Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region
Biodiversity is crucial in agroecosystems, as it makes them more efficient, stronger, productive and resilient. The aim was to determine and compare the existing biodiversity in two different production systems: agroecological and industrial during 2018 and 2019 in the INTA Barrow (Buenos Aires, Arg...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Murcia; Sociedad Española de Agricultura Ecológica
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23286 https://revista.agroecologia.net/index.php/revista-agroecologia/article/view/77 https://doi.org/10.59187/revistaagroecologia.v15i1.77 |
| _version_ | 1855487100529410048 |
|---|---|
| author | Taraborelli, Paula Andrea Carrasco, Natalia Malaspina, Micaela Domínguez, Cecilia Scavone, Andrea Soledad Zamora, Martin Sergio |
| author_browse | Carrasco, Natalia Domínguez, Cecilia Malaspina, Micaela Scavone, Andrea Soledad Taraborelli, Paula Andrea Zamora, Martin Sergio |
| author_facet | Taraborelli, Paula Andrea Carrasco, Natalia Malaspina, Micaela Domínguez, Cecilia Scavone, Andrea Soledad Zamora, Martin Sergio |
| author_sort | Taraborelli, Paula Andrea |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Biodiversity is crucial in agroecosystems, as it makes them more efficient, stronger, productive and resilient. The aim was to determine and compare the existing biodiversity in two different production systems: agroecological and industrial during 2018 and 2019 in the INTA Barrow (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Sampling of mammals, birds, arthropods and spontaneous vegetation were made in wheat and oat crops. Several parameters were estimated including abundance, density, richness, dominance, diversity and equitivity for each study group. The agroecological system presented higher density of birds and mammals, richness of arthropods and spontaneous species compared to the industrial system. The greater agricultural diversification in the agroecological system evidenced a more complex landscape structure, through the increase in the richness of spontaneous species and beneficial fauna that would increase the potential for biotic regulation of the system. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA23286 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Universidad de Murcia; Sociedad Española de Agricultura Ecológica |
| publisherStr | Universidad de Murcia; Sociedad Española de Agricultura Ecológica |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA232862025-08-04T10:59:12Z Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region Taraborelli, Paula Andrea Carrasco, Natalia Malaspina, Micaela Domínguez, Cecilia Scavone, Andrea Soledad Zamora, Martin Sergio Sustainability Agrobiodiversity Sostenibilidad Agrobiodiversidad Agroecological Productive System Trophic Network Producción Agroecológica Interacciones Ecológicas Sustentabilidad Región Pampeana, Argentina Biodiversity is crucial in agroecosystems, as it makes them more efficient, stronger, productive and resilient. The aim was to determine and compare the existing biodiversity in two different production systems: agroecological and industrial during 2018 and 2019 in the INTA Barrow (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Sampling of mammals, birds, arthropods and spontaneous vegetation were made in wheat and oat crops. Several parameters were estimated including abundance, density, richness, dominance, diversity and equitivity for each study group. The agroecological system presented higher density of birds and mammals, richness of arthropods and spontaneous species compared to the industrial system. The greater agricultural diversification in the agroecological system evidenced a more complex landscape structure, through the increase in the richness of spontaneous species and beneficial fauna that would increase the potential for biotic regulation of the system. La biodiversidad es crucial en los agroecosistemas, puesto que los hace más eficientes, fuertes, productivos y resilientes. El objetivo fue determinar y comparar la biodiversidad presente en dos sistemas productivos, uno agroecológico y otro industrial en el INTA Barrow (Buenos Aires, Argentina), en los años 2018 y 2019. Se realizaron muestreos de: mamíferos, aves, artrópodos y vegetación espontánea. Se determinaron varios indicadores, abundancia, densidad, riqueza, dominancia, diversidad y equitatividad para cada grupo de estudio. El sistema agroecológico presentó mayor densidad de aves y mamíferos, riqueza de artrópodos y de vegetación espontánea respecto del sistema industrial. La mayor diversificación agrícola en la producción agroecológica evidenció una estructuración más compleja del paisaje, a través del