Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing

Background Referencing is an integral part of scientific writing and professional research conduct that requires appropriate acknowledgement of others’ work and avoidance of plagiarism. University students should understand and apply this as part of their academic development, but for this, it is es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindahl, Johanna F., Grace, Delia
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97826
_version_ 1855542007787683840
author Lindahl, Johanna F.
Grace, Delia
author_browse Grace, Delia
Lindahl, Johanna F.
author_facet Lindahl, Johanna F.
Grace, Delia
author_sort Lindahl, Johanna F.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background Referencing is an integral part of scientific writing and professional research conduct that requires appropriate acknowledgement of others’ work and avoidance of plagiarism. University students should understand and apply this as part of their academic development, but for this, it is essential that supervisors also display proper research integrity and support. Methods This study used an online educative questionnaire to understand the knowledge and attitudes of students and supervisors at two institutes in Europe and Africa. The results were then used to create discussion around education of students and faculty in workshops and lectures. Results Overall, 138 students and 14 supervisors participated: most were Swedish (89) and Kenyan (11). Overall, 98% had heard about plagiarism, and 35% believed it was common. Only 45% had heard about self-plagiarism, and when explained what it was, 44.5% considered it morally wrong. Europeans and North Americans had more knowledge than other nationalities. Most (85%) had received some training on referencing, but there was little consensus about principles, with more than 30% considering it acceptable to cite a reference in a paper they had not read. Discussing these results and the questions in workshops was helpful; it was also clear that there was no consensus among supervisors on what constituted correct behavior. Conclusions This survey shows a need for greater consensus on appropriate referencing, and that there is need for more discussions and training on the topic for both students and faculty.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace97826
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace978262024-05-01T08:19:57Z Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing Lindahl, Johanna F. Grace, Delia research Background Referencing is an integral part of scientific writing and professional research conduct that requires appropriate acknowledgement of others’ work and avoidance of plagiarism. University students should understand and apply this as part of their academic development, but for this, it is essential that supervisors also display proper research integrity and support. Methods This study used an online educative questionnaire to understand the knowledge and attitudes of students and supervisors at two institutes in Europe and Africa. The results were then used to create discussion around education of students and faculty in workshops and lectures. Results Overall, 138 students and 14 supervisors participated: most were Swedish (89) and Kenyan (11). Overall, 98% had heard about plagiarism, and 35% believed it was common. Only 45% had heard about self-plagiarism, and when explained what it was, 44.5% considered it morally wrong. Europeans and North Americans had more knowledge than other nationalities. Most (85%) had received some training on referencing, but there was little consensus about principles, with more than 30% considering it acceptable to cite a reference in a paper they had not read. Discussing these results and the questions in workshops was helpful; it was also clear that there was no consensus among supervisors on what constituted correct behavior. Conclusions This survey shows a need for greater consensus on appropriate referencing, and that there is need for more discussions and training on the topic for both students and faculty. 2018-12 2018-10-29T08:08:16Z 2018-10-29T08:08:16Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97826 en Open Access Springer Lindahl, J.F. and Grace, D. 2018. Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing. Research Integrity and Peer Review 3: 10.
spellingShingle research
Lindahl, Johanna F.
Grace, Delia
Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
title Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
title_full Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
title_fullStr Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
title_full_unstemmed Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
title_short Students’ and supervisors’ knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
title_sort students and supervisors knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencing
topic research
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97826
work_keys_str_mv AT lindahljohannaf studentsandsupervisorsknowledgeandattitudesregardingplagiarismandreferencing
AT gracedelia studentsandsupervisorsknowledgeandattitudesregardingplagiarismandreferencing