The Economic and Legal Sides of Additionality in Payments for Environmental Services
This paper aims to clarify two distinct but complementary questions on economic and legal additionality in the payments for environmental services (PES) debate based on examples from the literature and direct observations made in Madagascar and Mexico. For the economic dimension of additionality, we...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95444 |
Ejemplares similares: The Economic and Legal Sides of Additionality in Payments for Environmental Services
- An Assessment Framework for Benefit Sharing Mechanisms to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation within a Forest Policy Mix
- Design considerations in supporting payments for ecosystem services from community-managed forests in Nepal
- Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications
- Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues
- The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes: A systematic review
- Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation?
