Improving credibility and transparency of conservation impact evaluations through the partial identification approach
The fundamental challenge of evaluating the impact of conservation interventions is that researchers must estimate the difference between the outcome after an intervention occurred and what the outcome would have been without it (counterfactual). Because the counterfactual is unobservable, researche...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/94036 |
Ejemplares similares: Improving credibility and transparency of conservation impact evaluations through the partial identification approach
- Is Inflation targeting credible in Asia? A panel GARCH approach
- Designing incentive agreements for conservation: an innovative approach
- Simulating oil palm expansion requires credible approaches that address real issues
- Identification of hazards and risk assessment for a 40kVA diesel powered lighting set.
- Generating credible weather data for future climates
- Natural resource management: credible knowledge needed