineforest
AT binkleydan productionecologyandreversegrowthdominanceinanoldgrowthponderosapineforest
AT bauerlewilliam productionecologyandreversegrowthdominanceinanoldgrowthponderosapineforest