Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships

The study of social-ecological networks (SENs) has mainly approached nature through a modern and functional to capitalism conception, i.e. a matrix over which human societies develop. Such a conception neglects interdependencies among human and non-human entities and therefore between “culture” and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astegiano, Julia, Andrieu, Jimena, Wajner, Matias, Marquez, Victoria, Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina, Massol, François, Calviño, Ana, Zamudio, Fernando, Saur Palmieri, Valentina
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16235
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065250423000090
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2023.10.002
_version_ 1855485720562499584
author Astegiano, Julia
Andrieu, Jimena
Wajner, Matias
Marquez, Victoria
Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina
Massol, François
Calviño, Ana
Zamudio, Fernando
Saur Palmieri, Valentina
author_browse Andrieu, Jimena
Astegiano, Julia
Calviño, Ana
Marquez, Victoria
Massol, François
Saur Palmieri, Valentina
Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina
Wajner, Matias
Zamudio, Fernando
author_facet Astegiano, Julia
Andrieu, Jimena
Wajner, Matias
Marquez, Victoria
Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina
Massol, François
Calviño, Ana
Zamudio, Fernando
Saur Palmieri, Valentina
author_sort Astegiano, Julia
collection INTA Digital
description The study of social-ecological networks (SENs) has mainly approached nature through a modern and functional to capitalism conception, i.e. a matrix over which human societies develop. Such a conception neglects interdependencies among human and non-human entities and therefore between “culture” and “nature” reproduction, assumes the existence of many cultures but only one nature, understands nature as a pool of resources, goods or services that can be exploited, appropriated or enclosed, and has been pointed out as one of the main causes of the current biodiversity crisis. Based on the work of sociologists and communitarian feminist scholars, here, we propose to conceive social-ecological systems (SES) as the common, i.e. systems that need to be produced through communal political practices that consider human-non-human interdependencies. In this vein, we introduce two frameworks related with the production of the common, relational ontologies and other economies, and present two examples applying them. One example helps rethinking the so-called “humans-wildlife conflicts”, by illustrating the emerging relational role of the “cabrero” (a livestock guardian dog) as a “mediator” of such conflicts, through the lens of ethnobiology.. The other example analyzes human and non-human co production of SESs that produce (and are produced by) honey, honeybees and beekeepers’ Social and Solidarity economies. We think such perspectives may diversify ecologists’ understanding on human-human and human-non-human relationships and thus ecologists’ ideas about the representation of SENs and the reproduction of SESs as the common.
format Capítulo de libro
id INTA16235
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling INTA162352023-12-14T13:29:00Z Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships Astegiano, Julia Andrieu, Jimena Wajner, Matias Marquez, Victoria Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina Massol, François Calviño, Ana Zamudio, Fernando Saur Palmieri, Valentina Etnobiología Redes Sociales Ethnobiology Social Networks The study of social-ecological networks (SENs) has mainly approached nature through a modern and functional to capitalism conception, i.e. a matrix over which human societies develop. Such a conception neglects interdependencies among human and non-human entities and therefore between “culture” and “nature” reproduction, assumes the existence of many cultures but only one nature, understands nature as a pool of resources, goods or services that can be exploited, appropriated or enclosed, and has been pointed out as one of the main causes of the current biodiversity crisis. Based on the work of sociologists and communitarian feminist scholars, here, we propose to conceive social-ecological systems (SES) as the common, i.e. systems that need to be produced through communal political practices that consider human-non-human interdependencies. In this vein, we introduce two frameworks related with the production of the common, relational ontologies and other economies, and present two examples applying them. One example helps rethinking the so-called “humans-wildlife conflicts”, by illustrating the emerging relational role of the “cabrero” (a livestock guardian dog) as a “mediator” of such conflicts, through the lens of ethnobiology.. The other example analyzes human and non-human co production of SESs that produce (and are produced by) honey, honeybees and beekeepers’ Social and Solidarity economies. We think such perspectives may diversify ecologists’ understanding on human-human and human-non-human relationships and thus ecologists’ ideas about the representation of SENs and the reproduction of SESs as the common. EEA San Juan Fil: Astegiano, Julia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Grupo de Interacciones Ecológicas y Conservación; Argentina Fil: Astegiano, Julia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Andrieu, Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Juan; Argentina. Fil: Andrieu, Jimena. Universidad Nacional de San Juan; Argentina. Fil: Wajner, Matias. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Departamento División Biológica y Ecología; Argentina Fil: Wajner, Matias. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Marquez, Victoria. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Grupo de Interacciones Ecológicas y Conservación; Argentina Fil: Marquez, Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Saur Palmieri, Valentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Departamento División Biológica y Ecología; Argentina Fil: Saur Palmieri, Valentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Grupo de Interacciones Ecológicas y Conservación; Argentina Fil: Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Cátedra de Ecología Agrícola; Argentina. Fil: Massol, François. Université de Lille. Institut Pasteur de Lille. Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille; Francia. Fil: Calviño, Ana. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Grupo de Interacciones Ecológicas y Conservación; Argentina Fil: Calviño, Ana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil. Zamudio, Fernando. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Grupo de Interacciones Ecológicas y Conservación; Argentina Fil: Zamudio, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina 2023-12-14T13:15:44Z 2023-12-14T13:15:44Z 2023-11 info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16235 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065250423000090 978-0-443-19298-2 0065-2504 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2023.10.002 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Elsevier Advances in Ecological Research: Roadmaps: Part B Volume 69 : 45-67. (2023)
spellingShingle Etnobiología
Redes Sociales
Ethnobiology
Social Networks
Astegiano, Julia
Andrieu, Jimena
Wajner, Matias
Marquez, Victoria
Torrico Chalabe, Julieta Karina
Massol, François
Calviño, Ana
Zamudio, Fernando
Saur Palmieri, Valentina
Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships
title Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships
title_full Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships
title_fullStr Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships
title_full_unstemmed Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships
title_short Commoning social-ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies: how ecologists can diversify their notions of human-non-human relationships
title_sort commoning social ecological networks through the lens of relational ontologies and other economies how ecologists can diversify their notions of human non human relationships
topic Etnobiología
Redes Sociales
Ethnobiology
Social Networks
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16235
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065250423000090
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2023.10.002
work_keys_str_mv AT astegianojulia commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT andrieujimena commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT wajnermatias commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT marquezvictoria commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT torricochalabejulietakarina commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT massolfrancois commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT calvinoana commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT zamudiofernando commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships
AT saurpalmierivalentina commoningsocialecologicalnetworksthroughthelensofrelationalontologiesandothereconomieshowecologistscandiversifytheirnotionsofhumannonhumanrelationships