Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations

Despite its relevance, measuring the contributions of the bioeconomy to national economies remains an arduous task that faces limitations. Part of the difficulty is associated with the lack of a clear and widely accepted concept of the bioeconomy and moves on to the connections between methods, data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leavy, Sebastian, Allegretti, Gabriela, Presotto, Elen, Montoya, Marco Antonio, Talamini, Edson
Format: Artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: MDPI 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21615
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8727
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208727
_version_ 1855486784222265344
author Leavy, Sebastian
Allegretti, Gabriela
Presotto, Elen
Montoya, Marco Antonio
Talamini, Edson
author_browse Allegretti, Gabriela
Leavy, Sebastian
Montoya, Marco Antonio
Presotto, Elen
Talamini, Edson
author_facet Leavy, Sebastian
Allegretti, Gabriela
Presotto, Elen
Montoya, Marco Antonio
Talamini, Edson
author_sort Leavy, Sebastian
collection INTA Digital
description Despite its relevance, measuring the contributions of the bioeconomy to national economies remains an arduous task that faces limitations. Part of the difficulty is associated with the lack of a clear and widely accepted concept of the bioeconomy and moves on to the connections between methods, data and indicators. The present study aims to define the concepts of bioeconomy and to explore the connections between concepts, methods, data, and indicators when measuring the bioeconomy economically and the limitations involved in this process. The bioeconomy concepts were defined based on a literature review and a content analysis of 84 documents selected through snowballing procedures to find articles measuring “how big is the bioeconomy?” The content of the 84 documents was uploaded to the Quantitative Data Analysis (QDA Miner) software and coded according to the bioeconomy concept, the methods or models used, the data sources accessed, the indicators calculated, and the limitations reported by the authors. The results of the occurrence and co-occurrence of the codes were extracted and analyzed statistically, indicating the following: the measurement of the bioeconomy (i) needs to recognize and pursue the proposed concept of a holistic bioeconomy; (ii) rarely considered aspects of a holistic bioeconomy (3.5%); (iii) is primarily based on the concept of biomass-based bioeconomy (BmBB) (94%); (iv) the association with the concept of biosphere (BsBB) appeared in 26% of the studies; (v) the biotech-based bioeconomy (BtBB) was the least frequent (1.2%); (vi) there is a diversity of methods and models, but the most common are those traditionally used to measure macroeconomic activities, especially input-output models; (vii) depending on the prevailing methods, the data comes from various official statistical databases, such as national accounts and economic activity classification systems; (viii) the most frequently used indicators are value added, employment, and Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions; (ix) there are various limitations related to the concept, methods and models, data, indicators, and others, like incomplete, missing, or lack of data, aggregated data, outdated data or databases, uncertainty of the estimated values, the subjectivity in the bio-shares weighting procedures, and other limitations inherent to methods and models. We conclude that current efforts only partially measure the contributions of the bioeconomy, and efforts should be encouraged toward a full assessment, starting by recognizing that the measurement of a holistic bioeconomy should be pursued.
format Artículo
id INTA21615
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher MDPI
publisherStr MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling INTA216152025-03-11T11:28:10Z Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations Leavy, Sebastian Allegretti, Gabriela Presotto, Elen Montoya, Marco Antonio Talamini, Edson Bioeconomía Sistema Económico Biotecnología Bioeconomy Economic Systems Biotechnology Holistic Bioeconomy Bio-based Economy Bioecology Digitalization Despite its relevance, measuring the contributions of the bioeconomy to national economies remains an arduous task that faces limitations. Part of the difficulty is associated with the lack of a clear and widely accepted concept of the bioeconomy and moves on to the connections between methods, data and indicators. The present study aims to define the concepts of bioeconomy and to explore the connections between concepts, methods, data, and indicators when measuring the bioeconomy economically and the limitations involved in this process. The bioeconomy concepts were defined based on a literature review and a content analysis of 84 documents selected through snowballing procedures to find articles measuring “how big is the bioeconomy?” The content of the 84 documents was uploaded to the Quantitative Data Analysis (QDA Miner) software and coded according to the bioeconomy concept, the methods or models used, the data sources accessed, the indicators