Carbon outcomes of major land-cover transitions in SE Asia: great uncertainties and REDD+ policy implications
Policy makers across the tropics propose that carbon finance could provide incentives for forest frontier communities to transition away from swidden agriculture (slash‐and‐burn or shifting cultivation) to other systems that potentially reduce emissions and/or increase carbon sequestration. However,...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95748 |
Ejemplares similares: Carbon outcomes of major land-cover transitions in SE Asia: great uncertainties and REDD+ policy implications
- Zero, one, or in between: Evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy
- Chinese Governance and Transformation Towards Carbon Neutrality
- Swidden, rubber and carbon: can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia?
- Reply to Sloan and Stork: spatially explicit scenario analysis for reconciling agricultural expansion, forest protection, and carbon conservation in Indonesia
- Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia?
- Ensemble yield simulations: crop and climate uncertainties, sensitivity to temperature and genotypic adaptation to climate change