Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global-comparative perspective
In the forest–livelihoods literature, forests are widely perceived to provide both common safety nets to shocks and resources for seasonal gap-filling. We use a large global-comparative dataset to test these responses. We find households rank forest-extraction responses to shocks lower than most com...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/93736 |
Similar Items: Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global-comparative perspective
- Rural income diversification in Ethiopia: Patterns, trends, and welfare impacts
- Rural income and forest reliance in Highland Guatemala
- Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: a global comparative study
- Circular migration, small-scale logging, and household livelihoods in Uganda
- Does Income Inequality Influence Subjective Wellbeing? Evidence from 21 Developing Countries
- Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis