Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project
Nine Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) were developed within the OpenNESS project specifically for modelling ecosystem services for case study applications. The novelty of the method, its ability to explore problems, to address uncertainty, and to facilitate stakeholder interaction in the process were...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1924 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617306587#! https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.004 |
| _version_ | 1855482964849197056 |
|---|---|
| author | Smith, Ron I. Barton, David N. Dick, Jan Haines-Young, Roy Madsen, Anders L. Rusch, Graciela M. Termansen, Mette Woods, Helen Carvalho, Lawrence Giuca, Relu Constantin Luque, Sandra Odee, David Rusch, Veronica Elena Saarikoski, Heli Adamescu, Cristian Dunford, Rob Ochieng, John Gonzalez-Redin, Julen Stange, Erik Vadineanu, Angheluta Verweij, Peter Vikström, Suvi |
| author_browse | Adamescu, Cristian Barton, David N. Carvalho, Lawrence Dick, Jan Dunford, Rob Giuca, Relu Constantin Gonzalez-Redin, Julen Haines-Young, Roy Luque, Sandra Madsen, Anders L. Ochieng, John Odee, David Rusch, Graciela M. Rusch, Veronica Elena Saarikoski, Heli Smith, Ron I. Stange, Erik Termansen, Mette Vadineanu, Angheluta Verweij, Peter Vikström, Suvi Woods, Helen |
| author_facet | Smith, Ron I. Barton, David N. Dick, Jan Haines-Young, Roy Madsen, Anders L. Rusch, Graciela M. Termansen, Mette Woods, Helen Carvalho, Lawrence Giuca, Relu Constantin Luque, Sandra Odee, David Rusch, Veronica Elena Saarikoski, Heli Adamescu, Cristian Dunford, Rob Ochieng, John Gonzalez-Redin, Julen Stange, Erik Vadineanu, Angheluta Verweij, Peter Vikström, Suvi |
| author_sort | Smith, Ron I. |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Nine Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) were developed within the OpenNESS project specifically for modelling ecosystem services for case study applications. The novelty of the method, its ability to explore problems, to address uncertainty, and to facilitate stakeholder interaction in the process were all reasons for choosing BBNs. Most case studies had some local expertise on BBNs to assist them, and all used expert opinion as well as data to help develop the dependences in the BBNs. In terms of the decision scope of the
work, all case studies were moving from explorative and informative uses towards decisive, but none
were yet being used for decision-making. Three applications incorporated BBNs with GIS where the spatial component of the management was critical, but several concerns about estimating uncertainty with spatial modelling approaches are discussed. The tool proved to be very flexible and, particularly with its web interface, was an asset when working with stakeholders to facilitate exploration of outcomes, knowledge elicitation and social learning. BBNs were rated as very useful and widely applicable by the case studies that used them, but further improvements in software and more training were also deemed necessary. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA1924 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateRange | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA19242019-03-21T18:31:58Z Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project Smith, Ron I. Barton, David N. Dick, Jan Haines-Young, Roy Madsen, Anders L. Rusch, Graciela M. Termansen, Mette Woods, Helen Carvalho, Lawrence Giuca, Relu Constantin Luque, Sandra Odee, David Rusch, Veronica Elena Saarikoski, Heli Adamescu, Cristian Dunford, Rob Ochieng, John Gonzalez-Redin, Julen Stange, Erik Vadineanu, Angheluta Verweij, Peter Vikström, Suvi Agroecosistemas Agentes Interesados Agroecosystems Stakeholders Servicios Ecosistémicos Nine Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) were developed within the OpenNESS project specifically for modelling ecosystem services for case study applications. The novelty of the method, its ability to explore problems, to address uncertainty, and to facilitate stakeholder interaction in the process were all reasons for choosing BBNs. Most case studies had some local expertise on BBNs to assist them, and all used expert opinion as well as data to help develop the dependences in the BBNs. In terms of the decision scope of the work, all case studies were moving from explorative and informative uses towards decisive, but none were yet being used for decision-making. Three applications incorporated BBNs with GIS where the spatial component of the management was critical, but several concerns about estimating uncertainty with spatial modelling approaches are discussed. The tool proved to be very flexible and, particularly with its web interface, was an asset when working with stakeholders to facilitate exploration of outcomes, knowledge elicitation and social learning. BBNs were rated as very useful and widely applicable by the case studies that used them, but further improvements in software and more training were also deemed necessary. EEA Bariloche Fil: Smith, Ron I. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña Fil: Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Dick, Jan. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña Fil: Haines-Young, Roy. Fabis Consulting Ltd,; Gran Bretaña Fil: Madsen, Anders L. Hugin Expert A/S; Dinamarca. Aalborg University. Department of Computer Science; Dinamarca Fil: Rusch, Graciela M. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Termansen, Mette. Aarhus University. Department Environmental Science; Dinamarca Fil: Woods, Helen. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña Fil: Carvalho, Lawrence. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña Fil: Giuca, Relu Constantin. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania Fil: Luque, Sandra. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia Fil: Odee, David. Kenya Forestry Research Institute; Kenia Fil: Rusch, Veronica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Saarikoski, Heli. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia Fil: Adamescu, Cristian. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania Fil: Dunford, Rob. Environmental Change Institute. Gran Bretaña. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Maclean Building; Gran Bretaña Fil: Ochieng, John. Kenya Forestry Research Institute; Kenia Fil: Gonzalez-Redin, Julen. James Hutton Institute; Gran Bretaña Fil: Stange, Erik. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania Fil: Verweij, Peter. Wageningen University & Research – Environmental Research; Holanda Fil: Vikström, Suvi. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia 2018-03-01T14:17:26Z 2018-03-01T14:17:26Z 2018 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1924 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617306587#! https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.004 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Ecosystem services 29, Part C, : 452-464. (February 2018) |
| spellingShingle | Agroecosistemas Agentes Interesados Agroecosystems Stakeholders Servicios Ecosistémicos Smith, Ron I. Barton, David N. Dick, Jan Haines-Young, Roy Madsen, Anders L. Rusch, Graciela M. Termansen, Mette Woods, Helen Carvalho, Lawrence Giuca, Relu Constantin Luque, Sandra Odee, David Rusch, Veronica Elena Saarikoski, Heli Adamescu, Cristian Dunford, Rob Ochieng, John Gonzalez-Redin, Julen Stange, Erik Vadineanu, Angheluta Verweij, Peter Vikström, Suvi Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project |
| title | Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project |
| title_full | Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project |
| title_fullStr | Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project |
| title_full_unstemmed | Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project |
| title_short | Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Netwoks: Experiences within the OpenNESS project |
| title_sort | operationalising ecosystem service assessment in bayesian belief netwoks experiences within the openness project |
| topic | Agroecosistemas Agentes Interesados Agroecosystems Stakeholders Servicios Ecosistémicos |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1924 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617306587#! https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.004 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT smithroni operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT bartondavidn operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT dickjan operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT hainesyoungroy operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT madsenandersl operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT ruschgracielam operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT termansenmette operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT woodshelen operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT carvalholawrence operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT giucareluconstantin operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT luquesandra operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT odeedavid operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT ruschveronicaelena operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT saarikoskiheli operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT adamescucristian operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT dunfordrob operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT ochiengjohn operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT gonzalezredinjulen operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT stangeerik operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT vadineanuangheluta operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT verweijpeter operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject AT vikstromsuvi operationalisingecosystemserviceassessmentinbayesianbeliefnetwoksexperienceswithintheopennessproject |