Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel

Suppressing pest populations below economically-damaging levels is an important element of sustainable peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production. Peanut farmers and their advisors often approach pest management with similar goals regardless of where they are located. Anticipating pest outbreaks using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordan, David L., Buol, Greg S, Brandenburg, Rick L, Reisig, Dominic, Nboyine, Jerry, Abudulai, Mumuni, Oteng-Frimpong, Richard, Brandford Mochiah, Moses, Asibuo, James Y., Arthur, Stephen, Paredes, Juan Andrés, Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto, Rhoads, James
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Language:Inglés
Published: Entomological Society of America 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13285
https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article/13/1/20/6654612
https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmac017
_version_ 1855036908797689856
author Jordan, David L.
Buol, Greg S
Brandenburg, Rick L
Reisig, Dominic
Nboyine, Jerry
Abudulai, Mumuni
Oteng-Frimpong, Richard
Brandford Mochiah, Moses
Asibuo, James Y.
Arthur, Stephen
Paredes, Juan Andrés
Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto
Rhoads, James
author_browse Abudulai, Mumuni
Arthur, Stephen
Asibuo, James Y.
Brandenburg, Rick L
Brandford Mochiah, Moses
Buol, Greg S
Jordan, David L.
Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto
Nboyine, Jerry
Oteng-Frimpong, Richard
Paredes, Juan Andrés
Reisig, Dominic
Rhoads, James
author_facet Jordan, David L.
Buol, Greg S
Brandenburg, Rick L
Reisig, Dominic
Nboyine, Jerry
Abudulai, Mumuni
Oteng-Frimpong, Richard
Brandford Mochiah, Moses
Asibuo, James Y.
Arthur, Stephen
Paredes, Juan Andrés
Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto
Rhoads, James
author_sort Jordan, David L.
collection INTA Digital
description Suppressing pest populations below economically-damaging levels is an important element of sustainable peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production. Peanut farmers and their advisors often approach pest management with similar goals regardless of where they are located. Anticipating pest outbreaks using field history and monitoring pest populations are fundamental to protecting yield and financial investment. Microsoft Excel was used to develop individual risk indices for pests, a composite assessment of risk, and costs of risk mitigation practices for peanut in Argentina, Ghana, India, Malawi, and North Carolina (NC) in the United States (US). Depending on pests and resources available to manage pests, risk tools vary considerably, especially in the context of other crops that are grown in sequence with peanut, cultivars, and chemical inputs. In Argentina, India, and the US where more tools (e.g., mechanization and pesticides) are available, risk indices for a wide array of economically important pests were developed with the assumption that reducing risk to those pests likely will impact peanut yield in a positive manner. In Ghana and Malawi where fewer management tools are available, risks to yield and aflatoxin contamination are presented without risk indices for individual pests. The Microsoft Excel platform can be updated as new and additional information on effectiveness of management practices becomes apparent. Tools can be developed using this platform that are appropriate for their geography, environment, cropping systems, and pest complexes and management inputs that are available. In this article we present examples for the risk tool for each country.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA13285
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Entomological Society of America
publisherStr Entomological Society of America
record_format dspace
spelling INTA132852022-11-02T11:23:56Z Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel Jordan, David L. Buol, Greg S Brandenburg, Rick L Reisig, Dominic Nboyine, Jerry Abudulai, Mumuni Oteng-Frimpong, Richard Brandford Mochiah, Moses Asibuo, James Y. Arthur, Stephen Paredes, Juan Andrés Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto Rhoads, James Agronomy Crop Rotation Pesticides Arachis Hypogaea Plaguicidas Agronomía Rotación de Cultivos Cultivar Resistance Maní Decision Tool IPM-Agriculture Peanut Suppressing pest populations below economically-damaging levels is an important element of sustainable peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production. Peanut farmers and their advisors often approach pest management with similar goals regardless of where they are located. Anticipating pest outbreaks using field history and monitoring pest populations are fundamental to protecting yield and financial investment. Microsoft Excel was used to develop individual risk indices for pests, a composite assessment of risk, and costs of risk mitigation practices for peanut in Argentina, Ghana, India, Malawi, and North Carolina (NC) in the United States (US). Depending on pests and resources available to manage pests, risk tools vary considerably, especially in the context of other crops that are grown in sequence with peanut, cultivars, and chemical inputs. In