Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves

Foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune ada...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Di Giacomo, Sebastián, Brito, Barbara Patricia, Perez, A.M., Bucafusco, Danilo, Pega, Juan Franco, Rodríguez, L., Borca, Manuel Victor, Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
Format: Artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbed.12130
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2510
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12130
_version_ 1855483069060874240
author Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Brito, Barbara Patricia
Perez, A.M.
Bucafusco, Danilo
Pega, Juan Franco
Rodríguez, L.
Borca, Manuel Victor
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
author_browse Borca, Manuel Victor
Brito, Barbara Patricia
Bucafusco, Danilo
Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Pega, Juan Franco
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
Perez, A.M.
Rodríguez, L.
author_facet Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Brito, Barbara Patricia
Perez, A.M.
Bucafusco, Danilo
Pega, Juan Franco
Rodríguez, L.
Borca, Manuel Victor
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
author_sort Di Giacomo, Sebastián
collection INTA Digital
description Foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune adaptive responses has been demonstrated only for peptide antigens derived from FMDV structural proteins. Here, we quantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo‐vaccinated against FMD and study its association with the genetic background in Holstein and Jersey sires. A total of 377 FMDV‐seronegative calves (122 and 255 calves from 16 and 15 Holstein and Jersey sires, respectively) were included in the study. Samples were taken the day prior to primo‐vaccination and 45 days post‐vaccination (dpv). Animals received commercial tetravalent FMD single emulsion oil vaccines formulated with inactivated FMDV. Total FMDV‐specific antibody responses were studied against three viral strains included in the vaccine, and antibody titres were determined by liquid‐phase blocking ELISA. Three linear hierarchical mixed regression models, one for each strain, were formulated to assess the heterogeneity in the immune responses to vaccination. The dependent variables were the antibody titres induced against each FMDV strain at 45 dpv, whereas sire's ‘breed’ was included as a fixed effect, ‘sire’ was included as a random effect, and ‘farm’ was considered as a hierarchical factor to account for lack of independence of within herd measurements. A significant association was found between anti‐FMDV antibody responses and sire's breed, with lower immune responses found in the Jersey sires’ offspring compared with those from Holstein sires. No significant intrabreed variation was detected. In addition, farm management practices were similar in this study, and results of the serological assays were shown to be repeatable. It therefore seems plausible that differences in the immune response may be expected in the event of a mass vaccination campaigns.
format Artículo
id INTA2510
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
record_format dspace
spelling INTA25102019-06-05T18:22:43Z Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves Di Giacomo, Sebastián Brito, Barbara Patricia Perez, A.M. Bucafusco, Danilo Pega, Juan Franco Rodríguez, L. Borca, Manuel Victor Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano Ternero Enfermedades de los Animales Fiebre Aftosa Vacunación Anticuerpos Calves Animal Diseases Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccination Antibodies Foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are routinely used as effective control tools in large regions worldwide and to limit outbreaks during epidemics. Vaccine‐induced protection in cattle has been largely correlated with the FMD virus (FMDV)‐specific antibodies. Genetic control of cattle immune adaptive responses has been demonstrated only for peptide antigens derived from FMDV structural proteins. Here, we quantify the heterogeneity in the antibody response of cattle primo‐vaccinated against FMD and study its association with the genetic background in Holstein and Jersey sires. A total of 377 FMDV‐seronegative calves (122 and 255 calves from 16 and 15 Holstein and Jersey sires, respectively) were included in the study. Samples were taken the day prior to primo‐vaccination and 45 days post‐vaccination (dpv). Animals received commercial tetravalent FMD single emulsion oil vaccines formulated with inactivated FMDV. Total FMDV‐specific antibody responses were studied against three viral strains included in the vaccine, and antibody titres were determined by liquid‐phase blocking ELISA. Three linear hierarchical mixed regression models, one for each strain, were formulated to assess the heterogeneity in the immune responses to vaccination. The dependent variables were the antibody titres induced against each FMDV strain at 45 dpv, whereas sire's ‘breed’ was included as a fixed effect, ‘sire’ was included as a random effect, and ‘farm’ was considered as a hierarchical factor to account for lack of independence of within herd measurements. A significant association was found between anti‐FMDV antibody responses and sire's breed, with lower immune responses found in the Jersey sires’ offspring compared with those from Holstein sires. No significant intrabreed variation was detected. In addition, farm management practices were similar in this study, and results of the serological assays were shown to be repeatable. It therefore seems plausible that differences in the immune response may be expected in the event of a mass vaccination campaigns. Instituto de Virología Fil: Di Giacomo, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina Fil: Brito, Barbara Patricia. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos Fil: Perez, A.M. University of California Davis. School of Veterinary Medicine. Center for Animal Diseases Modeling and Surveillance. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Bucafusco, Danilo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Pega, Juan Franco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Rodríguez, L. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Borca, Manuel Victor. USDA. Agricultural Research Service. Plum Island Animal Disease Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Virología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  2018-05-29T15:52:23Z 2018-05-29T15:52:23Z 2015-06 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbed.12130 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2510 1865-1674 1865-1682 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12130 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Transboundary and emerging diseases 62 (3) : 280-287. (June 2015)
spellingShingle Ternero
Enfermedades de los Animales
Fiebre Aftosa
Vacunación
Anticuerpos
Calves
Animal Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccination
Antibodies
Di Giacomo, Sebastián
Brito, Barbara Patricia
Perez, A.M.
Bucafusco, Danilo
Pega, Juan Franco
Rodríguez, L.
Borca, Manuel Victor
Perez Filgueira, Daniel Mariano
Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_full Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_short Heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot‐and‐mouth disease primo‐vaccinated calves
title_sort heterogeneity in the antibody response to foot and mouth disease primo vaccinated calves
topic Ternero
Enfermedades de los Animales
Fiebre Aftosa
Vacunación
Anticuerpos
Calves
Animal Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease
Vaccination
Antibodies
url https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tbed.12130
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2510
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12130
work_keys_str_mv AT digiacomosebastian heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT britobarbarapatricia heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT perezam heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT bucafuscodanilo heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT pegajuanfranco heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT rodriguezl heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT borcamanuelvictor heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves
AT perezfilgueiradanielmariano heterogeneityintheantibodyresponsetofootandmouthdiseaseprimovaccinatedcalves