Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages
Experiments (Exp) I and II were conducted to compare raw whole soya beans (WSB), roasted (rWSB) or other protein sources as supplements of low‐quality forages fed ad libitum to beef cattle, upon DM intake (DMI), ruminal and blood parameters, and animal performance. Exp I: treatments for wheat straw...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2885 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpn.12761 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12761 |
| _version_ | 1855483138703097856 |
|---|---|
| author | Arelovich, Hugo Mario Lagrange, Sebastian Pablo Torre, R. Martinez, Marcela F. Laborde, Hugo Eduardo |
| author_browse | Arelovich, Hugo Mario Laborde, Hugo Eduardo Lagrange, Sebastian Pablo Martinez, Marcela F. Torre, R. |
| author_facet | Arelovich, Hugo Mario Lagrange, Sebastian Pablo Torre, R. Martinez, Marcela F. Laborde, Hugo Eduardo |
| author_sort | Arelovich, Hugo Mario |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Experiments (Exp) I and II were conducted to compare raw whole soya beans (WSB), roasted (rWSB) or other protein sources as supplements of low‐quality forages fed ad libitum to beef cattle, upon DM intake (DMI), ruminal and blood parameters, and animal performance. Exp I: treatments for wheat straw fed to four ruminally cannulated steers were (i) Control‐WS: no supplement; (ii) WSB‐WS: whole soya beans; (iii) rWSB‐WS: roasted WSB; and (iv) SBM‐WS: soybean meal–wheat midds mixture; all fed at 1.4 kg DM/day. Exp II: 12 steers grazed deferred grain sorghum (DS) receiving these treatments: (i) Control‐DS: no supplement; (ii) WSB‐DS: 1.26 kg DM/day whole soya beans; and (iii) SFM‐DS: 1.35 kg DM/day of sunflower meal. In Exp I, WS DMI resulted 47, 52 and 41% greater for WSB‐WS, rWSB‐WS and SBM‐WS, respectively, than Control‐WS (p < .05). In Exp II, the DMI of DS was unaffected by supplementation; a substitution of DS by supplement was found for WSB‐DS (p < .05); however, total diet and digestible DMI increased with supplementation (p < .05). Rumen pH in Exp I remained unaffected by supplementation, but N‐NH3 as well as blood urea‐N in Exp II increased (p < .05). In Exp II, average daily weight gains improved similarly with both supplements compared with Control‐DS. Additionally, feed‐to‐gain ratio decreased (p < .05), being lower for WSB‐DS (8.3) vs. SFM‐DS (9.9). Roasting effects of WSB as a supplement for low‐quality forages were not detected, and all protein sources increased total diet DMI and forage utilization. Only moderate cattle weight gains could be expected for unsupplemented DS. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA2885 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateRange | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA28852024-01-10T10:42:33Z Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages Arelovich, Hugo Mario Lagrange, Sebastian Pablo Torre, R. Martinez, Marcela F. Laborde, Hugo Eduardo Ganado Bovino Ganado de Carne Alimentación de los Animales Soja Suplementos Forrajes Calidad Cattle Beef Cattle Animal Feeding Soybeans Supplements Forage Quality Suplementos Experiments (Exp) I and II were conducted to compare raw whole soya beans (WSB), roasted (rWSB) or other protein sources as supplements of low‐quality forages fed ad libitum to beef cattle, upon DM intake (DMI), ruminal and blood parameters, and animal performance. Exp I: treatments for wheat straw fed to four ruminally cannulated steers were (i) Control‐WS: no supplement; (ii) WSB‐WS: whole soya beans; (iii) rWSB‐WS: roasted WSB; and (iv) SBM‐WS: soybean meal–wheat midds mixture; all fed at 1.4 kg DM/day. Exp II: 12 steers grazed deferred grain sorghum (DS) receiving these treatments: (i) Control‐DS: no supplement; (ii) WSB‐DS: 1.26 kg DM/day whole soya beans; and (iii) SFM‐DS: 1.35 kg DM/day of sunflower meal. In Exp I, WS DMI resulted 47, 52 and 41% greater for WSB‐WS, rWSB‐WS and SBM‐WS, respectively, than Control‐WS (p < .05). In Exp II, the DMI of DS was unaffected by supplementation; a substitution of DS by supplement was found for WSB‐DS (p < .05); however, total diet and digestible DMI increased with supplementation (p < .05). Rumen pH in Exp I remained unaffected by supplementation, but N‐NH3 as well as blood urea‐N in Exp II increased (p < .05). In Exp II, average daily weight gains improved similarly with both supplements compared with Control‐DS. Additionally, feed‐to‐gain ratio decreased (p < .05), being lower for WSB‐DS (8.3) vs. SFM‐DS (9.9). Roasting effects of WSB as a supplement for low‐quality forages were not detected, and all protein sources increased total diet DMI and forage utilization. Only moderate cattle weight gains could be expected for unsupplemented DS. EEA Bordenave Fil: Arelovich, Hugo Mario. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina Fil: Lagrange, Sebastian Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentina Fil: Torre, R. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bordenave; Argentina Fil: Martinez, Marcela F. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Agronomía; Argentina Fil: Laborde, Hugo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida; Argentina 2018-07-26T13:33:45Z 2018-07-26T13:33:45Z 2018-02 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2885 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpn.12761 0931-2439 1439-0396 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12761 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 102 (1) : e421-e430 (February 2018) |
| spellingShingle | Ganado Bovino Ganado de Carne Alimentación de los Animales Soja Suplementos Forrajes Calidad Cattle Beef Cattle Animal Feeding Soybeans Supplements Forage Quality Suplementos Arelovich, Hugo Mario Lagrange, Sebastian Pablo Torre, R. Martinez, Marcela F. Laborde, Hugo Eduardo Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages |
| title | Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages |
| title_full | Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages |
| title_fullStr | Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages |
| title_full_unstemmed | Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages |
| title_short | Feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low‐quality forages |
| title_sort | feeding value of whole raw soya beans as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming low quality forages |
| topic | Ganado Bovino Ganado de Carne Alimentación de los Animales Soja Suplementos Forrajes Calidad Cattle Beef Cattle Animal Feeding Soybeans Supplements Forage Quality Suplementos |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2885 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpn.12761 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12761 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arelovichhugomario feedingvalueofwholerawsoyabeansasaproteinsupplementforbeefcattleconsuminglowqualityforages AT lagrangesebastianpablo feedingvalueofwholerawsoyabeansasaproteinsupplementforbeefcattleconsuminglowqualityforages AT torrer feedingvalueofwholerawsoyabeansasaproteinsupplementforbeefcattleconsuminglowqualityforages AT martinezmarcelaf feedingvalueofwholerawsoyabeansasaproteinsupplementforbeefcattleconsuminglowqualityforages AT labordehugoeduardo feedingvalueofwholerawsoyabeansasaproteinsupplementforbeefcattleconsuminglowqualityforages |