Argentina, India, and the US where more tools (e.g., mechanization and pesticides) are available, risk indices for a wide array of economically important pests were developed with the assumption that reducing risk to those pests likely will impact peanut yield in a positive manner. In Ghana and Malawi where fewer management tools are available, risks to yield and aflatoxin contamination are presented without risk indices for individual pests. The Microsoft Excel platform can be updated as new and additional information on effectiveness of management practices becomes apparent. Tools can be developed using this platform that are appropriate for their geography, environment, cropping systems, and pest complexes and management inputs that are available. In this article we present examples for the risk tool for each country. Instituto de Patología Vegetal Fil: Jordan, David L. North Carolina State University. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Buol, Greg S. North Carolina State University. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Brandenburg, Rick L. North Carolina State University. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology; Estados Unidos Fil: Reisig, Dominic. North Carolina State University. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology; Estados Unidos Fil: Nboyine, Jerry. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Savanna Agricultural Research Institute; Ghana Fil: Abudulai, Mumuni. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Savanna Agricultural Research Institute; Ghana Fil: Oteng-Frimpong, Richard.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Savanna Agricultural Research Institute; Ghana Fil: Brandford Mochiah, Moses.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Crops Research Institute; Ghana Fil: Asibuo, James Y. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Crops Research Institute; Ghana Fil: Arthur, Stephen. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. Crops Research Institute; Ghana Fil: Paredes, Juan Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad de Fitopatología y Modelización Agrícola (UFyMA); Argentina Fil: Paredes, Juan Andrés. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina Fil: Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad de Fitopatología y Modelización Agrícola (UFyMA); Argentina Fil: Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina Fil: Rhoads, James. University of Georgia. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Peanut; Estados Unidos 2022-11-02T11:15:40Z 2022-11-02T11:15:40Z 2022-08-03 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13285 https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article/13/1/20/6654612 2155-7470 (online) https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmac017 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Entomological Society of America Journal of Integrated Pest Management, Volume 13 (1) : 1-15 (2022)
spellingShingle Agronomy
Crop Rotation
Pesticides
Arachis Hypogaea
Plaguicidas
Agronomía
Rotación de Cultivos
Cultivar Resistance
Maní
Decision Tool
IPM-Agriculture
Peanut
Jordan, David L.
Buol, Greg S
Brandenburg, Rick L
Reisig, Dominic
Nboyine, Jerry
Abudulai, Mumuni
Oteng-Frimpong, Richard
Brandford Mochiah, Moses
Asibuo, James Y.
Arthur, Stephen
Paredes, Juan Andrés
Monguillot, Joaquín Humberto
Rhoads, James
Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel
title Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel
title_full Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel
title_fullStr Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel
title_full_unstemmed Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel
title_short Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel
title_sort examples of risk tools for pests in peanut arachis hypogaea developed for five countries using microsoft excel
topic Agronomy
Crop Rotation
Pesticides
Arachis Hypogaea
Plaguicidas
Agronomía
Rotación de Cultivos
Cultivar Resistance
Maní
Decision Tool
IPM-Agriculture
Peanut
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/13285
https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article/13/1/20/6654612
https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmac017
work_keys_str_mv AT jordandavidl examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT buolgregs examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT brandenburgrickl examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT reisigdominic examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT nboyinejerry examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT abudulaimumuni examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT otengfrimpongrichard examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT brandfordmochiahmoses examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT asibuojamesy examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT arthurstephen examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT paredesjuanandres examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT monguillotjoaquinhumberto examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel
AT rhoadsjames examplesofrisktoolsforpestsinpeanutarachishypogaeadevelopedforfivecountriesusingmicrosoftexcel