The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review
Through a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, this paper analyzes evidence of the livelihood impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). Forty-six studies assessed PES livelihood impacts. The assessments presented more positive livelihood impacts than negative ones, foc...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/91940 |
Ejemplares similares: The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review
- To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa, Asia, and Latin America?
- Hunters and hunting across indigenous and colonist communities at the forestagriculture interface: an ethnozoological study from the Peruvian Amazon
- Adding the temporal dimension to spatial patterns of payment for ecosystem services enrollment
- Context Matters: Exploring the Cost-effectiveness of Fixed Payments and Procurement Auctions for PES
- From theory to practice: what should we have in mind when building an effective and sustainable Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) scheme for silvopastoral systems? Evidence from Colombia
- The prospects for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Vietnam: a look at three payment schemes
