Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally

Biotic and abiotic factors interact with dominant plants—the locally most frequent or with the largest coverage—and nondominant plants differently, partially because dominant plants modify the environment where nondominant plants grow. For instance, if dominant plants compete strongly, they will dep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnillas, Carlos Alberto, Borer, Elizabeth T., Seabloom, Eric William, Alberti, Juan, Baez, Selene, Bakker, Jonathan D., Boughton, Elizabeth H., Buckley, Yvonne M.  , Bugalho, Miguel Nuno, Donohue, Ian, Dwyer, John, Firn, Jennifer, Peri, Pablo Luis, Cadotte, Marc W.
Formato: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley Ecology and evolution 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11052
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.8266
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8266
_version_ 1855036500920500224
author Arnillas, Carlos Alberto
Borer, Elizabeth T.
Seabloom, Eric William
Alberti, Juan
Baez, Selene
Bakker, Jonathan D.
Boughton, Elizabeth H.
Buckley, Yvonne M.  
Bugalho, Miguel Nuno
Donohue, Ian
Dwyer, John
Firn, Jennifer
Peri, Pablo Luis
Cadotte, Marc W.
author_browse Alberti, Juan
Arnillas, Carlos Alberto
Baez, Selene
Bakker, Jonathan D.
Borer, Elizabeth T.
Boughton, Elizabeth H.
Buckley, Yvonne M.  
Bugalho, Miguel Nuno
Cadotte, Marc W.
Donohue, Ian
Dwyer, John
Firn, Jennifer
Peri, Pablo Luis
Seabloom, Eric William
author_facet Arnillas, Carlos Alberto
Borer, Elizabeth T.
Seabloom, Eric William
Alberti, Juan
Baez, Selene
Bakker, Jonathan D.
Boughton, Elizabeth H.
Buckley, Yvonne M.  
Bugalho, Miguel Nuno
Donohue, Ian
Dwyer, John
Firn, Jennifer
Peri, Pablo Luis
Cadotte, Marc W.
author_sort Arnillas, Carlos Alberto
collection INTA Digital
description Biotic and abiotic factors interact with dominant plants—the locally most frequent or with the largest coverage—and nondominant plants differently, partially because dominant plants modify the environment where nondominant plants grow. For instance, if dominant plants compete strongly, they will deplete most resources, forcing nondominant plants into a narrower niche space. Conversely, if dominant plants are constrained by the environment, they might not exhaust available resources but instead may ameliorate environmental stressors that usually limit nondominants. Hence, the nature of interactions among nondominant species could be modified by dominant species. Furthermore, these differences could translate into a disparity in the phylogenetic relatedness among dominants compared to the relatedness among nondominants. By estimating phylogenetic dispersion in 78 grasslands across five continents, we found that dominant species were clustered (e.g., co-dominant grasses), suggesting dominant species are likely organized by environmental filtering, and that nondominant species were either randomly assembled or overdispersed. Traits showed similar trends for those sites (<50%) with sufficient trait data. Furthermore, several lineages scattered in the phylogeny had more nondominant species than expected at random, suggesting that traits common in nondominants are phylogenetically conserved and have evolved multiple times. We also explored environmental drivers of the dominant/nondominant disparity. We found different assembly patterns for dominants and nondominants, consistent with asymmetries in assembly mechanisms. Among the different postulated mechanisms, our results suggest two complementary hypotheses seldom explored: (1) Nondominant species include lineages adapted to thrive in the environment generated by dominant species. (2) Even when dominant species reduce resources to nondominant ones, dominant species could have a stronger positive effect on some nondominants by ameliorating environmental stressors affecting them, than by depleting resources and increasing the environmental stress to those nondominants. These results show that the dominant/nondominant asymmetry has ecological and evolutionary consequences fundamental to understand plant communities.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
id INTA11052
institution Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA -Argentina)
language Inglés
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Wiley Ecology and evolution
publisherStr Wiley Ecology and evolution
record_format dspace
spelling INTA110522024-02-19T14:06:47Z Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally Arnillas, Carlos Alberto Borer, Elizabeth T. Seabloom, Eric William Alberti, Juan Baez, Selene Bakker, Jonathan D. Boughton, Elizabeth H. Buckley, Yvonne M.   Bugalho, Miguel Nuno Donohue, Ian Dwyer, John Firn, Jennifer Peri, Pablo Luis Cadotte, Marc W. Pastures Phylogeny Dominant Species Abiotic Factors Biotic Factors Nutrients Pastizales Filogenia Especies Dominantes Factores Abióticos Factores Bióticos Nutrientes Community Assembly Patterns Patrones de Ensable de Comunidades Biotic and abiotic factors interact with dominant plants—the locally most frequent or with the largest coverage—and nondominant plants differently, partially because dominant plants modify the environment where nondominant plants grow. For instance, if dominant plants compete strongly, they will deplete most resources, forcing nondominant plants into a narrower niche space. Conversely, if dominant plants are constrained by the environment, they might not exhaust available resources but instead may ameliorate environmental stressors that usually limit nondominants. Hence, the nature of interactions among nondominant species could be modified by dominant species. Furthermore, these differences could translate into a disparity in the phylogenetic relatedness among dominants compared to the relatedness among nondominants. By estimating phylogenetic dispersion in 78 grasslands across five continents, we found that dominant species were clustered (e.g., co-dominant grasses), suggesting dominant species are likely organized by environmental filtering, and that