Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states

This brief focuses on gender equity and social inclusion in India’s Joint Forest Management (JFM) programme; one of the first and largest initiatives for collaborative forest governance worldwide. In JFM, the state, represented by the Forest Department (FD), and the village community share responsib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elias, Marlène
Formato: Brief
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Bioversity International 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89106
_version_ 1855534863382216704
author Elias, Marlène
author_browse Elias, Marlène
author_facet Elias, Marlène
author_sort Elias, Marlène
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This brief focuses on gender equity and social inclusion in India’s Joint Forest Management (JFM) programme; one of the first and largest initiatives for collaborative forest governance worldwide. In JFM, the state, represented by the Forest Department (FD), and the village community share responsibilities and benefits of jointly protecting and managing forests adjoining villages. The agreement is operationalized through JFM Committees (JFMCs) – referred to as Village Forest Committees (VFCs) in some states – where elected community representatives and a FD official make forest-related decisions in a supposedly collaborative manner. In an effort to promote gender equity and social inclusion, seats are reserved on these committees for women and marginalized groups, such as Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Schedule Tribes (STs). Yet, despite reservations, the ability of these groups to actively engage in JFM processes remains limited. The brief addresses two primary questions: 1) Do local people perceive JFM, as implemented in two Indian landscapes, as equitable and inclusive?; 2) How can gender equity and social inclusion be improved in India’s JFM Program? The research shows continued social exclusions from JFM processes on the basis of gender and ethnicity. Gender and ethnicity do not operate independently of each other to influence active participation in JFM. Participation is shaped at the intersection of gender and ethnicity, such that women and men from different ethnic groups have distinct experiences with JFM. These findings underscore the need to reframe the issue of ‘women’s participation’ to capture inequalities among women from different ethnic groups. Recommendations for enhancing gender equality and social inclusion in JFM are provided.
format Brief
id CGSpace89106
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Bioversity International
publisherStr Bioversity International
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace891062025-11-05T07:32:35Z Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states Elias, Marlène gender forests social participation This brief focuses on gender equity and social inclusion in India’s Joint Forest Management (JFM) programme; one of the first and largest initiatives for collaborative forest governance worldwide. In JFM, the state, represented by the Forest Department (FD), and the village community share responsibilities and benefits of jointly protecting and managing forests adjoining villages. The agreement is operationalized through JFM Committees (JFMCs) – referred to as Village Forest Committees (VFCs) in some states – where elected community representatives and a FD official make forest-related decisions in a supposedly collaborative manner. In an effort to promote gender equity and social inclusion, seats are reserved on these committees for women and marginalized groups, such as Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Schedule Tribes (STs). Yet, despite reservations, the ability of these groups to actively engage in JFM processes remains limited. The brief addresses two primary questions: 1) Do local people perceive JFM, as implemented in two Indian landscapes, as equitable and inclusive?; 2) How can gender equity and social inclusion be improved in India’s JFM Program? The research shows continued social exclusions from JFM processes on the basis of gender and ethnicity. Gender and ethnicity do not operate independently of each other to influence active participation in JFM. Participation is shaped at the intersection of gender and ethnicity, such that women and men from different ethnic groups have distinct experiences with JFM. These findings underscore the need to reframe the issue of ‘women’s participation’ to capture inequalities among women from different ethnic groups. Recommendations for enhancing gender equality and social inclusion in JFM are provided. 2017 2017-10-27T12:53:42Z 2017-10-27T12:53:42Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89106 en Open Access application/pdf Bioversity International Elias, M. (2017) Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states. Rome (Italy): Bioversity International, 6 p. ISBN: 978-92-9255-076-9
spellingShingle gender
forests
social participation
Elias, Marlène
Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states
title Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states
title_full Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states
title_fullStr Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states
title_full_unstemmed Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states
title_short Gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management: Lessons from two Indian states
title_sort gender equity and social inclusion in joint forest management lessons from two indian states
topic gender
forests
social participation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89106
work_keys_str_mv AT eliasmarlene genderequityandsocialinclusioninjointforestmanagementlessonsfromtwoindianstates