Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)

This study was conducted with the objective of predicting and comparing expected gains for two selection indices and to aid identification of a better index to improve maize populations for a target environment, in thiscase, small-farm conditions. Data from S2 lines from each of three populations ev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ajala, S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89384
_version_ 1855513361295343616
author Ajala, S.
author_browse Ajala, S.
author_facet Ajala, S.
author_sort Ajala, S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This study was conducted with the objective of predicting and comparing expected gains for two selection indices and to aid identification of a better index to improve maize populations for a target environment, in thiscase, small-farm conditions. Data from S2 lines from each of three populations evaluated at three locations in 1988 were subjected to (a) an index that uses economic weights and (b) rank summation index (RSI) that is both weight and parameter free. Responses to single trait selections were much higher than using an index. RSI was considered a better index because it was operationally more efficient and simpler. Selection through RSI will in addition to improving the aggregate trait in the desired direction, improve grain yield and will not increase height much.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace89384
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2010
publishDateRange 2010
publishDateSort 2010
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace893842023-06-12T08:17:34Z Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.) Ajala, S. zea mays maize aggregate data This study was conducted with the objective of predicting and comparing expected gains for two selection indices and to aid identification of a better index to improve maize populations for a target environment, in thiscase, small-farm conditions. Data from S2 lines from each of three populations evaluated at three locations in 1988 were subjected to (a) an index that uses economic weights and (b) rank summation index (RSI) that is both weight and parameter free. Responses to single trait selections were much higher than using an index. RSI was considered a better index because it was operationally more efficient and simpler. Selection through RSI will in addition to improving the aggregate trait in the desired direction, improve grain yield and will not increase height much. 2010 2017-11-14T08:07:52Z 2017-11-14T08:07:52Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89384 en Limited Access Ajala, S.O. (2010). Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 185-189.
spellingShingle zea mays
maize
aggregate data
Ajala, S.
Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)
title Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)
title_full Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)
title_fullStr Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)
title_full_unstemmed Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)
title_short Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)
title_sort expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize zea mays l
topic zea mays
maize
aggregate data
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89384
work_keys_str_mv AT ajalas expectedresponsestoaggregatetraitselectioninmaizezeamaysl