Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe

Poor productivity in smallholder farming systems has necessitated research on the potential of crop–livestock integration to sustainably improve productivity. The study hypothesized that improvement in individual agronomic and livestock systems and synergistic utilization of by-products of either sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mkuhlani, S., Mupangwa, W., Macleod, N., Gwiriri, Lovemore C., Nyagumbo, I., Manyawu, Godfrey J., Chigede, N.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98855
_version_ 1855513202381553664
author Mkuhlani, S.
Mupangwa, W.
Macleod, N.
Gwiriri, Lovemore C.
Nyagumbo, I.
Manyawu, Godfrey J.
Chigede, N.
author_browse Chigede, N.
Gwiriri, Lovemore C.
Macleod, N.
Manyawu, Godfrey J.
Mkuhlani, S.
Mupangwa, W.
Nyagumbo, I.
author_facet Mkuhlani, S.
Mupangwa, W.
Macleod, N.
Gwiriri, Lovemore C.
Nyagumbo, I.
Manyawu, Godfrey J.
Chigede, N.
author_sort Mkuhlani, S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Poor productivity in smallholder farming systems has necessitated research on the potential of crop–livestock integration to sustainably improve productivity. The study hypothesized that improvement in individual agronomic and livestock systems and synergistic utilization of by-products of either system increases productivity, profitability and integration. Smallholder farming households were classified into: old and resource endowed (OR); part time (PT); and young, risk-taking and enthusiastic (YRE) following a survey conducted in Murehwa and Goromonzi districts of Zimbabwe. Crop–livestock systems’ integration scenarios were developed for each farmer category. Expression of crop–livestock integration in physical terms, e.g., kg ha−1, can be complex and confounding, hence the expression of integration in monetary values. Baseline scenario results indicate thatORhad the highest crop–livestock integration of $3981 compared withPTandYREdespiteORhaving the lowest manure usage compared withPTandYREfarmers. Moreover,ORhad the least legume yields of <800 compared with 3530 kg ha−1inYREfarmers. Subsequent crop–livestock integration scenarios increased maize grain yields by at least 50%, thus increasing profitability to $1210, $3230 and $3100 yr−1for mucuna, cowpea and groundnut, respectively. Total income increased by 135, 132 and 101% translating to $9880, $2960 and $6290 yr−1inOR,PTandYREfarmers, respectively. Crop–livestock integration therefore has the potential to improve smallholder crop and livestock productivity, variable with socio-economic status.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace98855
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace988552024-08-27T10:34:39Z Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe Mkuhlani, S. Mupangwa, W. Macleod, N. Gwiriri, Lovemore C. Nyagumbo, I. Manyawu, Godfrey J. Chigede, N. livestock mixed farming farming systems food science Poor productivity in smallholder farming systems has necessitated research on the potential of crop–livestock integration to sustainably improve productivity. The study hypothesized that improvement in individual agronomic and livestock systems and synergistic utilization of by-products of either system increases productivity, profitability and integration. Smallholder farming households were classified into: old and resource endowed (OR); part time (PT); and young, risk-taking and enthusiastic (YRE) following a survey conducted in Murehwa and Goromonzi districts of Zimbabwe. Crop–livestock systems’ integration scenarios were developed for each farmer category. Expression of crop–livestock integration in physical terms, e.g., kg ha−1, can be complex and confounding, hence the expression of integration in monetary values. Baseline scenario results indicate thatORhad the highest crop–livestock integration of $3981 compared withPTandYREdespiteORhaving the lowest manure usage compared withPTandYREfarmers. Moreover,ORhad the least legume yields of <800 compared with 3530 kg ha−1inYREfarmers. Subsequent crop–livestock integration scenarios increased maize grain yields by at least 50%, thus increasing profitability to $1210, $3230 and $3100 yr−1for mucuna, cowpea and groundnut, respectively. Total income increased by 135, 132 and 101% translating to $9880, $2960 and $6290 yr−1inOR,PTandYREfarmers, respectively. Crop–livestock integration therefore has the potential to improve smallholder crop and livestock productivity, variable with socio-economic status. 2020-06 2018-12-20T13:32:07Z 2018-12-20T13:32:07Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98855 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Mkuhlani, S., Mupangwa, W., MacLeod, N., Gwiriri, L., Nyagumbo, I., Manyawu, G. and Chigede, N. 2018. Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
spellingShingle livestock
mixed farming
farming systems
food science
Mkuhlani, S.
Mupangwa, W.
Macleod, N.
Gwiriri, Lovemore C.
Nyagumbo, I.
Manyawu, Godfrey J.
Chigede, N.
Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe
title Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe
title_full Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe
title_short Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe
title_sort crop livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of goromonzi and murehwa zimbabwe
topic livestock
mixed farming
farming systems
food science
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98855
work_keys_str_mv AT mkuhlanis croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe
AT mupangwaw croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe
AT macleodn croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe
AT gwiririlovemorec croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe
AT nyagumboi croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe
AT manyawugodfreyj croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe
AT chigeden croplivestockintegrationinsmallholderfarmingsystemsofgoromonziandmurehwazimbabwe