Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina

The objective of this study was to analyze the root distribution of grasses and shrubs, at different soil depths, in two ecological sites (ES): highland (forest) and lowland (grassland). The root density (RD) estimation was used as a proxy to test the two-layer hypothesis. Three trenches were dug in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ledesma, Roxana Ramona, Bravo, Sandra, Kunst, Carlos Roberto, Elías, Antonio, Godoy, Jose Alberto, Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen
Formato: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11559
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15324982.2021.2017074
https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2021.2017074
_version_ 1855036595484229632
author Ledesma, Roxana Ramona
Bravo, Sandra
Kunst, Carlos Roberto
Elías, Antonio
Godoy, Jose Alberto
Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen
author_browse Bravo, Sandra
Elías, Antonio
Godoy, Jose Alberto
Kunst, Carlos Roberto
Ledesma, Roxana Ramona
Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen
author_facet Ledesma, Roxana Ramona
Bravo, Sandra
Kunst, Carlos Roberto
Elías, Antonio
Godoy, Jose Alberto
Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen
author_sort Ledesma, Roxana Ramona
collection INTA Digital
description The objective of this study was to analyze the root distribution of grasses and shrubs, at different soil depths, in two ecological sites (ES): highland (forest) and lowland (grassland). The root density (RD) estimation was used as a proxy to test the two-layer hypothesis. Three trenches were dug in both ES and the number of roots m−2 was registered at different depth classes. The roots were classified in categories: (a) life forms (LF), grasses and shrubs and (b) root size (diameter): fine (<0.1 cm), small (0.11–0.5 cm); medium (0.51–1.5 cm) and large (>1.51 cm). Soil bulk density (Bd) was assessed by gravimetric method and its relation with RD was determined by regression analysis. RD was analyzed by using ANOVA with the factors: ES, LF, depth and root size. There were no significant differences in RD between the ES but RD significantly decreased with depth in both ES. In the upper horizons of the forest, there was higher shrubs RD (764 roots m2) than grass RD (128 roots m2) (p < 0.0001). In grassland, grass RD was registered in all the depths. Mean fine root density was greater than the mean of other root size categories. The relationship between RD and Bd was negative and only significant in the forest (p = 0.009). The distribution of roots of both LF in the soil profile of both ES did not respond completely to the two-layer hypothesis since in upper horizons an overlap was observed.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA11559
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
publisherStr Taylor & Francis
record_format dspace
spelling INTA115592022-04-05T13:21:44Z Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina Ledesma, Roxana Ramona Bravo, Sandra Kunst, Carlos Roberto Elías, Antonio Godoy, Jose Alberto Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen Gramineas Arbustos Raíces Ecología Grasses Shrubs Roots Ecology Región Chaco Semiárido The objective of this study was to analyze the root distribution of grasses and shrubs, at different soil depths, in two ecological sites (ES): highland (forest) and lowland (grassland). The root density (RD) estimation was used as a proxy to test the two-layer hypothesis. Three trenches were dug in both ES and the number of roots m−2 was registered at different depth classes. The roots were classified in categories: (a) life forms (LF), grasses and shrubs and (b) root size (diameter): fine (<0.1 cm), small (0.11–0.5 cm); medium (0.51–1.5 cm) and large (>1.51 cm). Soil bulk density (Bd) was assessed by gravimetric method and its relation with RD was determined by regression analysis. RD was analyzed by using ANOVA with the factors: ES, LF, depth and root size. There were no significant differences in RD between the ES but RD significantly decreased with depth in both ES. In the upper horizons of the forest, there was higher shrubs RD (764 roots m2) than grass RD (128 roots m2) (p < 0.0001). In grassland, grass RD was registered in all the depths. Mean fine root density was greater than the mean of other root size categories. The relationship between RD and Bd was negative and only significant in the forest (p = 0.009). The distribution of roots of both LF in the soil profile of both ES did not respond completely to the two-layer hypothesis since in upper horizons an overlap was observed. EEA Santiago del Estero Fil: Ledesma, Roxana Ramona. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina Fil: Bravo, Sandra. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales; Argentina Fil: Kunst, Carlos Roberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina Fil: Elías, Antonio. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias; Argentina Fil: Godoy, Jose Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina Fil: Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santiago del Estero; Argentina 2022-04-05T13:18:59Z 2022-04-05T13:18:59Z 2021-12 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11559 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15324982.2021.2017074 1532-4982 1532-4990 https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2021.2017074 eng info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I504-001/2019-PE-E1-I504-001/AR./Tecnologías para el incremento forrajero y la valorización de servicios ecosistémicos en pastizales naturales con uso ganadero info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E1-I514-001/2019-PE-E1-I514-001/AR./Manejo de Bosques con Ganadería Integrada (MBGI) info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Taylor & Francis Arid Land Research and Management : 1-13 ( Published online: 28 Dec 2021)
spellingShingle Gramineas
Arbustos
Raíces
Ecología
Grasses
Shrubs
Roots
Ecology
Región Chaco Semiárido
Ledesma, Roxana Ramona
Bravo, Sandra
Kunst, Carlos Roberto
Elías, Antonio
Godoy, Jose Alberto
Navarrete, Victor Del Carmen
Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina
title Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina
title_full Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina
title_fullStr Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina
title_short Grass-shrub coexistence: understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the Semiarid Chaco, Argentina
title_sort grass shrub coexistence understanding root distribution in ecological sites of the semiarid chaco argentina
topic Gramineas
Arbustos
Raíces
Ecología
Grasses
Shrubs
Roots
Ecology
Región Chaco Semiárido
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11559
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15324982.2021.2017074
https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2021.2017074
work_keys_str_mv AT ledesmaroxanaramona grassshrubcoexistenceunderstandingrootdistributioninecologicalsitesofthesemiaridchacoargentina
AT bravosandra grassshrubcoexistenceunderstandingrootdistributioninecologicalsitesofthesemiaridchacoargentina
AT kunstcarlosroberto grassshrubcoexistenceunderstandingrootdistributioninecologicalsitesofthesemiaridchacoargentina
AT eliasantonio grassshrubcoexistenceunderstandingrootdistributioninecologicalsitesofthesemiaridchacoargentina
AT godoyjosealberto grassshrubcoexistenceunderstandingrootdistributioninecologicalsitesofthesemiaridchacoargentina
AT navarretevictordelcarmen grassshrubcoexistenceunderstandingrootdistributioninecologicalsitesofthesemiaridchacoargentina