Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests
Most of the native forests in Argentina are used for livestock production with little sustainable silvopastoral management. Our objective here is to discuss different management strategies where natural and human capital are combined to co-produce cosystem services (ES) provided by silvopastoral sys...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Asociación Argentina de Ecología.
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12971 http://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1872 https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.1.1872 |
| _version_ | 1855485077135294464 |
|---|---|
| author | Peri, Pablo Luis Rosas, Yamina Micaela Lopez, Dardo Ruben Lencinas, María Vanessa Cavallero, Laura Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
| author_browse | Cavallero, Laura Lencinas, María Vanessa Lopez, Dardo Ruben Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Peri, Pablo Luis Rosas, Yamina Micaela |
| author_facet | Peri, Pablo Luis Rosas, Yamina Micaela Lopez, Dardo Ruben Lencinas, María Vanessa Cavallero, Laura Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
| author_sort | Peri, Pablo Luis |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Most of the native forests in Argentina are used for livestock production with little sustainable silvopastoral management. Our objective here is to discuss different management strategies where natural and human capital are combined to co-produce cosystem services (ES) provided by silvopastoral systems in native forests, interacting with different ecosystem functions and biodiversity. Also, we provide perspectives that should be analyzed in a context of socio-ecological approaches in agro-forestry landscapes. Four types of theoretical strategies are proposed (win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose), which define the social-ecological and economic thresholds that determine the provision of ES and biodiversity in the long term. The evidence of the win-lose strategy occurs when the silvopastoral systems are managed mainly to increase economic profitability through increments in forage biomass aimed to increase livestock production in the medium and long term. Deferred deforestation was presented as a typical example of lose-lose strategy in the Chaco region based on short-term management strategies by only obtaining commodities (crops or livestock products)
without considering the negative interactions with other ES and loss of biodiversity. The information provided in this work should assist stakeholders and researchers to identify thresholds of economic profitability and ecological resilience in ecosystems under management. The proposed approaches provide a utilitarian vision of ecosystem services and key aspects of social-ecological resilience. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA12971 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Asociación Argentina de Ecología. |
| publisherStr | Asociación Argentina de Ecología. |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA129712022-09-27T10:05:01Z Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests Marco conceptual para definir estrategias de manejo en sistemas silvopastoriles para los bosques nativos Peri, Pablo Luis Rosas, Yamina Micaela Lopez, Dardo Ruben Lencinas, María Vanessa Cavallero, Laura Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Silvopastoral Systems Livestock Biodiversity Ecosystem Services Primary Forestts Resilience Sistemas Silvopascícolas Ganado Biodiversidad Servicios de los Ecosistemas Bosque Primario Resiliencia Forage Biomass Social-ecological System Biomasa Forrajera Sistema Socio-ecológico Most of the native forests in Argentina are used for livestock production with little sustainable silvopastoral management. Our objective here is to discuss different management strategies where natural and human capital are combined to co-produce cosystem services (ES) provided by silvopastoral systems in native forests, interacting with different ecosystem functions and biodiversity. Also, we provide perspectives that should be analyzed in a context of socio-ecological approaches in agro-forestry landscapes. Four types of theoretical strategies are proposed (win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose), which define the social-ecological and economic thresholds that determine the provision of ES and biodiversity in the long term. The evidence of the win-lose strategy occurs when the silvopastoral systems are managed mainly to increase economic profitability through increments in forage biomass aimed to increase livestock production in the medium and long term. Deferred deforestation was presented as a typical example of lose-lose strategy in the Chaco region based on short-term management strategies by only obtaining commodities (crops or livestock products) without considering the negative interactions with other ES and loss of biodiversity. The information provided in this work should assist stakeholders and researchers to identify thresholds of economic profitability and ecological resilience in ecosystems under management. The proposed approaches provide a utilitarian vision of ecosystem services and key aspects of social-ecological resilience. Marco conceptual para definir estrategias de manejo en sistemas silvopastoriles para los bosques nativos. La mayoría de los bosques nativos de la Argentina se utilizan