When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning
Spatial planning has to deal with trade-offs between various stakeholders’ wishes and needs as part of planning and management of landscapes, natural resources and/or biodiversity. To make ecosystem services (ES) trade-off research more relevant for spatial planning, we propose an analytical framewo...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1836 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011 |
| _version_ | 1855034861031522304 |
|---|---|
| author | Turkelboom, Francis Leone, Michael Jacobs, Sander Kelemen, Eszter García-Llorente, Marina Baró, Francesc Termansen, Mette Barton, David N. Berry, Pam Stange, Erik Thoonen, Marijke Kalóczkai, Ágnes Vadineanu, Angheluta Castro, Antonio J. Czúcz, Bálint Röckmann, Christine Wurbs, Daniel Odee, David Preda, Elena Gómez-Baggethun, Erik Rusch, Graciela M. Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José Palomo, Ignacio Dick, Jan Casaer, Jim van Dijk, Jiska Priess, Joerg A. Langemeyer, Johannes Mustajoki, Jyri Kopperoinen, Leena Baptist, Martin J. Peri, Pablo Luis Rusch, Veronica Elena Mukhopadhyay, Raktima Aszalós, Réka Roy, S.B. Luque, Sandra |
| author_browse | Aszalós, Réka Baptist, Martin J. Barton, David N. Baró, Francesc Berry, Pam Casaer, Jim Castro, Antonio J. Czúcz, Bálint Dick, Jan García-Llorente, Marina Gómez-Baggethun, Erik Jacobs, Sander Kalóczkai, Ágnes Kelemen, Eszter Kopperoinen, Leena Langemeyer, Johannes Leone, Michael Luque, Sandra Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José Mukhopadhyay, Raktima Mustajoki, Jyri Odee, David Palomo, Ignacio Peri, Pablo Luis Preda, Elena Priess, Joerg A. Roy, S.B. Rusch, Graciela M. Rusch, Veronica Elena Röckmann, Christine Stange, Erik Termansen, Mette Thoonen, Marijke Turkelboom, Francis Vadineanu, Angheluta Wurbs, Daniel van Dijk, Jiska |
| author_facet | Turkelboom, Francis Leone, Michael Jacobs, Sander Kelemen, Eszter García-Llorente, Marina Baró, Francesc Termansen, Mette Barton, David N. Berry, Pam Stange, Erik Thoonen, Marijke Kalóczkai, Ágnes Vadineanu, Angheluta Castro, Antonio J. Czúcz, Bálint Röckmann, Christine Wurbs, Daniel Odee, David Preda, Elena Gómez-Baggethun, Erik Rusch, Graciela M. Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José Palomo, Ignacio Dick, Jan Casaer, Jim van Dijk, Jiska Priess, Joerg A. Langemeyer, Johannes Mustajoki, Jyri Kopperoinen, Leena Baptist, Martin J. Peri, Pablo Luis Rusch, Veronica Elena Mukhopadhyay, Raktima Aszalós, Réka Roy, S.B. Luque, Sandra |
| author_sort | Turkelboom, Francis |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Spatial planning has to deal with trade-offs between various stakeholders’ wishes and needs as part of planning and management of landscapes, natural resources and/or biodiversity. To make ecosystem services (ES) trade-off research more relevant for spatial planning, we propose an analytical framework, which puts stakeholders, their land-use/management choices, their impact on ES and responses at the centre. Based on 24 cases from around the world, we used this framing to analyse the appearance and diversity of real-world ES trade-offs. They cover a wide range of trade-offs related to ecosystem use, including: land-use change, management regimes, technical versus nature-based solutions, natural resource use, and management of species. The ES trade-offs studied featured a complexity that was far greater than what is often described in the ES literature. Influential users and context setters are at the core of the trade-off decision-making, but most of the impact is felt by non-influential users. Provisioning and cultural ES were the most targeted in the studied trade-offs, but regulating ES were the most impacted. Stakeholders’ characteristics, such as influence, impact faced, and concerns can partially explain their position and response in relation to trade-offs. Based on the research findings, we formulate recommendations for spatial planning. |
| format | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo |
| id | INTA1836 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateRange | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA18362019-03-21T18:27:56Z When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning Turkelboom, Francis Leone, Michael Jacobs, Sander Kelemen, Eszter García-Llorente, Marina Baró, Francesc Termansen, Mette Barton, David N. Berry, Pam Stange, Erik Thoonen, Marijke Kalóczkai, Ágnes Vadineanu, Angheluta Castro, Antonio J. Czúcz, Bálint Röckmann, Christine Wurbs, Daniel Odee, David Preda, Elena Gómez-Baggethun, Erik Rusch, Graciela M. Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José Palomo, Ignacio Dick, Jan Casaer, Jim van Dijk, Jiska Priess, Joerg A. Langemeyer, Johannes Mustajoki, Jyri Kopperoinen, Leena Baptist, Martin J. Peri, Pablo Luis Rusch, Veronica Elena Mukhopadhyay, Raktima Aszalós, Réka Roy, S.B. Luque, Sandra Agroecosistemas Valores Culturales Agroecosystems Cultural Values Servicios Ecosistémicos Spatial planning has to deal with trade-offs between various stakeholders’ wishes and needs as part of planning and management of landscapes, natural resources and/or biodiversity. To make ecosystem services (ES) trade-off research more relevant for spatial planning, we propose an analytical framework, which puts stakeholders, their land-use/management choices, their impact on ES and responses at the centre. Based on 24 cases from around the world, we used this framing to analyse the appearance and diversity of real-world ES trade-offs. They cover a wide range of trade-offs related to ecosystem use, including: land-use change, management regimes, technical versus nature-based solutions, natural resource use, and management of species. The ES trade-offs studied featured a complexity that was far greater than what is often described in the ES literature. Influential users and context setters are at the core of the trade-off decision-making, but most of the impact is felt by non-influential users. Provisioning and cultural ES were the most targeted in the studied trade-offs, but regulating ES were the most impacted. Stakeholders’ characteristics, such as influence, impact faced, and concerns can partially explain their position and response in relation to trade-offs. Based on the research findings, we formulate recommendations for spatial planning. EEA Bariloche Fil: Turkelboom, Francis. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica Fil: Leone, Michael. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica Fil: Jacobs, Sander. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica Fil: Kelemen, Eszter. Environmental Social Science Research Group; Hungría. University of Budapest. Department of Decision Sciences; Hungría Fil: García-Llorente, Marina. Madrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development. Department of Applied Research and Agricultural Extension; España. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Department of Ecology. Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory; España Fil: Baró, Francesc. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España Fil: Termansen, Mette. Aarhus University. Environmental Science; Dinamarca Fil: Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Berry, Pam. