Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop

Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) has been a problem in the East African coastal cassava growing areas for more than 70 years. The disease is caused by successful infection with Cassava Brown Streak Virus (CBSV) (Family, Potyviridae: Genus, Ipomovirus). Diagnosis of CBSD has for long been primaril...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rwegasira, G.M., Rey, M.E.C., Nawabu, H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88146
_version_ 1855531475135365120
author Rwegasira, G.M.
Rey, M.E.C.
Nawabu, H.
author_browse Nawabu, H.
Rey, M.E.C.
Rwegasira, G.M.
author_facet Rwegasira, G.M.
Rey, M.E.C.
Nawabu, H.
author_sort Rwegasira, G.M.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) has been a problem in the East African coastal cassava growing areas for more than 70 years. The disease is caused by successful infection with Cassava Brown Streak Virus (CBSV) (Family, Potyviridae: Genus, Ipomovirus). Diagnosis of CBSD has for long been primarily leaf symptoms-based. This is unreliable due to the irregular pattern and variability of the disease phenotype in roots and leaves. The suitable method to undertake reliable field diagnostic survey and derive acceptable analysis of the disease situation has never been standardized. Zigzag and diagonal approaches for disease assessment have been used successfully on other diseases infecting cassava such as Cassava mosaic disease but neither of them has ever been tested and proven suitable for CBSD assessment. In addition, the suitable sample for successful molecular detection of the causal virus has never been optimised. The number of samples to be collected from large plant stands which would be a true representation of the population has never been determined. The effect of sample bulking on possible detection or non detection of infection particularly when un-infected samples are combined with infected ones is not known. In this study, the comparative efficiencies of diagonal and zigzag approaches to CBSD field diagnosis were tested through surveys conducted in 20 randomly selected farmers’ fields in major cassava growing areas of the Coastal and Lake Zones in Tanzania. Using molecular diagnostic techniques, the plant parts which are suitable for Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) detection were determined. Sample bulking was tested for rationalized laboratory detection of CBSV over large cassava stands. The study revealed that CBSD incidences and severities obtained using either diagonal or zigzag approach did not differ significantly. Suitable parts for CBSV detection were identified to be flowers, fruits, apical buds, young tender leaves, newly-opened leaves, youngest symptomatic leaves, the tender top-green portion of the stem and non-necrotic storage root tissues. CBSV was not detected in seeds. In bulked leaf samples, CBSV was detected from ratios of 1:1 up to 1:19 of CBSVinfected to CBSV-free tissues in cultivar Albert. It was concluded that either zigzag or diagonal can be used for CBSD field diagnosis. A choice of the suitable sample is of absolute necessity, and bulking of many samples for collective CBSV detection over a large crop stand is effective.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace88146
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace881462025-11-11T10:36:34Z Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop Rwegasira, G.M. Rey, M.E.C. Nawabu, H. cassava diseases diagnosis sampling Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) has been a problem in the East African coastal cassava growing areas for more than 70 years. The disease is caused by successful infection with Cassava Brown Streak Virus (CBSV) (Family, Potyviridae: Genus, Ipomovirus). Diagnosis of CBSD has for long been primarily leaf symptoms-based. This is unreliable due to the irregular pattern and variability of the disease phenotype in roots and leaves. The suitable method to undertake reliable field diagnostic survey and derive acceptable analysis of the disease situation has never been standardized. Zigzag and diagonal approaches for disease assessment have been used successfully on other diseases infecting cassava such as Cassava mosaic disease but neither of them has ever been tested and proven suitable for CBSD assessment. In addition, the suitable sample for successful molecular detection of the causal virus has never been optimised. The number of samples to be collected from large plant stands which would be a true representation of the population has never been determined. The effect of sample bulking on possible detection or non detection of infection particularly when un-infected samples are combined with infected ones is not known. In this study, the comparative efficiencies of diagonal and zigzag approaches to CBSD field diagnosis were tested through surveys conducted in 20 randomly selected farmers’ fields in major cassava growing areas of the Coastal and Lake Zones in Tanzania. Using molecular diagnostic techniques, the plant parts which are suitable for Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) detection were determined. Sample bulking was tested for rationalized laboratory detection of CBSV over large cassava stands. The study revealed that CBSD incidences and severities obtained using either diagonal or zigzag approach did not differ significantly. Suitable parts for CBSV detection were identified to be flowers, fruits, apical buds, young tender leaves, newly-opened leaves, youngest symptomatic leaves, the tender top-green portion of the stem and non-necrotic storage root tissues. CBSV was not detected in seeds. In bulked leaf samples, CBSV was detected from ratios of 1:1 up to 1:19 of CBSVinfected to CBSV-free tissues in cultivar Albert. It was concluded that either zigzag or diagonal can be used for CBSD field diagnosis. A choice of the suitable sample is of absolute necessity, and bulking of many samples for collective CBSV detection over a large crop stand is effective. 2011 2017-10-05T07:42:39Z 2017-10-05T07:42:39Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88146 en Open Access application/pdf Rwegasira, G.M., Rey, M.E.C. & Nawabu, H. (2011). Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (potiviridae: ipomovirus) in field-grown cassava crop. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 11(3), 4739-4756.
spellingShingle cassava
diseases
diagnosis
sampling
Rwegasira, G.M.
Rey, M.E.C.
Nawabu, H.
Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop
title Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop
title_full Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop
title_fullStr Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop
title_short Approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus (Potiviridae: Ipomovirus) in fieldgrown cassava crop
title_sort approaches to diagnosis and detection of cassava brown streak virus potiviridae ipomovirus in fieldgrown cassava crop
topic cassava
diseases
diagnosis
sampling
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88146
work_keys_str_mv AT rwegasiragm approachestodiagnosisanddetectionofcassavabrownstreakviruspotiviridaeipomovirusinfieldgrowncassavacrop
AT reymec approachestodiagnosisanddetectionofcassavabrownstreakviruspotiviridaeipomovirusinfieldgrowncassavacrop
AT nawabuh approachestodiagnosisanddetectionofcassavabrownstreakviruspotiviridaeipomovirusinfieldgrowncassavacrop