Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?

A national “Forest Law” passed in Argentina in 2007 mandated provincial governments to set up and implement land use planning processes in order to protect their native forests and regulate the expansion of large-scale agriculture. A recent study postulates that observed reductions in deforestatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volante, Jose Norberto, Seghezzo, Lucas
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2878
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917307668?via%3Dihub
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.007
_version_ 1855483137406009344
author Volante, Jose Norberto
Seghezzo, Lucas
author_browse Seghezzo, Lucas
Volante, Jose Norberto
author_facet Volante, Jose Norberto
Seghezzo, Lucas
author_sort Volante, Jose Norberto
collection INTA Digital
description A national “Forest Law” passed in Argentina in 2007 mandated provincial governments to set up and implement land use planning processes in order to protect their native forests and regulate the expansion of large-scale agriculture. A recent study postulates that observed reductions in deforestation in three provinces of the Argentinian “Dry Chaco” ecoregion (namely Salta, Santiago del Estero, and Chaco) can be attributed to the effective enforcement of this law by provincial governments. Yet a more contextualized analysis of the local situation raises a number of objections to the methods used and the conclusions drawn in that study. Our analysis (and first-hand experience) shows that provincial governments were unable to enforce the Forest Law, since deforestation in protected areas continued or even increased after its approval and implementation. Our criticism can be categorized into five major challenges: (1) declining deforestation trends started before the Forest Law; (2) a province with a substantial increase in deforestation was omitted; (3) only part of one ecoregion was taken into account in the analysis; (4) deforestation percentage by conservation categories is better than hectares by province as an indicator of law enforcement; and (5) assigning zones to land units prior to land use planning processes is questionable. These challenges, and the lack of a more complete and nuanced political analysis of the situation on the ground, calls into question both the reliability of the results and the usefulness of the conclusions in the study. Ambiguous or misleading messages from the academic community can have negative political consequences and hinder local conservation efforts in the short term. We should not be so caught up in our desire to see improvements on the ground that we can't see the forest for the trees.
format Artículo
id INTA2878
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling INTA28782018-07-25T18:13:53Z Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement? Volante, Jose Norberto Seghezzo, Lucas Deforestación Legislación Forestal Gobierno Local Política Forestal Forestry Policies Local Government Forest Law Deforestation Región Chaqueña Argentina A national “Forest Law” passed in Argentina in 2007 mandated provincial governments to set up and implement land use planning processes in order to protect their native forests and regulate the expansion of large-scale agriculture. A recent study postulates that observed reductions in deforestation in three provinces of the Argentinian “Dry Chaco” ecoregion (namely Salta, Santiago del Estero, and Chaco) can be attributed to the effective enforcement of this law by provincial governments. Yet a more contextualized analysis of the local situation raises a number of objections to the methods used and the conclusions drawn in that study. Our analysis (and first-hand experience) shows that provincial governments were unable to enforce the Forest Law, since deforestation in protected areas continued or even increased after its approval and implementation. Our criticism can be categorized into five major challenges: (1) declining deforestation trends started before the Forest Law; (2) a province with a substantial increase in deforestation was omitted; (3) only part of one ecoregion was taken into account in the analysis; (4) deforestation percentage by conservation categories is better than hectares by province as an indicator of law enforcement; and (5) assigning zones to land units prior to land use planning processes is questionable. These challenges, and the lack of a more complete and nuanced political analysis of the situation on the ground, calls into question both the reliability of the results and the usefulness of the conclusions in the study. Ambiguous or misleading messages from the academic community can have negative political consequences and hinder local conservation efforts in the short term. We should not be so caught up in our desire to see improvements on the ground that we can't see the forest for the trees. EEA Salta Fil: Volante, Jose Norberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina Fil: Seghezzo, Lucas. Consejo Nacional de Invest.cientif.y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnol.conicet - Salta. Instituto de Invest.en Energia No Convencional; Argentina 2018-07-25T17:38:04Z 2018-07-25T17:38:04Z 2018 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2878 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917307668?via%3Dihub 0921-8009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.007 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Elsevier Ecological economics 146 : 408–413. (2018)
spellingShingle Deforestación
Legislación Forestal
Gobierno Local
Política Forestal
Forestry Policies
Local Government
Forest Law
Deforestation
Región Chaqueña
Argentina
Volante, Jose Norberto
Seghezzo, Lucas
Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?
title Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?
title_full Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?
title_fullStr Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?
title_full_unstemmed Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?
title_short Can't see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement?
title_sort can t see the forest for the trees can declining deforestation trends in the argentinian chaco region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement
topic Deforestación
Legislación Forestal
Gobierno Local
Política Forestal
Forestry Policies
Local Government
Forest Law
Deforestation
Región Chaqueña
Argentina
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2878
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917307668?via%3Dihub
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.007
work_keys_str_mv AT volantejosenorberto cantseetheforestforthetreescandecliningdeforestationtrendsintheargentinianchacoregionbeascribedtoefficientlawenforcement
AT seghezzolucas cantseetheforestforthetreescandecliningdeforestationtrendsintheargentinianchacoregionbeascribedtoefficientlawenforcement