Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands

Wetlands are ecosystems that play a key role in maintaining biodiversity and associated economies (e.g. agriculture and livestock) because they are reservoirs of water and carbon. Globally, these environments have been largely deteriorated, so their sustainable use takes on special importance. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weigandt, Mariana Noemi, Gyenge, Javier, Fernandez, María Elena, Varela, Santiago Agustin, Schlichter, Tomas Miguel
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.1512
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4931
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1512
_version_ 1855483522495545344
author Weigandt, Mariana Noemi
Gyenge, Javier
Fernandez, María Elena
Varela, Santiago Agustin
Schlichter, Tomas Miguel
author_browse Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Schlichter, Tomas Miguel
Varela, Santiago Agustin
Weigandt, Mariana Noemi
author_facet Weigandt, Mariana Noemi
Gyenge, Javier
Fernandez, María Elena
Varela, Santiago Agustin
Schlichter, Tomas Miguel
author_sort Weigandt, Mariana Noemi
collection INTA Digital
description Wetlands are ecosystems that play a key role in maintaining biodiversity and associated economies (e.g. agriculture and livestock) because they are reservoirs of water and carbon. Globally, these environments have been largely deteriorated, so their sustainable use takes on special importance. This study examined the effect on water recharge of the replacement of natural grassland by pine afforestation on hillsides adjacent to two Patagonian wetlands with contrasting rainfall. Results showed that independently of the rainfall at the site considered, canopies with high coverage values (90%) intercept 40% of the precipitation. This percentage is significantly reduced when canopy coverage is near 70%. Considering forested and grassland hillsides, groundwater drainage showed different patterns, consisting of only a few millimetres in the seasons recorded. Surface runoff was not a significant source of recharge for these systems in spring and summer, showing similar values in forested and grassland hillsides. Differences found in the recharge water variables between afforestation and grassland conditions cannot be directly associated with the vegetation in areas surrounding the wetlands. These systems showed high complexity, requiring site‐specific analysis to determine what the impact of afforestation will be on their hydrology
format Artículo
id INTA4931
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling INTA49312019-04-17T13:40:26Z Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands Weigandt, Mariana Noemi Gyenge, Javier Fernandez, María Elena Varela, Santiago Agustin Schlichter, Tomas Miguel Tierras Húmedas Aforestación Agua Ecosistema Ordenación Territorial Wetlands Afforestation Water Ecosystems Land Use Planning Región Patagónica Wetlands are ecosystems that play a key role in maintaining biodiversity and associated economies (e.g. agriculture and livestock) because they are reservoirs of water and carbon. Globally, these environments have been largely deteriorated, so their sustainable use takes on special importance. This study examined the effect on water recharge of the replacement of natural grassland by pine afforestation on hillsides adjacent to two Patagonian wetlands with contrasting rainfall. Results showed that independently of the rainfall at the site considered, canopies with high coverage values (90%) intercept 40% of the precipitation. This percentage is significantly reduced when canopy coverage is near 70%. Considering forested and grassland hillsides, groundwater drainage showed different patterns, consisting of only a few millimetres in the seasons recorded. Surface runoff was not a significant source of recharge for these systems in spring and summer, showing similar values in forested and grassland hillsides. Differences found in the recharge water variables between afforestation and grassland conditions cannot be directly associated with the vegetation in areas surrounding the wetlands. These systems showed high complexity, requiring site‐specific analysis to determine what the impact of afforestation will be on their hydrology EEA Bariloche Fil: Weigandt, Mariana Noemi. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Gyenge, Javier Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Agencia de Extensión Rural Tandil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Fernandez, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Agencia de Extensión Rural Tandil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Varela, Santiago Agustin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina Fil: Schlichter, Tomas Miguel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología Forestal; Argentina 2019-04-17T13:38:37Z 2019-04-17T13:38:37Z 2015-04 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.1512 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4931 1936-0584 1936-0592 https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1512 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Wiley Ecohydrology 8 (3) : 416-425 (April 2015)
spellingShingle Tierras Húmedas
Aforestación
Agua
Ecosistema
Ordenación Territorial
Wetlands
Afforestation
Water
Ecosystems
Land Use Planning
Región Patagónica
Weigandt, Mariana Noemi
Gyenge, Javier
Fernandez, María Elena
Varela, Santiago Agustin
Schlichter, Tomas Miguel
Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands
title Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands
title_full Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands
title_fullStr Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands
title_full_unstemmed Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands
title_short Afforestations and wetlands, are they a good combination? Study of water fluxes in two cases of Patagonian wetlands
title_sort afforestations and wetlands are they a good combination study of water fluxes in two cases of patagonian wetlands
topic Tierras Húmedas
Aforestación
Agua
Ecosistema
Ordenación Territorial
Wetlands
Afforestation
Water
Ecosystems
Land Use Planning
Región Patagónica
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.1512
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4931
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1512
work_keys_str_mv AT weigandtmariananoemi afforestationsandwetlandsaretheyagoodcombinationstudyofwaterfluxesintwocasesofpatagonianwetlands
AT gyengejavier afforestationsandwetlandsaretheyagoodcombinationstudyofwaterfluxesintwocasesofpatagonianwetlands
AT fernandezmariaelena afforestationsandwetlandsaretheyagoodcombinationstudyofwaterfluxesintwocasesofpatagonianwetlands
AT varelasantiagoagustin afforestationsandwetlandsaretheyagoodcombinationstudyofwaterfluxesintwocasesofpatagonianwetlands
AT schlichtertomasmiguel afforestationsandwetlandsaretheyagoodcombinationstudyofwaterfluxesintwocasesofpatagonianwetlands