Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Participation of local communities in the Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of forest changes has been promoted as a strategy that lowers the cost of MRV and increases their engagement with REDD+. This systematic review of literature assessed the claims of participatory MRV (PMRV) in ach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthorne, S.D., Boissiere, M., Felker, M.E., Atmadja, S.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/93970
_version_ 1855528114667388928
author Hawthorne, S.D.
Boissiere, M.
Felker, M.E.
Atmadja, S.
author_browse Atmadja, S.
Boissiere, M.
Felker, M.E.
Hawthorne, S.D.
author_facet Hawthorne, S.D.
Boissiere, M.
Felker, M.E.
Atmadja, S.
author_sort Hawthorne, S.D.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Participation of local communities in the Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of forest changes has been promoted as a strategy that lowers the cost of MRV and increases their engagement with REDD+. This systematic review of literature assessed the claims of participatory MRV (PMRV) in achieving REDD+ outcomes. We identified 29 PMRV publications that consisted of 20 peer-reviewed and 9 non peer-reviewed publications, with 14 publications being empirically based studies. The evidence supporting PMRV claims was categorized into empirical finding, citation or assumption. Our analysis of the empirical studies showed that PMRV projects were conducted in 17 countries in three tropical continents and across various forest and land tenure types. Most of these projects tested the feasibility of participatory measurement or monitoring, which limited the participation of local communities to data gathering. PMRV claims of providing accurate local biomass measurements and lowering MRV cost were well-supported with empirical evidence. Claims that PMRV supports REDD+ social outcomes that affect local communities directly, such as increased environmental awareness and equity in benefit sharing, were supported with less empirical evidence than REDD+ technical outcomes. This may be due to the difficulties in measuring social outcomes and the slow progress in the development and implementation of REDD+ components outside of experimental research contexts. Although lessons from other monitoring contexts have been used to support PMRV claims, they are only applicable when the enabling conditions can be replicated in REDD+ contexts. There is a need for more empirical evidence to support PMRV claims on achieving REDD+ social outcomes, which may be addressed with more opportunities and rigorous methods for assessing REDD+ social outcomes. Integrating future PMRV studies into local REDD+ implementations may help create those opportunities, while increasing the participation of local communities as local REDD+ stakeholders. Further development and testing of participatory reporting framework are required to integrate PMRV data with the national database. Publication of empirical PMRV studies is encouraged to guide when, where and how PMRV should be implemented.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace93970
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
publisherStr Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace939702025-06-17T08:23:47Z Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review Hawthorne, S.D. Boissiere, M. Felker, M.E. Atmadja, S. forests biodiversity forest ecology land use remote sensing systematic review Participation of local communities in the Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of forest changes has been promoted as a strategy that lowers the cost of MRV and increases their engagement with REDD+. This systematic review of literature assessed the claims of participatory MRV (PMRV) in achieving REDD+ outcomes. We identified 29 PMRV publications that consisted of 20 peer-reviewed and 9 non peer-reviewed publications, with 14 publications being empirically based studies. The evidence supporting PMRV claims was categorized into empirical finding, citation or assumption. Our analysis of the empirical studies showed that PMRV projects were conducted in 17 countries in three tropical continents and across various forest and land tenure types. Most of these projects tested the feasibility of participatory measurement or monitoring, which limited the participation of local communities to data gathering. PMRV claims of providing accurate local biomass measurements and lowering MRV cost were well-supported with empirical evidence. Claims that PMRV supports REDD+ social outcomes that affect local communities directly, such as increased environmental awareness and equity in benefit sharing, were supported with less empirical evidence than REDD+ technical outcomes. This may be due to the difficulties in measuring social outcomes and the slow progress in the development and implementation of REDD+ components outside of experimental research contexts. Although lessons from other monitoring contexts have been used to support PMRV claims, they are only applicable when the enabling conditions can be replicated in REDD+ contexts. There is a need for more empirical evidence to support PMRV claims on achieving REDD+ social outcomes, which may be addressed with more opportunities and rigorous methods for assessing REDD+ social outcomes. Integrating future PMRV studies into local REDD+ implementations may help create those opportunities, while increasing the participation of local communities as local REDD+ stakeholders. Further development and testing of participatory reporting framework are required to integrate PMRV data with the national database. Publication of empirical PMRV studies is encouraged to guide when, where and how PMRV should be implemented. 2016 2018-07-03T10:56:43Z 2018-07-03T10:56:43Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/93970 en Open Access Public Library of Science Hawthorne, S.D., Boissiere, M., Felker, M.E., Atmadja, S.. 2016. Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes : A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 11 (11) : e0157826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157826
spellingShingle forests
biodiversity
forest ecology
land use
remote sensing
systematic review
Hawthorne, S.D.
Boissiere, M.
Felker, M.E.
Atmadja, S.
Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessing the Claims of Participatory Measurement, Reporting and Verification (PMRV) in Achieving REDD+ Outcomes: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessing the claims of participatory measurement reporting and verification pmrv in achieving redd outcomes a systematic review
topic forests
biodiversity
forest ecology
land use
remote sensing
systematic review
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/93970
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthornesd assessingtheclaimsofparticipatorymeasurementreportingandverificationpmrvinachievingreddoutcomesasystematicreview
AT boissierem assessingtheclaimsofparticipatorymeasurementreportingandverificationpmrvinachievingreddoutcomesasystematicreview
AT felkerme assessingtheclaimsofparticipatorymeasurementreportingandverificationpmrvinachievingreddoutcomesasystematicreview
AT atmadjas assessingtheclaimsofparticipatorymeasurementreportingandverificationpmrvinachievingreddoutcomesasystematicreview