aumento de la riqueza de vegetación espontánea y fauna benéfica que incrementarían el potencial de regulación biótica del sistema. A biodiversidade é crucial nos agroecossistemas, pois os torna mais eficientes, fortes, produtivos e resilientes. O objetivo foi determinar e comparar a biodiversidade presente em dois sistemas produtivos, um agroecológico e outro industrial no INTA Barrow (Buenos Aires, Argentina), nos anos de 2018 e 2019. A amostragem foi realizada de: mamíferos, aves, artrópodes e vegetação espontânea. Vários indicadores, abundância, densidade, riqueza, dominância, diversidade e uniformidade foram determinados para cada grupo de estudo. O sistema agroecológico apresentou maior densidade de aves e mamíferos, riqueza de artrópodes e vegetação espontânea em relação ao sistema industrial. A maior diversificação agrícola na produção agroecológica evidenciou uma estruturação mais complexa da paisagem, por meio do aumento da riqueza da vegetação espontânea e fauna benéfica que aumentariam o potencial de regulação biótica do sistema. Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales Fil: Taraborelli, Paula Andrea. Paula Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA); Argentina Fil: Taraborelli, Paula Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina Fil: Carrasco, Natalia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentina Fil: Malaspina, Micaela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentina Fil: Domínguez, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina Fil: Scavone, Andrea Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentina Fil: Zamora, Martin Sergio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Barrow; Argentina 2025-08-04T10:46:05Z 2025-08-04T10:46:05Z 2024-05-24 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23286 https://revista.agroecologia.net/index.php/revista-agroecologia/article/view/77 1989-4686 https://doi.org/10.59187/revistaagroecologia.v15i1.77 eng info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I038-002, Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo de la biodiversidad en sistemas agropecuarios y forestales info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/BASUR/1272409/AR./Proyecto regional con enfoque territorial de la CEI Barrow. info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Universidad de Murcia; Sociedad Española de Agricultura Ecológica Revista Agroecología 15 (1) : 73-82 (2022) |
| spellingShingle | Sustainability Agrobiodiversity Sostenibilidad Agrobiodiversidad Agroecological Productive System Trophic Network Producción Agroecológica Interacciones Ecológicas Sustentabilidad Región Pampeana, Argentina Taraborelli, Paula Andrea Carrasco, Natalia Malaspina, Micaela Domínguez, Cecilia Scavone, Andrea Soledad Zamora, Martin Sergio Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region |
| title | Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region |
| title_full | Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region |
| title_fullStr | Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region |
| title_full_unstemmed | Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region |
| title_short | Agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of Argentine Pampeana Region |
| title_sort | agrobiodiversity and associated trophic interactions as an indicator of sustainability in 73 productive systems of argentine pampeana region |
| topic | Sustainability Agrobiodiversity Sostenibilidad Agrobiodiversidad Agroecological Productive System Trophic Network Producción Agroecológica Interacciones Ecológicas Sustentabilidad Región Pampeana, Argentina |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/23286 https://revista.agroecologia.net/index.php/revista-agroecologia/article/view/77 https://doi.org/10.59187/revistaagroecologia.v15i1.77 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taraborellipaulaandrea agrobiodiversityandassociatedtrophicinteractionsasanindicatorofsustainabilityin73productivesystemsofargentinepampeanaregion AT carrasconatalia agrobiodiversityandassociatedtrophicinteractionsasanindicatorofsustainabilityin73productivesystemsofargentinepampeanaregion AT malaspinamicaela agrobiodiversityandassociatedtrophicinteractionsasanindicatorofsustainabilityin73productivesystemsofargentinepampeanaregion AT dominguezcecilia agrobiodiversityandassociatedtrophicinteractionsasanindicatorofsustainabilityin73productivesystemsofargentinepampeanaregion AT scavoneandreasoledad agrobiodiversityandassociatedtrophicinteractionsasanindicatorofsustainabilityin73productivesystemsofargentinepampeanaregion AT zamoramartinsergio agrobiodiversityandassociatedtrophicinteractionsasanindicatorofsustainabilityin73productivesystemsofargentinepampeanaregion |