Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research
There is increasing interest in using systematic review to synthesize evidence on the social and environmental effects of and adaptations to climate change. Use of systematic review for evidence in this field is complicated by the heterogeneity of methods used and by uneven reporting. In order to fa...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89874 |
Similar Items: Systematic Review of Methods in Low-Consensus Fields: Supporting Commensuration through `Construct-Centered Methods Aggregation’ in the Case of Climate Change Vulnerability Research
- Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change in developing country agriculture
- Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
- Strengthening the food systems governance evidence base: Supporting commensurability of research through a systematic review of methods
- A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: in search of transparency, coherence and comparability
- Methods of consensus building for community based fisheries management in Bangladesh and the Mekong Delta