Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?

Deforestation and forest degradation in the Peruvian Amazon represent a major threat to biodiversity-related ecosystem services and the global climate. In 2010, the Peruvian Ministry of Environment launched the National Forest Conservation Program for Climate Change Mitigation, an innovative approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Börner, J., Wunder, Sven, Giudice, R.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95513
_version_ 1855517081739460608
author Börner, J.
Wunder, Sven
Giudice, R.
author_browse Börner, J.
Giudice, R.
Wunder, Sven
author_facet Börner, J.
Wunder, Sven
Giudice, R.
author_sort Börner, J.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Deforestation and forest degradation in the Peruvian Amazon represent a major threat to biodiversity-related ecosystem services and the global climate. In 2010, the Peruvian Ministry of Environment launched the National Forest Conservation Program for Climate Change Mitigation, an innovative approach to maintaining forest cover of over 54 million hectares of land in protected areas and indigenous and peasant communities. A key component is a payments for environmental services scheme encouraging investments in sustainable land and forest uses in community-controlled territories. We conducted an ex-ante assessment of how the program would play out in terms of conservation cost–effectiveness, income effects and distributional (equity) outcomes if payments were up-scaled, as intended, to all native communities in the Peruvian Amazon. Our spatially explicit impact assessment relied on remotely sensed deforestation data and field data-supported estimates of conservation opportunity costs. We found that the spatially heterogeneous distribution of forestland and economic returns to multiple land uses across communities results in important tradeoffs between hypothetical cost–effectiveness, poverty alleviation and equity outcomes. Nevertheless, our scenario analyses suggested that alternative design options for payment schemes could improve both cost–effectiveness and equity outcomes simultaneously.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace95513
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace955132025-06-17T08:23:24Z Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes? Börner, J. Wunder, Sven Giudice, R. deforestation impacts assessment ecosystem services pollution Deforestation and forest degradation in the Peruvian Amazon represent a major threat to biodiversity-related ecosystem services and the global climate. In 2010, the Peruvian Ministry of Environment launched the National Forest Conservation Program for Climate Change Mitigation, an innovative approach to maintaining forest cover of over 54 million hectares of land in protected areas and indigenous and peasant communities. A key component is a payments for environmental services scheme encouraging investments in sustainable land and forest uses in community-controlled territories. We conducted an ex-ante assessment of how the program would play out in terms of conservation cost–effectiveness, income effects and distributional (equity) outcomes if payments were up-scaled, as intended, to all native communities in the Peruvian Amazon. Our spatially explicit impact assessment relied on remotely sensed deforestation data and field data-supported estimates of conservation opportunity costs. We found that the spatially heterogeneous distribution of forestland and economic returns to multiple land uses across communities results in important tradeoffs between hypothetical cost–effectiveness, poverty alleviation and equity outcomes. Nevertheless, our scenario analyses suggested that alternative design options for payment schemes could improve both cost–effectiveness and equity outcomes simultaneously. 2016-12 2018-07-03T11:03:07Z 2018-07-03T11:03:07Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95513 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Börner, J., Wunder, S., Giudice, R.. 2016. Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes? Environmental Conservation, 43 (4) : 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892916000229
spellingShingle deforestation
impacts
assessment
ecosystem services
pollution
Börner, J.
Wunder, Sven
Giudice, R.
Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?
title Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?
title_full Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?
title_fullStr Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?
title_full_unstemmed Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?
title_short Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?
title_sort will up scaled forest conservation incentives in the peruvian amazon produce cost effective and equitable outcomes
topic deforestation
impacts
assessment
ecosystem services
pollution
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95513
work_keys_str_mv AT bornerj willupscaledforestconservationincentivesintheperuvianamazonproducecosteffectiveandequitableoutcomes
AT wundersven willupscaledforestconservationincentivesintheperuvianamazonproducecosteffectiveandequitableoutcomes
AT giudicer willupscaledforestconservationincentivesintheperuvianamazonproducecosteffectiveandequitableoutcomes