How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+
This paper investigates the adoption of discourses on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) across different national contexts. It draws on institutional theories to develop and test a number of hypotheses on the role of shared beliefs and politico-economic institution...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95336 |
Ejemplares similares: How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+
- Equity and REDD+ in the media: a comparative analysis of policy discourses
- Multistakeholder environmental governance in action: REDD+ discourse coalitions in Tanzania
- Talking the talk of change: REDD+ discourse in the national media
- Policy learning as complex contagion: how social networks shape organizational beliefs in forest-based climate change mitigation
- Information networks and power: confronting the "wicked problem" of REDD+ in Indonesia
- Deadlock or Transformational Change? Exploring Public Discourse on REDD+ across Seven Countries