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña Fil: Stange, Erik. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Thoonen, Marijke. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica Fil: Kalóczkai, Ágnes. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría Fil: Vadineanu, Angheluta. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania Fil: Castro, Antonio J. Idaho State University. Department of Biological Sciences. Social-Ecological Research Laboratory; Estados Unidos. University of Almería. Andalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change; España Fil: Czúcz, Bálint. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría. Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity; Francia Fil: Röckmann, Christine. Wageningen University & Research – Wageningen Marine Research; Holanda Fil: Wurbs, Daniel. Geoflux GbR; Alemania Fil: Odee, David. Kenya Forestry Research Institute; Kenia Fil: Preda, Elena. University of Bucharest. Research Center in Systems Ecology and Sustainability; Rumania Fil: Gómez-Baggethun, Erik. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Department of International Environment and Development Studies; Noruega. University of Oxford. Environmental Change Institute; Gran Bretaña Fil: Rusch, Graciela M. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina Fil: Palomo, Ignacio. University of the Basque Country. Basque Centre for Climate Change; España. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Department of Ecology. Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory; España Fil: Dick, Jan. Center for Ecology and Hydrology; Gran Bretaña Fil: Casaer, Jim. Research Institute for Nature and Forest; Bélgica Fil: van Dijk, Jiska. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA; Noruega Fil: Priess, Joerg A. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research; Alemania Fil: Langemeyer, Johannes. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology; España. Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute. Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability; España Fil: Mustajoki, Jyri. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia Fil: Kopperoinen, Leena. Finnish Environment Institute; Finlandia Fil: Baptist, Martin J. Wageningen University & Research – Wageningen Marine Research; Holanda Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Argentina Fil: Rusch, Veronica Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Mukhopadhyay, Raktima. Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development, India Fil: Aszalós, Réka. Institute of Ecology and Botany, MTA Centre for Ecological Research; Hungría Fil: Roy, S.B. Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development, India Fil: Luque, Sandra. National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture; Francia 2017-12-28T17:35:53Z 2017-12-28T17:35:53Z 2017 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1836 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Ecosystem services 29 Part C : 566-578. (February 2018) |
| spellingShingle | Agroecosistemas Valores Culturales Agroecosystems Cultural Values Servicios Ecosistémicos Turkelboom, Francis Leone, Michael Jacobs, Sander Kelemen, Eszter García-Llorente, Marina Baró, Francesc Termansen, Mette Barton, David N. Berry, Pam Stange, Erik Thoonen, Marijke Kalóczkai, Ágnes Vadineanu, Angheluta Castro, Antonio J. Czúcz, Bálint Röckmann, Christine Wurbs, Daniel Odee, David Preda, Elena Gómez-Baggethun, Erik Rusch, Graciela M. Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José Palomo, Ignacio Dick, Jan Casaer, Jim van Dijk, Jiska Priess, Joerg A. Langemeyer, Johannes Mustajoki, Jyri Kopperoinen, Leena Baptist, Martin J. Peri, Pablo Luis Rusch, Veronica Elena Mukhopadhyay, Raktima Aszalós, Réka Roy, S.B. Luque, Sandra When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning |
| title | When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning |
| title_full | When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning |
| title_fullStr | When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning |
| title_full_unstemmed | When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning |
| title_short | When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning |
| title_sort | when we cannot have it all ecosystem services trade offs in the context of spatial planning |
| topic | Agroecosistemas Valores Culturales Agroecosystems Cultural Values Servicios Ecosistémicos |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/1836 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041617300256 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT turkelboomfrancis whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT leonemichael whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT jacobssander whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT kelemeneszter whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT garciallorentemarina whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT barofrancesc whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT termansenmette whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT bartondavidn whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT berrypam whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT stangeerik whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT thoonenmarijke whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT kaloczkaiagnes whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT vadineanuangheluta whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT castroantonioj whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT czuczbalint whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT rockmannchristine whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT wurbsdaniel whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT odeedavid whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT predaelena whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT gomezbaggethunerik whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT ruschgracielam whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT martinezpasturguillermojose whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT palomoignacio whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT dickjan whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT casaerjim whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT vandijkjiska whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT priessjoerga whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT langemeyerjohannes whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT mustajokijyri whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT kopperoinenleena whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT baptistmartinj whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT peripabloluis whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT ruschveronicaelena whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT mukhopadhyayraktima whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT aszalosreka whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT roysb whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning AT luquesandra whenwecannothaveitallecosystemservicestradeoffsinthecontextofspatialplanning |