Genetics of Growth and Stem Straightness Traits in Pinus taeda in Argentina: Exploring Genetic Competition Across Ages and Sites
Traditional quantitative genetic models in forestry often overlook the influence of an individual’s genes on neighboring trees. However, genetic competition models help bridge this gap. Competition varies among populations, over time, and across environments, yet forest breeders rarely monitor these...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
MDPI
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/22511 https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/16/4/675 https://doi.org/10.3390/f16040675 |
| Summary: | Traditional quantitative genetic models in forestry often overlook the influence of an individual’s genes on neighboring trees. However, genetic competition models help bridge this gap. Competition varies among populations, over time, and across environments, yet forest breeders rarely monitor these dynamics or their effects on selected genotypes. We investigated the effects of competition on genetic variances, breeding value accuracy, and selection response in 14 Pinus taeda L. progeny tests using spatial (Spa) and spatial-competition (Spa-Comp) individual-tree mixed models. Our analysis covered traits such as diameter at breast height (DBH), total height (TH), and stem straightness (STR) across ages (3–21 years) and sites (altitude, soil texture, drainage). DBH was more affected by genetic competition than TH and STR, with effects varying across ages and sites. Directcompetition genetic correlations were negative for DBH from age 5 onward but positive for
TH, reducing total heritable variance for DBH (<43.1%) while increasing for TH (<95.7%). Genetic competition accounted for less than 26% of direct additive variance. For DBH, the Spa-Comp model slightly improved breeding value accuracy (<~4%), while Spa inflated selection esponse (<3.83 percentage points), yet rank changes were minimal (common selected trees > 89%). These findings indicate that while ompetition inflates genetic gains, its impact on selection efficiency is minimal. |
|---|