para la producción ganadera con escaso manejo silvopastoril sustentable. El objetivo fue discutir diferentes estrategias de manejo en las que el capital natural y el humano se combinan para coproducir los servicios ecosistémicos (SE) que brindan los sistemas silvopastoriles en los bosques nativos, interactuando con la biodiversidad y con diferentes funciones de los ecosistemas. Además, proponemos perspectivas para ser analizadas en un contexto de enfoques social-ecológicos en paisajes agroforestales. Se proponen cuatro tipos de estrategias teóricas (ganar-ganar, ganar-perder, perderganar y perder-perder) que definen los umbrales social-ecológicos y económicos que determinan la provisión de SE y biodiversidad a largo plazo. La evidencia de la estrategia ganar-perder ocurre cuando los sistemas silvopastoriles se manejan principalmente para aumentar la rentabilidad económica a través de incrementos en la biomasa forrajera, a fin de elevar la producción ganadera en el mediano y el largo plazo. La deforestación diferida se presentó como un ejemplo típico de estrategia perder-perder en la región del Chaco, basada en un manejo a corto plazo, obteniendo sólo cultivos de alto valor comercial (cultivos o productos pecuarios) sin considerar las interacciones negativas con otros SE y la pérdida de biodiversidad. La información proporcionada en este trabajo debería ayudar a los tomadores de decisión e investigadores a identificar los umbrales de rentabilidad económica y resiliencia ecológica en los ecosistemas bajo gestión. Los enfoques planteados proveen una visión utilitaria de los servicios ecosistémicos y aspectos claves de resiliencia social-ecológica. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Lopez, Dardo Ruben. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi. Campo Anexo Villa Dolores; Argentina. Fil: Lopez, Dardo Ruben. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. Fil: Cavallero, Laura. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi. Campo Anexo Villa Dolores; Argentina. Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina. 2022-09-27T09:40:51Z 2022-09-27T09:40:51Z 2022-08-25 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12971 http://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1872 Peri P.L.; Rosas Y.M.; Lopez D.R.; Lencinas M.V.; Cavallero L.; Martínez Pastur G. (2022) Conceptual framework to defne management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests. Ecología Austral 32: 749-766. 0327-5477 1667-782X https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.1.1872 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Asociación Argentina de Ecología. Ecología Austral 32 (2bis) : 749-766. (agosto 2022) |
| spellingShingle | Silvopastoral Systems Livestock Biodiversity Ecosystem Services Primary Forestts Resilience Sistemas Silvopascícolas Ganado Biodiversidad Servicios de los Ecosistemas Bosque Primario Resiliencia Forage Biomass Social-ecological System Biomasa Forrajera Sistema Socio-ecológico Peri, Pablo Luis Rosas, Yamina Micaela Lopez, Dardo Ruben Lencinas, María Vanessa Cavallero, Laura Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| title | Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| title_full | Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| title_fullStr | Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| title_full_unstemmed | Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| title_short | Conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| title_sort | conceptual framework to define management strategies for silvopastoral systems in native forests |
| topic | Silvopastoral Systems Livestock Biodiversity Ecosystem Services Primary Forestts Resilience Sistemas Silvopascícolas Ganado Biodiversidad Servicios de los Ecosistemas Bosque Primario Resiliencia Forage Biomass Social-ecological System Biomasa Forrajera Sistema Socio-ecológico |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12971 http://ojs.ecologiaaustral.com.ar/index.php/Ecologia_Austral/article/view/1872 https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.22.32.2.1.1872 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peripabloluis conceptualframeworktodefinemanagementstrategiesforsilvopastoralsystemsinnativeforests AT rosasyaminamicaela conceptualframeworktodefinemanagementstrategiesforsilvopastoralsystemsinnativeforests AT lopezdardoruben conceptualframeworktodefinemanagementstrategiesforsilvopastoralsystemsinnativeforests AT lencinasmariavanessa conceptualframeworktodefinemanagementstrategiesforsilvopastoralsystemsinnativeforests AT cavallerolaura conceptualframeworktodefinemanagementstrategiesforsilvopastoralsystemsinnativeforests AT martinezpasturguillermojose conceptualframeworktodefinemanagementstrategiesforsilvopastoralsystemsinnativeforests AT peripabloluis marcoconceptualparadefinirestrategiasdemanejoensistemassilvopastorilesparalosbosquesnativos AT rosasyaminamicaela marcoconceptualparadefinirestrategiasdemanejoensistemassilvopastorilesparalosbosquesnativos AT lopezdardoruben marcoconceptualparadefinirestrategiasdemanejoensistemassilvopastorilesparalosbosquesnativos AT lencinasmariavanessa marcoconceptualparadefinirestrategiasdemanejoensistemassilvopastorilesparalosbosquesnativos AT cavallerolaura marcoconceptualparadefinirestrategiasdemanejoensistemassilvopastorilesparalosbosquesnativos AT martinezpasturguillermojose marcoconceptualparadefinirestrategiasdemanejoensistemassilvopastorilesparalosbosquesnativos |