Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation
Cost-effective genotyping of livestock species can be done through a process which involves genotyping part of the population using a high density (HD) panel and the remainder with a lower density panel and then use imputation to infer the missing genotypes that are not included on the low density p...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Conference Paper |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98244 |
| _version_ | 1855530721168326656 |
|---|---|
| author | Aliloo, Hassan Mrode, Raphael A. Okeyo Mwai, Ally Ojango, Julie M.K. Dessie, Tadelle Rege, J.E.O. Goddard, M. Gibson, John P. |
| author_browse | Aliloo, Hassan Dessie, Tadelle Gibson, John P. Goddard, M. Mrode, Raphael A. Ojango, Julie M.K. Okeyo Mwai, Ally Rege, J.E.O. |
| author_facet | Aliloo, Hassan Mrode, Raphael A. Okeyo Mwai, Ally Ojango, Julie M.K. Dessie, Tadelle Rege, J.E.O. Goddard, M. Gibson, John P. |
| author_sort | Aliloo, Hassan |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Cost-effective genotyping of livestock species can be done through a process which involves genotyping part of the population using a high density (HD) panel and the remainder with a lower density panel and then use imputation to infer the missing genotypes that are not included on the low density panel. Therefore, it is desirable to have a method of selecting markers for an assay that maximises imputation accuracy. Here we present a marker selection method that relies on the pairwise (co)variances between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the minor allele frequency (MAF) of SNPs. The performance of the developed method was tested in a 5 fold cross-validation process using genotypes of crossbred dairy cattle in East Africa, a population in which it is unclear whether existing low density SNP assays designed for purebred populations will maintain high imputation accuracies. Various densities of SNPs were selected using the (co)variance method and alternative SNP selection methods and then imputed up to the HD panel. The (co)variance method provided the highest imputation accuracies at all marker densities, with accuracies being up to 19% higher than the random selection of SNPs. The presented method is straightforward in its application and can ensure high accuracies in genotype imputation of crossbred dairy population in East Africa. |
| format | Conference Paper |
| id | CGSpace98244 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateRange | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace982442025-11-04T16:58:39Z Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation Aliloo, Hassan Mrode, Raphael A. Okeyo Mwai, Ally Ojango, Julie M.K. Dessie, Tadelle Rege, J.E.O. Goddard, M. Gibson, John P. animal breeding genetics livestock Cost-effective genotyping of livestock species can be done through a process which involves genotyping part of the population using a high density (HD) panel and the remainder with a lower density panel and then use imputation to infer the missing genotypes that are not included on the low density panel. Therefore, it is desirable to have a method of selecting markers for an assay that maximises imputation accuracy. Here we present a marker selection method that relies on the pairwise (co)variances between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the minor allele frequency (MAF) of SNPs. The performance of the developed method was tested in a 5 fold cross-validation process using genotypes of crossbred dairy cattle in East Africa, a population in which it is unclear whether existing low density SNP assays designed for purebred populations will maintain high imputation accuracies. Various densities of SNPs were selected using the (co)variance method and alternative SNP selection methods and then imputed up to the HD panel. The (co)variance method provided the highest imputation accuracies at all marker densities, with accuracies being up to 19% higher than the random selection of SNPs. The presented method is straightforward in its application and can ensure high accuracies in genotype imputation of crossbred dairy population in East Africa. 2018 2018-11-18T17:42:42Z 2018-11-18T17:42:42Z Conference Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98244 en Open Access application/pdf Aliloo, H., Mrode, R., Okeyo, M., Ojango, J., Dessie, T., Rege, E., Goddard, M. and Gibson, J. 2018. Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation. IN: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Volume Technologies - Genotyping: 146. |
| spellingShingle | animal breeding genetics livestock Aliloo, Hassan Mrode, Raphael A. Okeyo Mwai, Ally Ojango, Julie M.K. Dessie, Tadelle Rege, J.E.O. Goddard, M. Gibson, John P. Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| title | Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| title_full | Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| title_fullStr | Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| title_short | Optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| title_sort | optimal design of low density marker panels for genotype imputation |
| topic | animal breeding genetics livestock |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/98244 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aliloohassan optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT mroderaphaela optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT okeyomwaially optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT ojangojuliemk optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT dessietadelle optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT regejeo optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT goddardm optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation AT gibsonjohnp optimaldesignoflowdensitymarkerpanelsforgenotypeimputation |