calculated, and the limitations reported by the authors. The results of the occurrence and co-occurrence of the codes were extracted and analyzed statistically, indicating the following: the measurement of the bioeconomy (i) needs to recognize and pursue the proposed concept of a holistic bioeconomy; (ii) rarely considered aspects of a holistic bioeconomy (3.5%); (iii) is primarily based on the concept of biomass-based bioeconomy (BmBB) (94%); (iv) the association with the concept of biosphere (BsBB) appeared in 26% of the studies; (v) the biotech-based bioeconomy (BtBB) was the least frequent (1.2%); (vi) there is a diversity of methods and models, but the most common are those traditionally used to measure macroeconomic activities, especially input-output models; (vii) depending on the prevailing methods, the data comes from various official statistical databases, such as national accounts and economic activity classification systems; (viii) the most frequently used indicators are value added, employment, and Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions; (ix) there are various limitations related to the concept, methods and models, data, indicators, and others, like incomplete, missing, or lack of data, aggregated data, outdated data or databases, uncertainty of the estimated values, the subjectivity in the bio-shares weighting procedures, and other limitations inherent to methods and models. We conclude that current efforts only partially measure the contributions of the bioeconomy, and efforts should be encouraged toward a full assessment, starting by recognizing that the measurement of a holistic bioeconomy should be pursued. EEA Pergamino Fil: Leavy, Sebastián. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Agencia de Extensión Rural Vedia; Argentina Fil: Leavy, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Cátedra de Comercialización Agropecuaria; Argentina Fil: Leavy, Sebastián. Universidad de Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Estudios e pesquisas en Agronegocios. Grupo de investigación en Bioeconomía; Brasil Fil: Allegretti, Gabriela. Universidad de Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Estudios e pesquisas en Agronegocios. Grupo de investigación en Bioeconomía; Brasil Fil: Allegretti, Gabriela. Instituto Brasileño de Bioeconomía; Brasil Fil: Allegretti, Gabriela. Universidad de Rio Verde. Administración de Empresas; Brasil Fil: Presotto, Elen. Universidad de Brasilia. Facultad de Agronomía y Medicina Veterinaria; Brasil Fil: Montoya, Marco Antonio. Universidad de Passo Fundo. Facultad de Economía, Gestión y Contabilidad. Grupo de Investigación en Economía y Gestión de Agronegocios; Brasil Fil: Talamini, Edson. Universidad de Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Estudios e pesquisas en Agronegocios. Grupo de investigación en Bioeconomía; Brasil Fil: Talamini, Edson. Instituto Brasileño de Bioeconomía; Brasil Fil: Talamini, Edson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Facultad de Economía. Departamento de Economía y Relaciones Internacionales; Brasil 2025-03-11T11:11:14Z 2025-03-11T11:11:14Z 2024-10 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21615 https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8727 2071-1050 https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208727 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf MDPI Sustainability 16 (20) : 8727. (October 2024)
spellingShingle Bioeconomía
Sistema Económico
Biotecnología
Bioeconomy
Economic Systems
Biotechnology
Holistic Bioeconomy
Bio-based Economy
Bioecology
Digitalization
Leavy, Sebastian
Allegretti, Gabriela
Presotto, Elen
Montoya, Marco Antonio
Talamini, Edson
Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations
title Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations
title_full Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations
title_fullStr Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations
title_short Measuring the bioeconomy economically : exploring the connections between concepts, methods, data, indicators and their limitations
title_sort measuring the bioeconomy economically exploring the connections between concepts methods data indicators and their limitations
topic Bioeconomía
Sistema Económico
Biotecnología
Bioeconomy
Economic Systems
Biotechnology
Holistic Bioeconomy
Bio-based Economy
Bioecology
Digitalization
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21615
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8727
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208727
work_keys_str_mv AT leavysebastian measuringthebioeconomyeconomicallyexploringtheconnectionsbetweenconceptsmethodsdataindicatorsandtheirlimitations
AT allegrettigabriela measuringthebioeconomyeconomicallyexploringtheconnectionsbetweenconceptsmethodsdataindicatorsandtheirlimitations
AT presottoelen measuringthebioeconomyeconomicallyexploringtheconnectionsbetweenconceptsmethodsdataindicatorsandtheirlimitations
AT montoyamarcoantonio measuringthebioeconomyeconomicallyexploringtheconnectionsbetweenconceptsmethodsdataindicatorsandtheirlimitations
AT talaminiedson measuringthebioeconomyeconomicallyexploringtheconnectionsbetweenconceptsmethodsdataindicatorsandtheirlimitations