Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake

Upland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Bernardi, María, Priano, María Eugenia, Fernandez, María Elena, Gyenge, Javier, Juliarena, Maria Paula
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16916
https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.13017
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13017
_version_ 1855485854355554304
author De Bernardi, María
Priano, María Eugenia
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
author_browse De Bernardi, María
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
Priano, María Eugenia
author_facet De Bernardi, María
Priano, María Eugenia
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
author_sort De Bernardi, María
collection INTA Digital
description Upland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the original system and the new land use converted. Our study focused on determining the differences in soil CH4 uptake because of changes in land use (from natural grassland to agricultural land and two Pinus radiata afforestation, differing in thinning management) and on determining which are the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in the studied soil type (Hapludoll), with focus on the diffusion process. CH4 fluxes were measured 12 times with the static chamber technique between October 2015 and April 2019. Also, CH4 gradient concentration in the soil profile and physical and chemical variables were measured on the same dates. All land uses studied acted as net CH4 sinks. Land-use change from grassland to agriculture decreased soil CH4 uptake (~37% ± 19), whereas afforestation increased (~85% ± 73) this environmental service related to natural grassland. We found that the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in this soil are water and air-filled pore space, variables that govern soil CH4 diffusion; they are mostly related to differences in bulk density (compaction) among land uses. Organic matter was also an important driver, mainly related to soil structure. Land-use change affected all of these drivers. CH4 concentration presented differences at deeper soil layers only in the two afforestations, which differed in management (pruning and thinning vs. no management). However, CH4 uptake did not present significant differences between them, suggesting that there is no need for a high tree cover to increase the CH4 sink of the soil. This mixed tree and herbaceous cover may result in a similar environmental service output, increasing the options of land uses.
format Artículo
id INTA16916
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling INTA169162024-03-04T17:33:41Z Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake De Bernardi, María Priano, María Eugenia Fernandez, María Elena Gyenge, Javier Juliarena, Maria Paula Pastizal Natural Suelos Agrícolas Plantación Forestal Metano Suelo Natural Pastures Agricultural Soils Forest Plantations Methane Soil Pinus Upland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the original system and the new land use converted. Our study focused on determining the differences in soil CH4 uptake because of changes in land use (from natural grassland to agricultural land and two Pinus radiata afforestation, differing in thinning management) and on determining which are the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in the studied soil type (Hapludoll), with focus on the diffusion process. CH4 fluxes were measured 12 times with the static chamber technique between October 2015 and April 2019. Also, CH4 gradient concentration in the soil profile and physical and chemical variables were measured on the same dates. All land uses studied acted as net CH4 sinks. Land-use change from grassland to agriculture decreased soil CH4 uptake (~37% ± 19), whereas afforestation increased (~85% ± 73) this environmental service related to natural grassland. We found that the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in this soil are water and air-filled pore space, variables that govern soil CH4 diffusion; they are mostly related to differences in bulk density (compaction) among land uses. Organic matter was also an important driver, mainly related to soil structure. Land-use change affected all of these drivers. CH4 concentration presented differences at deeper soil layers only in the two afforestations, which differed in management (pruning and thinning vs. no management). However, CH4 uptake did not present significant differences between them, suggesting that there is no need for a high tree cover to increase the CH4 sink of the soil. This mixed tree and herbaceous cover may result in a similar environmental service output, increasing the options of land uses. EEA Balcarce Fil: De Bernardi, María. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fil: Priano, Maria Eugenia. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Fil: Juliarena, Maria Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. 2024-03-04T17:29:35Z 2024-03-04T17:29:35Z 2024-01-30 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16916 https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.13017 1475-2743 (Online) 0266-0032 (Print) https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13017 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Wiley Soil Use and Management 40 (1) : e13017 (January 2024)
spellingShingle Pastizal Natural
Suelos Agrícolas
Plantación Forestal
Metano
Suelo
Natural Pastures
Agricultural Soils
Forest Plantations
Methane
Soil
Pinus
De Bernardi, María
Priano, María Eugenia
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_full Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_fullStr Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_full_unstemmed Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_short Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_sort natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations effects on soil methane uptake
topic Pastizal Natural
Suelos Agrícolas
Plantación Forestal
Metano
Suelo
Natural Pastures
Agricultural Soils
Forest Plantations
Methane
Soil
Pinus
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16916
https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.13017
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13017
work_keys_str_mv AT debernardimaria naturalgrasslandconversiontoagricultureorpineplantationseffectsonsoilmethaneuptake
AT prianomariaeugenia naturalgrasslandconversiontoagricultureorpineplantationseffectsonsoilmethaneuptake
AT fernandezmariaelena naturalgrasslandconversiontoagricultureorpineplantationseffectsonsoilmethaneuptake
AT gyengejavier naturalgrasslandconversiontoagricultureorpineplantationseffectsonsoilmethaneuptake
AT juliarenamariapaula naturalgrasslandconversiontoagricultureorpineplantationseffectsonsoilmethaneuptake