Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda

Although the political context in Uganda exhibits democratic deficit and patronage, research and development actors have given little attention to the possible negative impact these may have on agricultural policymaking and implementation processes. This article examines the influence of power in pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yami, M., Asten, Piet J.A. van, Hauser, M., Schut, Marc, Pali, Pamela N.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Wiley 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97531
_version_ 1855541620753039360
author Yami, M.
Asten, Piet J.A. van
Hauser, M.
Schut, Marc
Pali, Pamela N.
author_browse Asten, Piet J.A. van
Hauser, M.
Pali, Pamela N.
Schut, Marc
Yami, M.
author_facet Yami, M.
Asten, Piet J.A. van
Hauser, M.
Schut, Marc
Pali, Pamela N.
author_sort Yami, M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Although the political context in Uganda exhibits democratic deficit and patronage, research and development actors have given little attention to the possible negative impact these may have on agricultural policymaking and implementation processes. This article examines the influence of power in perpetuating prevailing narratives around public participation in agricultural policymaking processes. The analysis is based on qualitative data collected between September 2014 and May 2015 using 86 in‐depth interviews, 18 focus group discussions, and recorded observations in stakeholder consultations. Results indicate that while the political setting provides space for uncensored debates, the policymaking process remains under close control of political leaders, technical personnel, and high‐level officers in the government. Policy negotiation remains limited to actors who are knowledgeable about the technical issues and those who have the financial resources and political power to influence decisions, such as international donors. There is limited space for negotiation of competing claims and interests in the processes by public and private actors actively engaged in agricultural development, production, processing, and trade. Thus, efforts to achieve good governance in policy processes fall short due to lack of approaches that promote co‐design and co‐ownership of the policies.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace97531
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace975312024-05-01T08:19:54Z Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda Yami, M. Asten, Piet J.A. van Hauser, M. Schut, Marc Pali, Pamela N. agricultural policies agricultural development stakeholders Although the political context in Uganda exhibits democratic deficit and patronage, research and development actors have given little attention to the possible negative impact these may have on agricultural policymaking and implementation processes. This article examines the influence of power in perpetuating prevailing narratives around public participation in agricultural policymaking processes. The analysis is based on qualitative data collected between September 2014 and May 2015 using 86 in‐depth interviews, 18 focus group discussions, and recorded observations in stakeholder consultations. Results indicate that while the political setting provides space for uncensored debates, the policymaking process remains under close control of political leaders, technical personnel, and high‐level officers in the government. Policy negotiation remains limited to actors who are knowledgeable about the technical issues and those who have the financial resources and political power to influence decisions, such as international donors. There is limited space for negotiation of competing claims and interests in the processes by public and private actors actively engaged in agricultural development, production, processing, and trade. Thus, efforts to achieve good governance in policy processes fall short due to lack of approaches that promote co‐design and co‐ownership of the policies. 2019-06 2018-09-27T16:33:46Z 2018-09-27T16:33:46Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97531 en Limited Access Wiley Yami, M., van Asten, P., Hauser, M., Schut, M. & Pali, P. (2018). Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda. Rural Sociology, 1-26.
spellingShingle agricultural policies
agricultural development
stakeholders
Yami, M.
Asten, Piet J.A. van
Hauser, M.
Schut, Marc
Pali, Pamela N.
Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda
title Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda
title_full Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda
title_fullStr Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda
title_short Participation without negotiating: influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in Uganda
title_sort participation without negotiating influence of stakeholder power imbalances and engagement models on agricultural policy development in uganda
topic agricultural policies
agricultural development
stakeholders
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/97531
work_keys_str_mv AT yamim participationwithoutnegotiatinginfluenceofstakeholderpowerimbalancesandengagementmodelsonagriculturalpolicydevelopmentinuganda
AT astenpietjavan participationwithoutnegotiatinginfluenceofstakeholderpowerimbalancesandengagementmodelsonagriculturalpolicydevelopmentinuganda
AT hauserm participationwithoutnegotiatinginfluenceofstakeholderpowerimbalancesandengagementmodelsonagriculturalpolicydevelopmentinuganda
AT schutmarc participationwithoutnegotiatinginfluenceofstakeholderpowerimbalancesandengagementmodelsonagriculturalpolicydevelopmentinuganda
AT palipamelan participationwithoutnegotiatinginfluenceofstakeholderpowerimbalancesandengagementmodelsonagriculturalpolicydevelopmentinuganda