Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive
Olive yield components are first determined during flowering, ovary growth, and fruit set. However, variations of the assimilates available during these important processes have been little studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of source-sink alterations on (i) production of f...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Springer
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11540 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40626-022-00239-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-022-00239-z |
| _version_ | 1855484801424818176 |
|---|---|
| author | Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Calvo, Franco Emmanuel Sanchez, Laura Cecilia Calderon Diaz, Facundo Javier Banco, Adriana Pamela Lemole, Georgina |
| author_browse | Banco, Adriana Pamela Calderon Diaz, Facundo Javier Calvo, Franco Emmanuel Lemole, Georgina Sanchez, Laura Cecilia Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael |
| author_facet | Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Calvo, Franco Emmanuel Sanchez, Laura Cecilia Calderon Diaz, Facundo Javier Banco, Adriana Pamela Lemole, Georgina |
| author_sort | Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael |
| collection | INTA Digital |
| description | Olive yield components are first determined during flowering, ovary growth, and fruit set. However, variations of the assimilates available during these important processes have been little studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of source-sink alterations on (i) production of flowers and their structure, (ii) sink responsiveness source activity, and (iii) the relationship between final fruit mass and flower ovary size. Two levels of shading at 50% and 80% were applied in an orchard cv. Arbequina over three seasons, with two durations: short-period (SP, from harvest up to 20 days after flowering) and long-period (LP, continuous shading from beginning to end of the experimental period). An unshaded Control was included. Control presented the highest fruit yield and was 50% greater than both SP50-LP50, and 80% greater than both SP80-LP80. Fruit number was highly responsive to source-sink alterations. The control and both SP50-LP50 treatments presented similar fruit loads, whereas both SP80-LP80 produced 80% less fruits. Source activity alteration during pre-fruit set affected inflorescence structure. By contrast, during the post-fruit set, it drastically reduced inflorescence production. Fruit mass increased mainly due to fruit growth rate in relation to the assimilate. Reduction in ovary mass due to low source activity during pre-fruit set had a slight influence on final fruit mass when source activity was not limited during the post-fruit set period. Fruit oil concentration was highly conservative across a wide range of source-sink ratios. |
| format | Artículo |
| id | INTA11540 |
| institution | Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina) |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateRange | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | INTA115402022-08-17T13:41:06Z Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Calvo, Franco Emmanuel Sanchez, Laura Cecilia Calderon Diaz, Facundo Javier Banco, Adriana Pamela Lemole, Georgina Olea Europaea Inflorescencias Rendimiento Aceite de Oliva Tasa de Crecimiento Umbría Inflorescences Yields Olive Oil Growth Rate Shading Olivo Sombra Artificial Olive yield components are first determined during flowering, ovary growth, and fruit set. However, variations of the assimilates available during these important processes have been little studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of source-sink alterations on (i) production of flowers and their structure, (ii) sink responsiveness source activity, and (iii) the relationship between final fruit mass and flower ovary size. Two levels of shading at 50% and 80% were applied in an orchard cv. Arbequina over three seasons, with two durations: short-period (SP, from harvest up to 20 days after flowering) and long-period (LP, continuous shading from beginning to end of the experimental period). An unshaded Control was included. Control presented the highest fruit yield and was 50% greater than both SP50-LP50, and 80% greater than both SP80-LP80. Fruit number was highly responsive to source-sink alterations. The control and both SP50-LP50 treatments presented similar fruit loads, whereas both SP80-LP80 produced 80% less fruits. Source activity alteration during pre-fruit set affected inflorescence structure. By contrast, during the post-fruit set, it drastically reduced inflorescence production. Fruit mass increased mainly due to fruit growth rate in relation to the assimilate. Reduction in ovary mass due to low source activity during pre-fruit set had a slight influence on final fruit mass when source activity was not limited during the post-fruit set period. Fruit oil concentration was highly conservative across a wide range of source-sink ratios. EEA Junín Fil: Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina Fil: Calvo, Franco E. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ambiente de Montaña y Regiones Áridas; Argentina Fil: Calvo, Franco E. Universidad Nacional de Chilecito. Instituto de Ambiente de Montaña y Regiones Áridas; Argentina Fil: Sanchez, Laura Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina Fil: Calderon, Facundo J. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina Fil: Banco, Adriana Pamela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Junín; Argentina Fil: Lemole, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Juan. Agencia de Extensión Rural Iglesia; Argentina 2022-04-01T16:59:08Z 2022-04-01T16:59:08Z 2022-03 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11540 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40626-022-00239-z 2197-0025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-022-00239-z eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Springer Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology (Published: 23 March 2022) |
| spellingShingle | Olea Europaea Inflorescencias Rendimiento Aceite de Oliva Tasa de Crecimiento Umbría Inflorescences Yields Olive Oil Growth Rate Shading Olivo Sombra Artificial Trentacoste, Eduardo Rafael Calvo, Franco Emmanuel Sanchez, Laura Cecilia Calderon Diaz, Facundo Javier Banco, Adriana Pamela Lemole, Georgina Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| title | Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| title_full | Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| title_fullStr | Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| title_short | Response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source-sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| title_sort | response of inflorescence structure and oil yield components to source sink manipulation by artificial shading in olive |
| topic | Olea Europaea Inflorescencias Rendimiento Aceite de Oliva Tasa de Crecimiento Umbría Inflorescences Yields Olive Oil Growth Rate Shading Olivo Sombra Artificial |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11540 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40626-022-00239-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-022-00239-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT trentacosteeduardorafael responseofinflorescencestructureandoilyieldcomponentstosourcesinkmanipulationbyartificialshadinginolive AT calvofrancoemmanuel responseofinflorescencestructureandoilyieldcomponentstosourcesinkmanipulationbyartificialshadinginolive AT sanchezlauracecilia responseofinflorescencestructureandoilyieldcomponentstosourcesinkmanipulationbyartificialshadinginolive AT calderondiazfacundojavier responseofinflorescencestructureandoilyieldcomponentstosourcesinkmanipulationbyartificialshadinginolive AT bancoadrianapamela responseofinflorescencestructureandoilyieldcomponentstosourcesinkmanipulationbyartificialshadinginolive AT lemolegeorgina responseofinflorescencestructureandoilyieldcomponentstosourcesinkmanipulationbyartificialshadinginolive |