How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?

The basis and essence of life on earth depends on soil health, and its main indicator is the soil organic carbon (SOC) content. Hence, SOC stock is a key component for the supply of many ecosystem services (SOC-mediated ES), such as erosion protection, nutrient cycling, water regulation, and climate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Villarino, Sebastian, Studdert, Guillermo, Laterra, Pedro
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: Elsevier 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X19302742
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5075
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.027
_version_ 1855035434412802048
author Villarino, Sebastian
Studdert, Guillermo
Laterra, Pedro
author_browse Laterra, Pedro
Studdert, Guillermo
Villarino, Sebastian
author_facet Villarino, Sebastian
Studdert, Guillermo
Laterra, Pedro
author_sort Villarino, Sebastian
collection INTA Digital
description The basis and essence of life on earth depends on soil health, and its main indicator is the soil organic carbon (SOC) content. Hence, SOC stock is a key component for the supply of many ecosystem services (SOC-mediated ES), such as erosion protection, nutrient cycling, water regulation, and climate regulation. Land use changes from natural ecosystems into agricultural systems generally deplete SOC stocks. Therefore, agricultural production usually involves trade-off relations with SOC-mediated ES supply. This paper assessed the trade-offs between agricultural production and SOC-mediated ES supply in six sub-regions of Argentina: East Southern Pampa, West Southern Pampa, Flooding Pampa, Central Pampa, Rolling Pampa and Semiarid Chaco. In the Semiarid Chaco, overall SOC-mediated ES supply had the highest sensitivity to SOC changes, and the lowest sensitivity to natural cover removal. In East Southern Pampa, overall SOC-mediated ES supply had the lowest sensitivity to SOC changes and the highest to natural cover removal. The differences in sensitivity of overall SOC-mediated ES supply to the changes in SOC could be explained by soil texture, which is finer at East Southern Pampa. The differences in sensitivity of overall SOC-mediated ES supply to natural cover removal could be associated with the initial SOC stocks, which is lower in the Semiarid Chaco. The high sensitivity of SOC-mediated ES to SOC change and the low levels of SOC-mediated ES supply found in the Semiarid Chaco sub-region suggests that it is a highly fragile environment. The agricultural expansion over natural areas led to trade-offs between production and SOC-mediated ES supply. However, increasing crop yields would lead to win-win situations, by positive effects on agricultural production and SOC-mediated ES supply. Hence, agricultural production should be increased by increasing crop yields rather than expanding cropland and/or pasture over natural areas.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA5075
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling INTA50752019-05-08T15:28:51Z How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production? Villarino, Sebastian Studdert, Guillermo Laterra, Pedro Suelo Utilización de la Tierra Materia Orgánica del Suelo Deforestación Servicios de los Ecosistemas Soil Land Use Soil Organic Matter Deforestation Ecosystem Service Carbon Carbono Región Pampeana Sustentabilidad The basis and essence of life on earth depends on soil health, and its main indicator is the soil organic carbon (SOC) content. Hence, SOC stock is a key component for the supply of many ecosystem services (SOC-mediated ES), such as erosion protection, nutrient cycling, water regulation, and climate regulation. Land use changes from natural ecosystems into agricultural systems generally deplete SOC stocks. Therefore, agricultural production usually involves trade-off relations with SOC-mediated ES supply. This paper assessed the trade-offs between agricultural production and SOC-mediated ES supply in six sub-regions of Argentina: East Southern Pampa, West Southern Pampa, Flooding Pampa, Central Pampa, Rolling Pampa and Semiarid Chaco. In the Semiarid Chaco, overall SOC-mediated ES supply had the highest sensitivity to SOC changes, and the lowest sensitivity to natural cover removal. In East Southern Pampa, overall SOC-mediated ES supply had the lowest sensitivity to SOC changes and the highest to natural cover removal. The differences in sensitivity of overall SOC-mediated ES supply to the changes in SOC could be explained by soil texture, which is finer at East Southern Pampa. The differences in sensitivity of overall SOC-mediated ES supply to natural cover removal could be associated with the initial SOC stocks, which is lower in the Semiarid Chaco. The high sensitivity of SOC-mediated ES to SOC change and the low levels of SOC-mediated ES supply found in the Semiarid Chaco sub-region suggests that it is a highly fragile environment. The agricultural expansion over natural areas led to trade-offs between production and SOC-mediated ES supply. However, increasing crop yields would lead to win-win situations, by positive effects on agricultural production and SOC-mediated ES supply. Hence, agricultural production should be increased by increasing crop yields rather than expanding cropland and/or pasture over natural areas. EEA Balcarce Fil: Villarino, Sebastián Horacio. Unidad Integrada Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce, Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Studdert, Guillermo. Unidad Integrada Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce, Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: Laterra, Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Bariloche; Argentina. 2019-05-08T15:20:01Z 2019-05-08T15:20:01Z 2019-08 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X19302742 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5075 1470-160X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.027 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Elsevier Ecological Indicators 103 : 280-288 (August 2019)
spellingShingle Suelo
Utilización de la Tierra
Materia Orgánica del Suelo
Deforestación
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Soil
Land Use
Soil Organic Matter
Deforestation
Ecosystem Service
Carbon
Carbono
Región Pampeana
Sustentabilidad
Villarino, Sebastian
Studdert, Guillermo
Laterra, Pedro
How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
title How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
title_full How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
title_fullStr How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
title_full_unstemmed How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
title_short How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
title_sort how does soil organic carbon mediate trade offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production
topic Suelo
Utilización de la Tierra
Materia Orgánica del Suelo
Deforestación
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Soil
Land Use
Soil Organic Matter
Deforestation
Ecosystem Service
Carbon
Carbono
Región Pampeana
Sustentabilidad
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X19302742
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5075
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.027
work_keys_str_mv AT villarinosebastian howdoessoilorganiccarbonmediatetradeoffsbetweenecosystemservicesandagriculturalproduction
AT studdertguillermo howdoessoilorganiccarbonmediatetradeoffsbetweenecosystemservicesandagriculturalproduction
AT laterrapedro howdoessoilorganiccarbonmediatetradeoffsbetweenecosystemservicesandagriculturalproduction