Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires

Across leading environmental challenges—fire management, climate change, deforestation – there is growing awareness of the need to better account for diverse stakeholder perceptions across complex, multi-level governance arrangements. Perceptions often condition behavior, compliance and engagement i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carmenta, R., Zabala, A., Daeli, W., Phelps, J.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95169
_version_ 1855516428216565760
author Carmenta, R.
Zabala, A.
Daeli, W.
Phelps, J.
author_browse Carmenta, R.
Daeli, W.
Phelps, J.
Zabala, A.
author_facet Carmenta, R.
Zabala, A.
Daeli, W.
Phelps, J.
author_sort Carmenta, R.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Across leading environmental challenges—fire management, climate change, deforestation – there is growing awareness of the need to better account for diverse stakeholder perceptions across complex, multi-level governance arrangements. Perceptions often condition behavior, compliance and engagement in ways that impact environmental outcomes. We illustrate the importance of, and approaches to, examining perceptions across scales of governance (e.g. international, national, local) and sectors (e.g. civil society, government, corporate) through the example of Indonesian peatland fires. Peatlands are crucial global carbon stocks threatened by land use change and fire and subject to a range of policy interventions that affect many different stakeholder groups. Peatland drainage and conversion to plantation agriculture has been associated with severe, uncontrolled peat fires that present significant climate, public health and economic risks. Peatland fire management has become a domestic and international priority, spurring intensely contentious debates, policies and legal proceedings. Previous fire management interventions (FMI) are numerous yet have suffered widespread implementation failures. Against this backdrop, our manuscript provides a thematically and methodologically novel analysis of how diverse stakeholders, from local farmers to international policy makers, perceive peatland fires in terms of, i) how they prioritize the associated benefits and burdens, and ii) the perceived effectiveness of FMI. We adopt an innovative application of Q method to provide needed insights that serve to quantify the areas of contention and consensus that exist among the stakeholders and their multi-dimensional perspectives. We show that many of the contemporary FMI were perceived as among the most effective interventions overall, but were also the most controversial between groups. Clear consensus areas were related to the shared concerns for the local health impacts and the potential of government support for fire-free alternatives as a solution pathway. Improved understanding of stakeholder perceptions has potential to: give voice to marginalized communities; enable transparent mediation of diverse priorities; inform public education campaigns, and shape future policy and governance arrangements.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace95169
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace951692025-09-25T13:01:37Z Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires Carmenta, R. Zabala, A. Daeli, W. Phelps, J. fires fire management peatlands governance deforestation conservation ecology Across leading environmental challenges—fire management, climate change, deforestation – there is growing awareness of the need to better account for diverse stakeholder perceptions across complex, multi-level governance arrangements. Perceptions often condition behavior, compliance and engagement in ways that impact environmental outcomes. We illustrate the importance of, and approaches to, examining perceptions across scales of governance (e.g. international, national, local) and sectors (e.g. civil society, government, corporate) through the example of Indonesian peatland fires. Peatlands are crucial global carbon stocks threatened by land use change and fire and subject to a range of policy interventions that affect many different stakeholder groups. Peatland drainage and conversion to plantation agriculture has been associated with severe, uncontrolled peat fires that present significant climate, public health and economic risks. Peatland fire management has become a domestic and international priority, spurring intensely contentious debates, policies and legal proceedings. Previous fire management interventions (FMI) are numerous yet have suffered widespread implementation failures. Against this backdrop, our manuscript provides a thematically and methodologically novel analysis of how diverse stakeholders, from local farmers to international policy makers, perceive peatland fires in terms of, i) how they prioritize the associated benefits and burdens, and ii) the perceived effectiveness of FMI. We adopt an innovative application of Q method to provide needed insights that serve to quantify the areas of contention and consensus that exist among the stakeholders and their multi-dimensional perspectives. We show that many of the contemporary FMI were perceived as among the most effective interventions overall, but were also the most controversial between groups. Clear consensus areas were related to the shared concerns for the local health impacts and the potential of government support for fire-free alternatives as a solution pathway. Improved understanding of stakeholder perceptions has potential to: give voice to marginalized communities; enable transparent mediation of diverse priorities; inform public education campaigns, and shape future policy and governance arrangements. 2017-09 2018-07-03T11:02:31Z 2018-07-03T11:02:31Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95169 en Open Access Elsevier Carmenta, R., Zabala, A., Daeli, W., Phelps, J.. 2017. Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires Global Environmental Change, 46 : 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.001
spellingShingle fires
fire management
peatlands
governance
deforestation
conservation
ecology
Carmenta, R.
Zabala, A.
Daeli, W.
Phelps, J.
Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
title Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
title_full Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
title_fullStr Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
title_short Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
title_sort perceptions across scales of governance and the indonesian peatland fires
topic fires
fire management
peatlands
governance
deforestation
conservation
ecology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95169
work_keys_str_mv AT carmentar perceptionsacrossscalesofgovernanceandtheindonesianpeatlandfires
AT zabalaa perceptionsacrossscalesofgovernanceandtheindonesianpeatlandfires
AT daeliw perceptionsacrossscalesofgovernanceandtheindonesianpeatlandfires
AT phelpsj perceptionsacrossscalesofgovernanceandtheindonesianpeatlandfires