Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia

Objective(s): The study tested the applicability to low-and-middle income settings of a System Effects model developed for high-income countries. The objective is to better understand the damage caused by foodborne diseases, and barriers for consumers in accessing safer food. Materials and methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roesel, Kristina, Craven, L., Ty, C., Hung Nguyen-Viet, Grace, Delia
Formato: Póster
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Livestock Research Institute 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98397
_version_ 1855523596799049728
author Roesel, Kristina
Craven, L.
Ty, C.
Hung Nguyen-Viet
Grace, Delia
author_browse Craven, L.
Grace, Delia
Hung Nguyen-Viet
Roesel, Kristina
Ty, C.
author_facet Roesel, Kristina
Craven, L.
Ty, C.
Hung Nguyen-Viet
Grace, Delia
author_sort Roesel, Kristina
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Objective(s): The study tested the applicability to low-and-middle income settings of a System Effects model developed for high-income countries. The objective is to better understand the damage caused by foodborne diseases, and barriers for consumers in accessing safer food. Materials and methods: In January 2018, ten group sessions with 66 participants were held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Five were organized in low and five in middle income areas of the city. The participants, half of them women, were purposively recruited, of similar background but not knowing each other. Each group discussion consisted of two exercises that was completed by each participant individually. The first exercise mapped impacts to visually depict the complexity of peoples’ experience of unsafe food including damage caused, flows of effects, and interconnections between them. In the second exercise, barriers to avoiding unsafe food were illustrated. Circumstances, incidents, pre-existing conditions that make it harder to get safe food were described. Results: More than 600 consequence items of eating unsafe food were listed by all participants, with little variation between low and middle income groups as well as between men and women. While most concerned health and economic impact, women in the middle income group listed several social consequences. More than 250 items described barriers to accessing safe food, most dealing with lack of money, lack of accessibility as well as limitations to tell safe from unsafe food. The items were coded and grouped, adjacency matrices generated, impacts and barriers aggregated and the density of connections made between different impacts and barriers evaluated. Conclusions: The findings can help to understand impact and components of resilience that could help inform food safety intervention design.
format Poster
id CGSpace98397
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher International Livestock Research Institute
publisherStr International Livestock Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace983972025-11-04T17:28:01Z Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia Roesel, Kristina Craven, L. Ty, C. Hung Nguyen-Viet Grace, Delia food safety research Objective(s): The study tested the applicability to low-and-middle income settings of a System Effects model developed for high-income countries. The objective is to better understand the damage caused by foodborne diseases, and barriers for consumers in accessing safer food. Materials and methods: In January 2018, ten group sessions with 66 participants were held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Five were organized in low and five in middle income areas of the city. The participants, half of them women, were purposively recruited, of similar background but not knowing each other. Each group discussion consisted of two exercises that was completed by each participant individually. The first exercise mapped impacts to visually depict the complexity of peoples’ experience of unsafe food including damage caused, flows of effects, and interconnections between them. In the second exercise, barriers to avoiding unsafe food were illustrated. Circumstances, incidents, pre-existing conditions that make it harder to get safe food were described. Results: More than 600 consequence items of eating unsafe food were listed by all participants, with little variation between low and middle income groups as well as between men and women. While most concerned health and economic impact, women in the middle income group listed several social consequences. More than 250 items described barriers to accessing safe food, most dealing with lack of money, lack of accessibility as well as limitations to tell safe from unsafe food. The items were coded and grouped, adjacency matrices generated, impacts and barriers aggregated and the density of connections made between different impacts and barriers evaluated. Conclusions: The findings can help to understand impact and components of resilience that could help inform food safety intervention design. 2018-11-15 2018-12-03T08:39:46Z 2018-12-03T08:39:46Z Poster https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98397 en Open Access application/pdf International Livestock Research Institute Roesel, K., Craven, L., Ty, C., Hung Nguyen-Viet and Grace, D. 2018. Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: an example from urban Cambodia. Poster prepared for the 15th International Symposium of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 15 November 2018. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.
spellingShingle food safety
research
Roesel, Kristina
Craven, L.
Ty, C.
Hung Nguyen-Viet
Grace, Delia
Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia
title Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia
title_full Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia
title_fullStr Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia
title_full_unstemmed Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia
title_short Using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low-income-countries: An example from urban Cambodia
title_sort using system effects modelling to evaluate food safety impact and barriers in low income countries an example from urban cambodia
topic food safety
research
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98397
work_keys_str_mv AT roeselkristina usingsystemeffectsmodellingtoevaluatefoodsafetyimpactandbarriersinlowincomecountriesanexamplefromurbancambodia
AT cravenl usingsystemeffectsmodellingtoevaluatefoodsafetyimpactandbarriersinlowincomecountriesanexamplefromurbancambodia
AT tyc usingsystemeffectsmodellingtoevaluatefoodsafetyimpactandbarriersinlowincomecountriesanexamplefromurbancambodia
AT hungnguyenviet usingsystemeffectsmodellingtoevaluatefoodsafetyimpactandbarriersinlowincomecountriesanexamplefromurbancambodia
AT gracedelia usingsystemeffectsmodellingtoevaluatefoodsafetyimpactandbarriersinlowincomecountriesanexamplefromurbancambodia