nondominant species were either randomly assembled or overdispersed. Traits showed similar trends for those sites (<50%) with sufficient trait data. Furthermore, several lineages scattered in the phylogeny had more nondominant species than expected at random, suggesting that traits common in nondominants are phylogenetically conserved and have evolved multiple times. We also explored environmental drivers of the dominant/nondominant disparity. We found different assembly patterns for dominants and nondominants, consistent with asymmetries in assembly mechanisms. Among the different postulated mechanisms, our results suggest two complementary hypotheses seldom explored: (1) Nondominant species include lineages adapted to thrive in the environment generated by dominant species. (2) Even when dominant species reduce resources to nondominant ones, dominant species could have a stronger positive effect on some nondominants by ameliorating environmental stressors affecting them, than by depleting resources and increasing the environmental stress to those nondominants. These results show that the dominant/nondominant asymmetry has ecological and evolutionary consequences fundamental to understand plant communities. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Arnillas, Carlos Alberto. University of Toronto Scarborough. Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences; Canadá. Fil: Borer, Elizabeth T. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos Fil: Seabloom, Eric W. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos Fil: Alberti, Juan. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina. Fil: Baez, Selene. Escuela Politécnica Nacional. Department of Biology; Ecuador. Fil: Bakker, Jonathan D. University of Washington. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Boughton, Elizabeth H. Archbold Biological Station. Venus, Florida; Estados Unidos Fil: Buckley, Yvonne M. Trinity College Dublin. School of Natural Sciences, Zoology; Irlanda Fil: Bugalho, Miguel Nuno. University of Lisbon. Centre for Applied Ecology Prof. Baeta Neves (CEABN-InBIO). School of Agriculture; Portugal. Fil: Donohue, Ian. Trinity College Dublin. School of Natural Sciences, Zoology; Irlanda Fil: Dwyer, John. University of Queensland. School of Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Firn, Jennifer. Queensland University of Technology (QUT); Australia. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Cadotte, Marc W. University of Toronto Scarborough. Department of Biological Sciences; Canadá. Fil: Cadotte, Marc W. University of Toronto. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; Canadá. 2022-01-05T10:24:38Z 2022-01-05T10:24:38Z 2021-11-22 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11052 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.8266 Arenillas C.A.;Borer, E.; Seabloom E.; Alberti J.; Baez S.; Bakker J.; Boughton E.; Buckley Y.; Bugalho M.; Donohue I.; Dwyer J.; Firn J.; Gridzak R.; Hagenah N.; Hautier Y.; Helm A.; Jentsch A.; Knops J.; Komatsu K.J.; Laanisto L.; Laungani R.; Mcculley R.; Moore J.; Morgan J.; Peri P.L.; Power S.; Price J.; Sankaran M.; Schamp B.; Speziale K.; Standish R.; Virtanen R. Cadotte M. Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally. Ecology and Evolution 11(24): 17744-17761. 2045-7758 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8266 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf Wiley Ecology and evolution Ecology and Evolution 11 (24) : 17744-17761 (December 2021)
spellingShingle Pastures
Phylogeny
Dominant Species
Abiotic Factors
Biotic Factors
Nutrients
Pastizales
Filogenia
Especies Dominantes
Factores Abióticos
Factores Bióticos
Nutrientes
Community Assembly Patterns
Patrones de Ensable de Comunidades
Arnillas, Carlos Alberto
Borer, Elizabeth T.
Seabloom, Eric William
Alberti, Juan
Baez, Selene
Bakker, Jonathan D.
Boughton, Elizabeth H.
Buckley, Yvonne M.  
Bugalho, Miguel Nuno
Donohue, Ian
Dwyer, John
Firn, Jennifer
Peri, Pablo Luis
Cadotte, Marc W.
Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
title Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
title_full Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
title_fullStr Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
title_full_unstemmed Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
title_short Opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non-dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
title_sort opposing community assembly patterns for dominant and non dominant plant species in herbaceous ecosystems globally
topic Pastures
Phylogeny
Dominant Species
Abiotic Factors
Biotic Factors
Nutrients
Pastizales
Filogenia
Especies Dominantes
Factores Abióticos
Factores Bióticos
Nutrientes
Community Assembly Patterns
Patrones de Ensable de Comunidades
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11052
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.8266
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8266
work_keys_str_mv AT arnillascarlosalberto opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT borerelizabetht opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT seabloomericwilliam opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT albertijuan opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT baezselene opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT bakkerjonathand opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT boughtonelizabethh opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT buckleyyvonnem opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT bugalhomiguelnuno opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT donohueian opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT dwyerjohn opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT firnjennifer opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT peripabloluis opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally
AT cadottemarcw opposingcommunityassemblypatternsfordominantandnondominantplantspeciesinherbaceousecosystemsglobally