Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia

A monitoring study was carried out in Gumara watershed, upper Blue Nile basin, with the objective of evaluating livestock water productivity (LWP) using a life cycle assessment method. Sixty two smallholder farmers were selected for the study implemented between November 2006 and February 2008. Data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alemayehu, M., Amede, Tilahun, Peden, Donald G., Kumsa, T., Böhme, M.H., Peters, Kurt J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/90510
_version_ 1855521918747148288
author Alemayehu, M.
Amede, Tilahun
Peden, Donald G.
Kumsa, T.
Böhme, M.H.
Peters, Kurt J.
author_browse Alemayehu, M.
Amede, Tilahun
Böhme, M.H.
Kumsa, T.
Peden, Donald G.
Peters, Kurt J.
author_facet Alemayehu, M.
Amede, Tilahun
Peden, Donald G.
Kumsa, T.
Böhme, M.H.
Peters, Kurt J.
author_sort Alemayehu, M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description A monitoring study was carried out in Gumara watershed, upper Blue Nile basin, with the objective of evaluating livestock water productivity (LWP) using a life cycle assessment method. Sixty two smallholder farmers were selected for the study implemented between November 2006 and February 2008. Data on crop and livestock production were collected to allow assessment of livestock water productivity. Study sites were situated in three different rainfed mixed crop/livestock farming systems; barley/potato based system (BPS), tef/finger-millet based system (TMS), and rice/noug based system (RNS). LWP was found to be significantly lower (p < 0.01) in RNS (0.057 USD m−3 water) than in TMS (0.066 USD m−3 water) or in BPS (0.066 USD m−3 water). Notably, water requirement per kg live weight of cattle increased towards the lower altitude area (in RNS) mainly because of increased evapo-transpiration. As a result, 20% more water was required per kg live weight of cattle in the low ground RNS compared to BPS situated in the upstream parts of the study area. Cattle herd management that involved early offtake increased LWP by 28% over the practice of late offtake. Crop water productivity expressed in monetary units (0.39 USD m−3 water) was higher than LWP (0.063 USD m−3 water) across the mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed. Strategies for improving LWP, from its present low level, could include keeping only the more productive animals, increasing pasture productivity and linking production to marketing. These strategies would also ease the imbalance between the existing high livestock population and the declining carrying capacity of natural pasture.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace90510
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace905102025-12-08T09:54:28Z Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia Alemayehu, M. Amede, Tilahun Peden, Donald G. Kumsa, T. Böhme, M.H. Peters, Kurt J. livestock water farming systems A monitoring study was carried out in Gumara watershed, upper Blue Nile basin, with the objective of evaluating livestock water productivity (LWP) using a life cycle assessment method. Sixty two smallholder farmers were selected for the study implemented between November 2006 and February 2008. Data on crop and livestock production were collected to allow assessment of livestock water productivity. Study sites were situated in three different rainfed mixed crop/livestock farming systems; barley/potato based system (BPS), tef/finger-millet based system (TMS), and rice/noug based system (RNS). LWP was found to be significantly lower (p < 0.01) in RNS (0.057 USD m−3 water) than in TMS (0.066 USD m−3 water) or in BPS (0.066 USD m−3 water). Notably, water requirement per kg live weight of cattle increased towards the lower altitude area (in RNS) mainly because of increased evapo-transpiration. As a result, 20% more water was required per kg live weight of cattle in the low ground RNS compared to BPS situated in the upstream parts of the study area. Cattle herd management that involved early offtake increased LWP by 28% over the practice of late offtake. Crop water productivity expressed in monetary units (0.39 USD m−3 water) was higher than LWP (0.063 USD m−3 water) across the mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed. Strategies for improving LWP, from its present low level, could include keeping only the more productive animals, increasing pasture productivity and linking production to marketing. These strategies would also ease the imbalance between the existing high livestock population and the declining carrying capacity of natural pasture. 2018-10 2018-01-17T15:17:24Z 2018-01-17T15:17:24Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/90510 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Alemayehu, M., Amede, T., Peden, D., Kumsa, T., Böhme, M.H. and Peters, K.J. 2018. Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia. Experimental Agriculture 54(5): 684-698.
spellingShingle livestock
water
farming systems
Alemayehu, M.
Amede, Tilahun
Peden, Donald G.
Kumsa, T.
Böhme, M.H.
Peters, Kurt J.
Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia
title Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia
title_full Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia
title_fullStr Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia
title_short Assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of Gumara watershed, Ethiopia
title_sort assessing livestock water productivity in mixed farming systems of gumara watershed ethiopia
topic livestock
water
farming systems
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/90510
work_keys_str_mv AT alemayehum assessinglivestockwaterproductivityinmixedfarmingsystemsofgumarawatershedethiopia
AT amedetilahun assessinglivestockwaterproductivityinmixedfarmingsystemsofgumarawatershedethiopia
AT pedendonaldg assessinglivestockwaterproductivityinmixedfarmingsystemsofgumarawatershedethiopia
AT kumsat assessinglivestockwaterproductivityinmixedfarmingsystemsofgumarawatershedethiopia
AT bohmemh assessinglivestockwaterproductivityinmixedfarmingsystemsofgumarawatershedethiopia
AT peterskurtj assessinglivestockwaterproductivityinmixedfarmingsystemsofgumarawatershedethiopia