Risks to REDD+: potential pitfalls for policy design and implementation
International negotiations for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+) under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) were finally concluded in 2015. However, due to the complex design and implementation processes...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/93933 |
Ejemplares similares: Risks to REDD+: potential pitfalls for policy design and implementation
- Being equitable is not always fair: An assessment of PFES implementation in Dien Bien, Vietnam
- Lessons from the perceptions of equity and risks in payments for forest environmental services (PFES) fund distribution: A case study of Dien Bien and Son La provinces in Vietnam
- Approaches to benefit sharing: A preliminary comparative analysis of 13 REDD+ countries
- Các phuong án tiep can chia se loi ích: Ket qua so sánh so bo tai 13 nuoc dang thuc hien REDD+
- Whose Equity Matters?: National to Local Equity Perceptions in Vietnam's Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services Scheme
- Lessons from Payments for Ecosystem Services for REDD+ Benefit-Sharing Mechanisms